Home / People / Harriet Cleal
Portrait of Harriet Cleal

Harriet Cleal

Senior Associate

CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP
Cannon Place
78 Cannon Street
London
EC4N 6AF
United Kingdom
Languages English, Spanish

Harriet Cleal is a senior associate in the Pensions Team. She joined CMS as a trainee solicitor in 2014 after studying economics and law, and qualified into the Pensions department after training there for six months. She advises defined benefit and defined contribution clients on a wide range of advisory and contentious matters, as well as on the pensions aspects of corporate transactions. 

more less

Relevant experience

  • Various energy sector pension clients in relation to the complex rules for ex-public sector schemes, including the Protected Persons requirements and pensions interactions with OfGem's regulatory framework. 
  • A trustee client on the merger of three large defined benefit schemes into a newly established plan.  
  • DC and hybrid schemes in relation to a bulk transfer to a master trust, including on issues arising in relation to gated funds, GMP underpins to DC benefits, protected pension ages, protected tax free cash entitlements and regulatory requirements around default funds. 
  • Trustees and employers on de-risking and liability management exercises such as enhanced transfer value exercises, pension increase exchange exercises, buy-ins and buy-outs.
  • Trustee clients with schemes which have fallen into a PPF assessment period, including advising on transfer to the PPF, a PPF+ buy-out and ongoing technical matters during the assessment period. 
  • A client on a successful defence to an investigation by The Pensions Regulator.
  • Several sets of pension scheme trustees on their transition of administration services to a new provider, including contractual review, member communications and engaging with project managers through each stage of the transition. 
more less

Memberships & Roles

  • Member, the Association of Pensions Lawyers.
more less

Publications

  • Contributor to the Pensions Law Handbook (15th Edition), Bloomsbury Professional.
more less

Education

  • 2011 – Law, Cambridge University, Cambridge.
  • 2008 – Economics, Bristol University, Bristol.
more less

Feed

01/10/2021
Cli­mate Change
The Act in­serts new sec­tions in­to PA95 provid­ing for reg­u­la­tions re­quir­ing oc­cu­pa­tion­al pen­sion schemes to man­age the ef­fects of cli­mate change as a fin­an­cial risk and to re­port on how they have done so in line with TCFD re­com­mend­a­tions. These new re­quire­ments ini­tially ap­ply from 1 Oc­to­ber 2021 to schemes with £5 bil­lion or more in as­sets (and au­thor­ised mas­ter trusts and CDC schemes). This will then be rolled out to schemes with £1 bil­lion or more in as­sets from 1 Oc­to­ber 2022. Two sets of reg­u­la­tions on cli­mate change gov­ernance and re­port­ing have come in­to force and DWP guid­ance has been pub­lished. TPR has con­sul­ted on its own guid­ance on how it will en­force the new rules. The reg­u­la­tions also provide that trust­ees of schemes in scope must have know­ledge and un­der­stand­ing of the risks and op­por­tun­it­ies for pen­sion schemes arising from cli­mate change. Even those schemes that are not large enough to be sub­ject to man­dat­ory TCFD re­port­ing im­me­di­ately are strongly en­cour­aged by the PCRIG guid­ance to ad­opt ro­bust gov­ernance pro­ced­ures re­lat­ing to cli­mate risk and later move to re­port­ing (in an­ti­cip­a­tion of the re­quire­ments ap­ply­ing to all schemes by 2025).The reg­u­la­tions make clear that the onus is firmly on trust­ees to com­ply with the new re­quire­ments with some guid­ance on how to over­see those as­sist­ing the trust­ees with cli­mate-re­lated gov­ernance. Trust­ees must carry out scen­ario ana­lys­is, ob­tain data, cal­cu­late and use met­rics and meas­ure per­form­ance against trust­ee-set tar­gets “as far as they are able”. This means tak­ing all such steps as are reas­on­able and pro­por­tion­ate in the par­tic­u­lar cir­cum­stances tak­ing in­to ac­count the costs, or likely costs, to the scheme and the time re­quired to be spent by the trust­ees or people act­ing on their be­half. The “as far as they are able” re­quire­ment does not ap­ply to the gov­ernance and re­port­ing part of the re­gime which will be man­dat­ory for schemes in scope (with reg­u­lat­ory fines for non-com­pli­ance).