silhouettes of two men standing and watching sunset

Dispute Resolution

France

Our Dispute Resolution team has three partners, Jean-Fabrice Brun, Olivier Kuhn and Francois-Xavier Mattéoli, and a team of seven employees dedicated entirely to the work.
With extensive experience in civil and criminal proceedings, we work in all types of civil, commercial, financial and criminal litigation. We also work in domestic and international arbitration.
We support our clients in complex and strategic cases at every stage of litigation: from the pre-litigation phase to enforcement measures to representing their interests at first instance and on appeal.

We can assist you in all types of litigation, including contract law, commercial law, corporate law, litigation concerning any form of liability, financial law, construction law, healthcare law, environmental law, insurance law, civil enforcement procedures, criminal business law, criminal tax law, media law and family law.
With extensive experience in dispute resolution, we can support you at every stage of litigation:

  • risk analysis;
  • pre-litigation process;
  • defining a legal strategy;
  • emergency or preventive procedures;
  • representation before national courts and arbitral tribunals;
  • amicable settlement;
  • enforcement of court decisions and arbitral awards.

Working closely with all the firm's teams and all our international partners, we can provide you with optimum technical expertise in all areas of domestic law and foreign law.
Available at any time, we can be mobilised in an emergency, for example to assist you in criminal or tax searches.

Read more Read less

A team ranked by the magazine Option Droit et Affaires 2018 in the following categories: International Arbitration, Disputes relating to finance, the stock market and AMF regulations, Acquisition disputes, Disputes relating to defective products and damages, Business criminal law, International Arbitration

Option Droit et affaires 2018
Our Tax Team
Our Em­ploy­ment & Pen­sions Team
Our Cor­por­ate/M&A Team

Feed

Show only
13/12/2018
The Ger­man Fed­er­al Court of Justice rules in Achmea – entry in­to the...
In its re­cent de­cision (I ZB 2/15), the Ger­man Fed­er­al Court of Justice (BGH) set aside the award ob­tained by the Dutch in­vestor Achmea against the Slov­aki­an Re­pub­lic. The BGH's de­cision came down on 31 Oc­to­ber 2018 and was not un­ex­pec­ted giv­en that the Ger­man.
16/11/2018
Third-Party Fund­ing in in­ter­na­tion­al in­vest­ment ar­bit­ra­tion – en route...
Over the last couple of years, Third-Party Fund­ing (TPF) has be­come more and more com­mon with­in in­ter­na­tion­al in­vest­ment ar­bit­ra­tion. Ac­cord­ing to a re­port pub­lished by the In­ter­na­tion­al Coun­cil for Com­mer­cial Ar­bit­ra­tion (ICCA) in 2015, 60 % or more of all.
06/11/2018
Ger­many in­tro­duces a con­sumer mass ac­tion: The Mod­el De­clar­at­ory Ac­tion...
In the wake of the in­tro­duc­tion of mod­el de­clar­at­ory ac­tion in Ger­many, both busi­ness people and con­sumers are strug­gling with its mean­ing. Mass claim, col­lect­ive claim, and class ac­tion are of­ten as­so­ci­ated with and men­tioned in the same breath as class ac­tion.
25/09/2018
In the Af­ter­math of Achmea – Does Vat­ten­fall En­sure the Fu­ture for...
On 6 March 2018, the EU Court of Justice (CJEU) held in its Achmea rul­ing that dis­pute set­tle­ment pro­vi­sions provid­ing for ar­bit­ra­tion in in­tra-EU bi­lat­er­al in­vest­ment treat­ies (BITs) are in­com­pat­ible with EU law.
07/08/2018
The Singa­pore Me­di­ation Con­ven­tion: Plug­ging the gap in cross-bor­der...
This art­icle is pro­duced by CMS Hol­born Asia, a Form­al Law Al­li­ance between CMS Singa­pore and Hol­born Law LLC. On 26 June 2018, the fi­nal drafts for a con­ven­tion on the en­force­ment of in­ter­na­tion­al set­tle­ment agree­ments res­ult­ing from me­di­ation and the cor­res­pond­ing.
13/07/2018
New EU pro­pos­al for rep­res­ent­at­ive ac­tions: "One for all – and all...
Class ac­tions, col­lect­ive ac­tions, mod­el de­clar­at­ory ac­tions. Rep­res­ent­at­ive types of leg­al ac­tions have been on every­one's lips and dis­cussed on the na­tion­al and EU level since the 2017 dies­el emis­sions case.
14/06/2018
In­ter­na­tion­al PPAs: High Court pro­tects ar­bit­ra­tion pro­cess
In At­las Power Ltd v Na­tion­al Trans­mis­sion and Des­patch Com­pany Lim­ited [2018] EWHC 1052, the Eng­lish High Court gran­ted an anti-suit in­jec­tion to a group of in­de­pend­ent power pur­chasers in Pakistan (“IPPs”) to pre­vent a col­lat­er­al at­tack against an ar­bit­ral.
04/07/2017
The New Fla­menco – Su­preme Court al­lows own­ers’ ap­peal
The Su­preme Court, on 28 June 2017, found in fa­vour of the own­ers in the long-awaited “New Fla­menco” judg­ment - Glob­alia Busi­ness Travel S. A. U. (formerly Travel­Plan S. A. U. ) of Spain v Fulton Ship­ping Inc of Panama.
21/06/2017
The Ver­dict - Round-up of cor­por­ate crime de­vel­op­ments across CMS
We are pleased to send our new is­sue of The Ver­dict, an at-a-glance round-up of re­cent leg­al de­vel­op­ments in re­la­tion to cor­por­ate crime. In this is­sue, the spot­light is on some sig­ni­fic­ant changes to anti-cor­rup­tion laws in the Czech Re­pub­lic, in­clud­ing.
17/05/2017
Drastic changes in re­new­able en­ergy laws trig­ger dam­ages award
In an award dated 4 May 2017 (pub­licly avail­able in Span­ish only) is­sued in Eiser In­fra­struc­ture Lim­ited and En­er­gia Sol­ar Lux­em­bourg S. à. r. l v The King­dom of Spain (IC­SID Case No. ARB/13/36), an ar­bit­ral tribunal found that Spain’s le­gis­lat­ive changes in the.
20/03/2017
Due di­li­gence and pro­por­tion­al­ity un­der scru­tiny in latest IC­SID li­ab­il­ity...
Sum­mary In a de­cision dated 21 Feb­ru­ary 2017, a tribunal act­ing un­der the aus­pices of the In­ter­na­tion­al Centre for Set­tle­ment of In­vest­ment Dis­putes (“IC­SID”), the World Bank’s ar­bit­ra­tion in­sti­tu­tion, in Am­pal-Amer­ic­an Is­rael Corp.
15/03/2017
Newly amended ICC Ar­bit­ra­tion Rules provide for ex­ped­ited pro­ced­ures
On 1 March 2017, the latest amend­ment to the ICC Ar­bit­ra­tion Rules (the “ICC Rules”) came in­to force, in­tro­du­cing a num­ber of changes aimed at in­creas­ing trans­par­ency and ef­fi­ciency in ICC ar­bit­ra­tion pro­ceed­ings.