Home / People / Lee Gluyas

Lee Gluyas

Partner

Lee Gluyas

Lee Gluyas

Partner

CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP
Cannon Place
78 Cannon Street
London
EC4N 6AF
United Kingdom
Languages English, French

Lee is a commercial lawyer who specialises in the resolution of disputes, particularly those arising out of IT projects, outsourcing agreements and contracts relating to the provision of telecommunications services.  He acts for clients across various industry sectors, including the financial services, real estate, facilities management, automotive, retail and energy sectors.

Lee is a solicitor-advocate with over 25 years' experience of litigation, arbitration (ICC, LCIA, AAA) and mediation.  In addition to representing clients in legal proceedings, he also advises on the renegotiation of terms of delivery and settlement of disputes by way of mediation and other processes.

He also advises clients on issues relating to the use of AI technologies and data security.  He is a regular speaker at conferences on issues concerning the use, and misuse, of IT.

more less

"Considered in his thinking" and "thorough"

Chambers & Partners

"Considered and calm"

Legal 500

"Considered in his thinking" and "thorough"

Chambers & Partners

"Considered and calm"

Legal 500

Relevant experience

  • A global IT supplier in a claim involving allegations of fraud, negligent misrepresentation and breach of contract in the delivery of a customer relationship management system.
  • An international IT supplier in proceedings arising from the implementation of an insurance platform.
  • An international insurance company in proceedings against an IT supplier relating to the delivery of a disaster recovery system.
  • A logistics and distribution company in the healthcare sector in a dispute with a service provider relating to a field management system.
  • An IT supplier in arbitration proceedings against an energy company concerning the delivery of a trading and risk management system.
  • A major high-street and online retailer in a dispute arising out of a contract for the implementation of an Oracle retail management system.
  • A financial institution in a dispute with an IT service provider in relation to the implementation of a treasury system.
  • A property management company in a series of related arbitrations against a telecommunications company.
  • A provider of telecommunications and ICT services in a dispute with another international telecommunications provider.
  • A trade body in a dispute with a provider of IT hardware and software.
  • A multinational IT supplier in arbitration proceedings brought by a reseller of software products.
  • A leading producer of motion pictures in a proceedings relating to allegations of inducement of breach of contract.
  • The administrators of a bridging finance company in a series of claims against various professional advisors.
more less

Education

  • 1991 – Law Society Finals, College of Law, Chester
  • 1990 – LL.B, University of Leicester
more less

Memberships

  • Society for Computers & Law (Committee member)
  • ICT Arbitration Club (Committee member)
  • ITechLaw
  • Commercial Litigators Forum
more less

Publications

  • Whose fault is it anyway? Why IT projects fail. Society for Computers and Law, July 2020, with William Hooper.
  • The future landscape for AI claims around the world.  Insurance Day, Dec 2019.
  • Whose fault is it anyway? Why IT projects fail (Part 1: the customer’s fault). Outsource Magazine, September 2015, with William Hooper.
  • Whose fault is it anyway? Why IT projects fail (Part 2: the supplier’s fault). Outsource Magazine, September 2015, with William Hooper.
  • The IT Frontline.  Compliance Monitor, March 2015.
more less

