CMS Expert Guide to employment termination law and legislation

Global comparison

1. Dismissal of employees

1.1 Reasons for dismissal

The employer must establish a real and serious reason to dismiss an employee.

It may be:

  • a personal reason, notably a fault (disciplinary ground), poor performance, disablement of the employee when the employer is unable to relocate / redeploy him to another position or make reasonable adjustments to his post; or
  • an economic reason, such as economic difficulties, technological changes or the absolute necessity of restructuring to safeguard competitiveness. The economic reason is analysed at the level of the group’s companies established in France operating in the same business sector. The redeployment obligation for economic dismissal is limited to jobs available “in French territory in the company or in other companies of the group, the organisation, activities, and operating location of which allows mobility of some or all of the personnel“;
  • the refusal to amend the employment contract following a collective performance agreement

The reasons for regular termination as set out in the Labour Act are as follows:

  • if the need for work ceases to exist for economic, technical or organisational reasons (‘notice due to business reasons’); or
  • the employee is incapable of fulfilling his employment-related duties due to certain personal characteristics or qualifications (‘notice due to personal reasons’); or
  • the employee intentionally breaches a contractual obligation (‘notice due to misconduct’); or
  • if the employee did not satisfy the employer’s requirements during the probationary period.

Generally, employees in Hungary are not required to justify ordinary dismissals (“felmondás”) in case of an open-ended employment relationship. Nevertheless, they must observe prescribed notice periods.

If the employer terminates an open-ended employment relationship, as general rule, it must provide a reason for it, which has to be in connection with (i) the behaviour; (ii) skill; (iii) health status of the employee; or (iv) the operation of the employer. However, the employer is not required to give reasons for terminating a permanent employment relationship if the employee in question qualifies as a pensioner.

Certain “vulnerable” employees enjoy additional protection against dismissal (e.g. a more serious infringement to justify a dismissal, an obligation to seek another job profile for the employee in specific cases, etc.). These include women or single parents until their child reaches three years of age as well employees within the five-year period prior to the statutory age limit for a retirement pension.

The employer shall be permitted to terminate a fixed-term employment relationship by notice (i) if undergoing liquidation or bankruptcy proceedings; (ii) for reasons related to the employee’s ability; or (iii) if maintaining the employment relationship is no longer possible due to unavoidable external reasons.

Employees are required to give reasons for terminating their fixed-term employment relationship. The reason given for termination may only be of a nature that would render maintaining the employment relationship impossible or would cause unreasonable difficulties in light of his/her circumstances.

Discriminatory dismissals or dismissals due to “illegal reasons” can be challenged by employees before the relevant court.

1.2 Form

The stages in the individual dismissal procedure are as follows:

  • The employee is formally invited to a preliminary meeting.
  • At least five business days after the formal invitation, a preliminary meeting is held during which the employer explains the reasons for the contemplated dismissal and listens to the employee’s explanation.
  • The employee may be assisted by a third party (an employee of the company or an adviser of the employee mentioned on an official list prepared by the Prefect, depending on the existence of employee representative bodies in the company).
  • The dismissal letter must be sent to the employee at least two (or seven for a dismissal due to economic reasons) business days after the meeting (and within a month for a disciplinary dismissal).

The dismissal letter must be a registered letter whose receipt must be acknowledged by the employee, signed by either a legal representative of the firm or a person duly empowered by a legal representative, and who must belong to the company.

Applicable collective bargaining agreements can provide for a more favourable timeframe and / or procedure.

The letter must explicitly mention the grounds for dismissal. There are other mandatory provisions such as the possibility of choosing to benefit temporarily the supplementary health care scheme in force in the company, etc.

The grounds set out in the dismissal letter may be specified by the employer or at the employee’s request after the letter has been sent. If the employee does not make such a request, the letter’s lack of an adequate explanation will not in itself support a finding that the dismissal lacks real and serious cause, but will merely entitle the employee to compensation of no more than one month’s salary.

A special procedure (possible involvement of the works council, see below,
meeting and notification of the dismissal) applies in the case of a dismissal for economic reasons or when the dismissal concerns a ‘protected employee’ (e.g. members of the social and economic council, and trade union delegates notably).

A specific procedure prior to the dismissal exists for employees who have been recognised as physically incapable of performing their work by a labour doctor (redeployment obligation, possible involvement of the social and economic council, etc.).

For a dismissal based on a disciplinary reason, the employer should move rapidly as the procedure must begin within a few weeks of the employer becoming aware of the reason for dismissal and no more than two months after the discovery of the facts.

Written form, including reasons for termination. Decision is to be delivered to the employee.

An employment relationship can be terminated only in written form.

1.3 Notice period

The notice period is set by the applicable collective bargaining agreement and the Labour Code, and generally lasts between one and three months. The contract may be terminated without notice in the event of gross misconduct or intentional misconduct.

Regular termination: notice period ranges from two weeks to three months, dependent on the employee’s length of service with the same employer.

The three-month period is extended by an additional two weeks / one month for 50 / 55-year-old employees who have 20 or more years’ continuous service with the same employer.

Extraordinary termination (summary dismissal): no notice period. Termination during probationary period: notice period of at least seven days.

Termination by employee: notice period cannot be longer than one month if the employee has a good reason.

If the employment is terminated because the employee  breaches his contractual obligations, notice periods are halved.

The notice period is 30 calendar days, which can increase up to 90 days depending on time spent in employment. 

The parties may agree on a different duration of notice period, but not for longer than six months. 

1.4 Involvement of works council

The social and economic council must be informed and consulted (with an advisory but formal vote of its members) when a mass redundancy is planned, or for the planned dismissal of a protected employee or physically disabled employee.

The works council must be informed of the employer’s intention to dismiss. The works council‘s consent is required for dismissal of the following employees:

  • members of the works council; and
  • candidates running for works council positions and members of the election committee for a period of three months following the announcement of the results of the election to the works council; and
  • employee representatives in a body of the employer; and
  • employees with diminished ability to work and employees in immediate danger of physical disability; and
  • employees over 60 years of age.

Only in cases of the termination of the employment relationship of works council representatives. 

1.5 Involvement of a union

When a company employs more than 50 workers, trade unions may be involved in a mass redundancy procedure to negotiate an ‘employment saving plan’.

If there is no works council, consent is given by the union commissioner (the union representative employed with the respective employer). The union‘s consent is required for the dismissal of a union commissioner during their period of office and for six months thereafter.

Only in cases of the termination of the employment relationship of trade union representatives. 

1.6 Approval of state authorities necessary

This is required when dismissing ‘protected employees’ and now the validation or homologation of the employment saving plan is also required for mass redundancy procedures.

If the works council or union commissioner do not consent, consent can be substituted by a judicial or an arbitral decision.

No involvement. 

1.7 Collective redundancies

Different procedures apply according to the company’s workforce and the number of employees concerned (the procedures are ‘lighter’ in small companies that dismiss fewer than ten employees).

The main principles are the same:

  • The employer has a duty to inform and consult the staff representative bodies;
  • All documentation related to the collective redundancy must be sent to the state authorities

In case of mass redundancies (more than ten employees in a company employing at least 50 employees):

  • The employer has a duty to inform and consult the social and economic council, involving at least two meetings (the social and economic council may be assisted by an accountant in some cases). Please note that, with the new law, the duration of the consultation has been regulated.
  • An ‘employment saving plan’ (a social plan providing real alternatives and social measures accompanying the redundancy, such as redeployment, redeployment leave, training, etc.) should be drafted. There are two options for drafting it: either through a collective agreement negotiated with trade unions or unilaterally by the employer (only in the absence of trade unions in the company or if no agreement is found and then only after consultation with the social and economic council).
  • This employment saving plan should then be sent to the state authorities that will either validate it (if agreed with trade unions) or homologate it (if unilaterally drafted by the employer). If the state authorities do not agree with the plan, the employer may present another draft after consulting the social and economic council.