Lectures list

  • Managing IT Project Disputes. LexisNexis webinar, 20 April 2016.
more less

Expertise

Feed

Show only
11 September 2020
Fu­ture Fa­cing Dis­putes - Is there a fu­ture for robo-dir­ect­ors?
‘Robo-dir­ect­ors’ and ‘Robo-ad­visors’ - li­ab­il­ity for bad de­cisions based on AI tech­no­lo­gies AI tech­no­lo­gies are in­creas­ingly in­flu­en­cing the de­cisions we make in our private and pro­fes­sion­al...
Publication Dispute Resolution
28 September 2020
Eng­lish courts will not con­sider train­ing or reg­u­la­tion of for­eign law­yers...
The Com­mer­cial Court has held that com­mu­nic­a­tions between a Rus­si­an busi­ness and its in-house leg­al de­part­ment were priv­ileged even though they would not have been en­titled to the equi­val­ent pro­tec­tion...
Law-Now Dispute Resolution
25 June 2020
Fu­ture Fa­cing Dis­putes - UK Re­forms to Fuel Claims In­volving Self-Driv­ing...
As we see a rise in tech­no­lo­gies that rely on AI, claims in­volving con­nec­ted and auto­mated vehicles (CAVs) are likely to be­come a “road test” for oth­er emer­ging tech­no­lo­gies, from house­hold ro­bots...
Publication Dispute Resolution
27 July 2020
High Court de­cides first case on non-party ac­cess to court files fol­low­ing...
The High Court has re­jec­ted a non-party’s re­quest for ac­cess to ad­di­tion­al tri­al doc­u­ments on the basis that the re­quest did not ad­vance the open justice prin­ciple and also con­firmed that the le­git­im­ate...
Law-Now Dispute Resolution
21 March 2019
CMS Fin­an­cial In­sti­tu­tions Op­er­a­tion­al Re­si­li­ence Re­port
In Ju­ly 2018, the Bank of Eng­land, the FCA and the PRA re­leased a Dis­cus­sion Pa­per (DP 18/4): “Build­ing the UK fin­an­cial sec­tor’s op­er­a­tion­al re­si­li­ence” re­quest­ing feed­back by 5 Oc­to­ber 2018...
Publication
20 July 2020
Fun­der li­able to pay sub­stan­tial ad­verse costs in group lit­ig­a­tion
The court’s costs judg­ment in Sharp v Blank [2020] EWHC 1870 (Ch) high­lights the per­ils of com­plex, high-stakes group lit­ig­a­tion for in­di­vidu­al claimants and lit­ig­a­tion fun­ders alike. Hav­ing dis­missed...
Law-Now Dispute Resolution
15 March 2019
Ad­vising the Board on Tech­no­logy Op­er­a­tion­al Risk
Dir­ect­ors’ risk re­port All busi­nesses are de­pend­ent on their IT sys­tems and the de­ploy­ment of tech­no­logy is a board-level is­sue.Dir­ect­ors should be in­volved in de­cisions con­cern­ing the se­lec­tion of...
Publication Risk, Resilience & Reputation
01 July 2020
Eng­lish court sets aside de­fault judg­ment after ser­vice at a closed build­ing...
How do the Civil Pro­ced­ure Rules (CPR), de­signed for an era be­fore wide­spread elec­tron­ic com­mu­nic­a­tion, re­spond to a pub­lic health emer­gency that makes it dif­fi­cult or im­possible for many parties to deal...
Law-Now Dispute Resolution
17 December 2018
Trans­form­ing health and so­cial care
In­dustry per­spect­ives on the op­por­tun­it­ies and chal­lenges of AI At a roundtable event in Lon­don in Septem­ber 2018, CMS as­sembled a se­lec­tion of health­care op­er­at­ors, in­dustry ex­perts, healthtech com­pan­ies...
Publication Artificial Intelligence
21 May 2020
Play nicely - con­trac­tu­al per­form­ance in the time of COV­ID-19
Busi­nesses in al­most every sec­tor are fa­cing chal­lenges brought about by an un­pre­ced­en­ted op­er­a­tion­al cli­mate. In those cir­cum­stances, parties are hav­ing to con­sider wheth­er and how to meet their con­trac­tu­al...
Law-Now Coronavirus (COVID-19)
19 November 2018
The fu­ture land­scape for AI claims around the world
Gov­ern­ments and reg­u­lat­ory bod­ies around the world are be­gin­ning to en­act the le­gis­la­tion and reg­u­lat­ory meas­ures re­quired to fa­cil­it­ate the fur­ther de­vel­op­ment and im­ple­ment­a­tion of AI sys­tems. There...
Publication Artificial Intelligence
05 February 2019
Court of Ap­peal con­firms dis­tinc­tion between "in­form­a­tion cases" and "ad­vice...
The Court of Ap­peal has found that Grant Thornton (GT) was not li­able for com­mer­cial losses in­curred by the Manchester Build­ing So­ci­ety (MBS) as a res­ult of en­ter­ing in­to in­terest rate swap agree­ments...
Law-Now Banking & Finance
Load more articles