Employer who expects to terminate at least 20 employees, five of which due to business related reasons, all within a 90-days’ period, is obliged  to duly consult the works council / union commissioner in order to possibly reach an agreement to save the employees and / or limit the number of terminations. The employer is obliged to provide the works council / union commissioner with written information concerning the reasons for termination, total number of employees, number, professions and positions of employees who are supposed to be terminated, election criteria for such employees, amounts and way of calculating their severance payments and measures undertaken to prevent such terminations. Employer is obligated to consider and explain all possibilities and suggestions that may lead to avoidance of terminations. Also, the Croatian Employment Agency needs to be informed about the previously mentioned points and consultations with the works council / union commissioner.

When collective dismissals (“csoportos létszámcsökkentés”) are imminent, employers are required to notify the Hungarian Labour Authority 30 days in advance. For the sake of this notification procedure, collective dismissals are defined as employment terminations affecting:

  • at least ten workers in an establishment of 21 − 99 employees; or
  • 10% or more of the workforce at an establishment of 100 − 299 employees; or
  • at least 30 workers at an establishment of 300 or more employees.

The requirements of the notification procedure are met, if the employer informs the competent Labour Authority in writing and waits 30 days before carrying out the intended dismissals. Any failure to observe these rules will render all pertinent dismissals void.

1.8 Summary dismissals

The term ‘summary dismissals’ has no real meaning in France. Dismissal without a notice period is only possible where there has been a serious breach, but even in that case, the form described above for dismissal procedure, including the preliminary meeting and registered letter, must still be applied. In case of dismissal without notice, the employee has no dismissal indemnity or notice period indemnity, because there is no notice period. Such dismissed employees are still entitled to unemployment insurance benefits, however. The dismissal procedure must begin within a few weeks of the employer becoming aware of the reason for dismissal and no more than two months after the discovering of the facts.

Summary termination (summary dismissal) is defined as termination without notice, and is only lawful where there has been: 

  1. a serious breach of employment obligations, or
  2. the employment relationship between the parties is no longer possible for another important reason (there are, therefore, two possible reasons: (i) breach of employment obligations; or (ii) another important fact; in either case, the employment relationship must not be possible any longer).

The employee is to be dismissed within 15 days of the day of becoming aware of the fact / reason for dismissal.

A summary dismissal (“azonnali hatályú felmondás”) does not require observance of any particular notice periods, but must be issued within 15 days from the perception of the occurrence of the cause of the summary dismissal, but no later than one year after that occurrence of cause. Summary dismissals are possible for good reasons only, as regulated by law. Disloyalty, behaviour, untrustworthiness or persistent refusal to carry out one’s contractually agreed duties are typical reasons for a summary dismissal.

Summary dismissals are effective, even if they do not meet the abovementioned requirements. However, the summary dismissal may then be challenged by the other party before the relevant court.

1.9 Consequences if requirements are not met

The amount of damages depends on the actual loss suffered by the employee. For dismissals notified on or after 24 September 2017, the ordonnance n° 2017-1387 provides that the damages have a preset minimum and a maximum amount depending on the employee’s length of service. The ordonnance also stipulates specific lower minimum amounts for companies that usually employ fewer than 11 employees, but the maximum remains identical.

In some circumstances, the dismissal will be void, allowing the employee to request reinstatement. (These circumstances may include collective redundancies without a social plan, dismissal after an occupational injury or in discriminatory dismissals, or dismissal of a protected employee without state authority authorisation). In such a case, the compensation cannot be less than six months’ salary.

If it is decided the dismissal is illegal, the employee is to be reinstated. Reinstatement is possible even before the end of the court procedure to determine the legality of the dismissal if the employee so requests. If the parties do not wish to continue with their employment relationship, the court shall at the employee‘s request determine:

  1. the date of termination of the employment contract; and
  2. compensation for damages, which ranges from three to eight times the employee’s average monthly salary over the previous three months (depending on the employee’s age, length of contract and obligations in relation to supporting family members or other dependants as defined by family law).

Non-compliance by the terminating party with the prescribed or agreed periods or dates of notice qualifies as unlawful termination. In that case, the consequences of the unlawful termination, prescribed by the Hungarian Labour Code, can be enforced by the other party before the relevant court. As to the legal consequences of unfair termination, in case the employee is successful in claiming unfair termination, the employer is under an obligation to pay compensation for lost earnings. The Labour Code caps these damages at 12 months of absence pay. If the contract is terminated for personal reasons by regular notice, the employee could also claim a severance payment from the employer. Outside of this, the employee must prove any further damages (e.g. non-pecuniary damages) during the course of the litigation. The employee may claim reinstatement, but this is permitted only in cases such as discrimination or if the employer terminated the contract of an employee protected from dismissal. In case of reinstatement, the employee can claim lost wages for the period of litigation, which is not subject to the 12-month cap since the employment is treated as continuous.

1.10 Severance pay

Dismissal indemnity is payable unless the dismissal is due to gross misconduct or intentional misconduct. The amount payable is mainly set by the collective bargaining agreement but must not be less than 1 / 4 of the monthly salary per year of service for the first ten years of service, plus 1 / 3 of the monthly salary for each year of service after ten years. Indemnity is also payable for unused accrued holiday entitlement and for the notice period if the employer chooses to release the employee from performing it.

An employee with an open-ended contract who has two years’ continuous service with the same employer (and is not being dismissed due to an intentional breach of contractual obligation) is entitled to a severance payment. The statutory minimum severance payment is calculated by multiplying one-third of the average monthly salary in the preceding three months by the number of years’ continuous service with that employer. The severance payment is capped at six times the average monthly salary, unless otherwise provided for by law, by-law, collective agreement or work contract

An employee shall be entitled to severance pay if his/her employment relationship is terminated (i) by the employer; (ii) upon the dissolution of the employer without succession; or (iii) in case of the transfer of a business undertaking, if the transferee employer does not fall under the scope of the Hungarian Labour Code. 

Entitlement to severance pay shall only apply upon the existence of an employment relationship with the employer during the period of at least three years at the time when the notice of dismissal is delivered or when the employer is terminated without succession.

The amount of severance pay increases according to the length of the employment relationship: up to a six-month absence fee (i.e. in practical terms, the base salary).

The employee shall not be entitled to receive severance pay if (i) he/she is recognised as a pensioner at the time when the notice of dismissal is delivered or when the employer is terminated without succession; or (ii) he/she is dismissed for reasons in connection with his/her behaviour in relation to the employment relationship or on grounds other than health reasons.

1.11 Non-competition clauses

A non-competition clause is only valid if provided in the work contract, and if:

  • The employer demonstrates that this clause is necessary to safeguard his interests and proportionate (e.g. the lower is the position the less the clause is justified);
  • Its scope is limited to a reasonable area, a reasonable period of time, and precise activities; and
  • The employee receives a monthly indemnity during the term of the clause (the indemnity amount is set by the work contract or collective bargaining agreement, but is generally between 20% and 50% of the employee’s monthly salary).

This clause can be waived by the employer in the letter of dismissal or according to the provision of the applicable collective bargaining agreement and / or employment contract.

The examination of the terms of the applicable collective bargaining agreement is key on this matter.

Post-contractual non-competition clauses must last no longer than two years from the date of termination of the contract. The employer is obliged to pay compensation (at least one-half of the average monthly salary paid in the last three months of employment). The covenant will not be valid if the employee is a minor or if the employee‘s salary amounts to less than the average national salary.

The non-competition clause does not apply if: (i) the employee terminates the contract without notice period (extraordinary termination) and does not state that he does agree that the clause applies; or (ii) if the employee is dismissed without a justified reason, unless the employer undertakes to pay the prescribed remuneration for the duration of the clause.

Non-competition clauses are only valid insofar as they last for no more than two years after the termination of employment. Also, contractual penalties are possible regarding non-compliance with non-competition clauses.

In case of a post-employment non-competition agreements, the employer shall be liable to pay adequate compensation. In determining the amount of compensation, the degree of the impediment that the agreement has on the employee’s ability to find employment elsewhere, in the light of his/her education and experience, shall be taken into consideration. The amount of such compensation, for the term of the agreement, may not be less than one-third of the base salary due for the same period.

1.12 Miscellaneous

Specific and restrictive rules and procedures apply in the case of pregnant women, women on and returning from maternity leave, young fathers, and employees recovering after a work-related accident or suffering from a work-related illness. Women on maternity leave cannot be dismissed during this period.

Since 2008, a new means of termination has been introduced, namely “by mutual agreement”. This new possibility is called ‘rupture conventionnelle’ (mutual termination of the employment contract). The termination is agreed by both employer and employee and there is no cause or reason to demonstrate.

The employee is entitled to unemployment insurance benefits and dismissal indemnity provided by law or the applicable collective bargaining agreement (or more if agreed).

A strict procedure including preliminary meetings and consideration periods should be followed (both parties have the benefit of 15 calendar days to retract, from the date on which the form is signed); a specific form must be filled in and signed by both parties.

The specific form must be sent to the state authorities for agreement. The state authorities have a 15-open day period to review the form. Within these 15 days, the state authorities can agree to the termination, disagree or stay silent (silence amounts to agreement). However, the state authorities must expressly agree for protected employees. Otherwise the termination is void.

Since September 2017 it has been possible for the employer to negotiate a collective agreement through a ‘rupture conventionnelle collective’ (mass mutual termination of the employment contract) with trade unions. Such an agreement can only implement voluntary departures and thus excludes any dismissals designed to eliminate jobs. This new method of terminating contracts is entirely excluded from the rules governing economic dismissals. The labour administration is informed as soon as negotiations to conclude such an agreement start and reviews the agreement’s contents before validating it.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

2. Dismissal of managing directors

It should be noted that the title ‘managing director’ is not recognised under the Croatian Companies Act or other relevant applicable legislation. The Croatian Companies Act recognises only a ‘director’, who is authorised to represent the company and obliged to be registered as a member of the management board with the respective commercial court.

A managing director need not to have an employment agreement with the company, or any other type of agreement, in order to be able to represent the company.

Where a managing director has a  managing / service agreement  which falls under the regulation of Croatian obligatory law, only the provisions of the managing / service agreement apply. If aspects of the relationship are not dealt with in the managing / service agreement, the relevant provisions of the Croatian Obligations Act will apply.

Where a managing director does not have any employment or managing / service agreement with the company, he shall be treated as a member of the management board only.

The table below sets out the position under Croatian law with respect to the managing directors of a limited liability company, with and without service agreements.

2.1 Reasons for dismissal

The company may generally revoke the appointment of the managing director without cause, unless stated otherwise in the by-laws of the company or the resolution of appointment. However, a fair reason is legally required in certain forms of companies (e. g. the civil form or commercial forms such as certain limited companies (‘SA’) or limited liability companies (‘SARL’)).

No special reasons required (unless otherwise specified within the statute of the company or the contract itself).

Where the managing director has a service agreement, the provisions of that service agreement (and consequently the Croatian Obligations Act) will apply.

If the managing director is a member of the management board according to the statute of the company (and not only appointed by resolution of the shareholders), the company statute may set out that revocation is only possible for special reasons.

Company may revoke the appointment/terminate the service contract without cause, but in compliance with applicable notice periods and termination dates.

2.2 Form

A resolution taken by the shareholders or board of directors, depending on the form of the company and the internal organisation of the management. The managing director must be notified in writing of the revocation, and the change of managing director must be published in a public Corporate Register.

Valid shareholders’ resolution on revocation of appointment as member  of the management board. Registration of this revocation with the court registry. Termination of the service agreement in the same form in which the agreement has been signed (Obligations Act provisions shall apply).

Valid shareholder’s resolution on revocation of appointment as managing director and on termination of the service or employment contract is required. 

2.3 Notice period

There is no notice period, except where one is provided by the by-laws of the company or in the resolution of appointment of the managing director.

According to the Croatian Companies Act, the appointment of a director of the company can be revoked at any time without notice (for no special reason). Some restrictions (not strictly defined) can be set out within the statute of the company.

If the director has a service agreement, the notice period will be as set out in the service agreement.

Revocation of appointment: possible without notice.

Termination of the service or employment contract: Hungarian law does provide statutory minimum notice periods from which the parties can deviate in the contract of employment in case of Managing Directors. 

2.4 Involvement of works council

No.

No involvement.

No involvement.

2.5 Involvement of a union

Not applicable.

No involvement.

No involvement.

2.6 Approval of state authorities necessary

No.

Respective commercial court brings a resolution on registration of the resolution in the court registry. The court’s resolution and registration are declaratory.

Not required.

2.7 Collective redundancies

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

2.8 Summary dismissals

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

A summary dismissal (azonnali hatályú felmondás) does not require observance of any particular notice periods, but must be issued within fifteen days from the perception of the occurrence of the cause of the summary dismissal, but no later than one year after that occurrence of cause. Summary dismissals are possible for good reasons only, as regulated by law. Disloyalty, behaviour, untrustworthiness or persistent refusal to carry out one’s contractually agreed duties are typical reasons for a summary dismissal.

Summary dismissals are effective, even if they do not meet the abovementioned requirements. However, the other party may challenge the summary dismissal before the relevant court. 

2.9 Consequences if requirements are not met

Damages may mainly be claimed:

  • for lack of fair reason in companies where such a reason is legally required to revoke a representative; or
  • if the revocation is notified under hurtful circumstances (e.g. is very sudden and unexpected, or is publicly announced before the director is informed), or if the managing director has not been granted a reasonable opportunity to make his point before the decision to revoke him is made (absence of due process).

If there is no valid shareholder resolution, the revocation will be invalid and the court will refuse to register it in the court registry. Where the managing director has a service agreement, he could claim:

  1. compensation for damages; or
  2. fulfilment of contractual obligations in accordance with the provisions of the Croatian Obligations Act.

If there is no valid shareholder resolution, the revocation of appointment as managing director will be invalid.

It is possible for the revocation to be valid, but for the termination of the service or employment contract to be invalid. If this is the case, the managing director is entitled to continued payment of salary and adequate employment.

2.10 Severance pay

There is no mandatory severance pay for the capacity as director, unless stated otherwise in the by-laws of the company or in the resolution of appointment of the managing director.

Severance pay may be specified in the managing director’s service agreement (this is usually a large sum).

An employee shall be entitled to severance pay if his/her employment relationship is terminated (i) by the employer; (ii) upon the dissolution of the employer without succession; or (iii) in case of a transfer of the business undertaking, if the transferee employer does not fall under the scope of the Hungarian Labour Code.  

Entitlement to severance pay shall only apply upon the existence of an employment relationship with the employer during a period of at least three years at the time when the notice of dismissal is delivered or when the employer is terminated without succession. 

The amount of severance pay increases according to the length of the employment relationship up to a six-month absence fee (i.e. in practical terms, the base salary). 

The employee shall not be entitled to receive severance pay if (i) he/she is recognised as a pensioner at the time when the notice of dismissal is delivered or when the employer is terminated without succession; or (ii) he/she is dismissed for reasons in connection with his/her behaviour in relation to the employment relationship or on grounds other than health reasons.

2.11 Non-competition clauses

The terms of any non-competition clause must be agreed between the parties. If the scope of the clause is too wide (according to its geographic area, its length, or the activities it concerns), its validity may be challenged.

The managing director, as a member of the management board, is prohibited from doing the following without the approval of the supervisory board (or the shareholders, if the company does not have a supervisory board):

  1. being a member of the supervisory board or management board of another company with the same business activities; or
  2. performing business activities equal to those of the company for his or somebody else’s account; or
  3. using the company’s premises for performing business for his own or somebody else’s profit. The company is entitled to compensation for any damage caused.

Non-competition clauses are only valid insofar as they last for no more than two year after the termination of employment. Also, contractual penalties are possible regarding non-compliance with non-competition clauses. 

In case of post-employment non-competition agreements, the employer shall be liable to pay adequate compensation. In determining the amount of compensation, the degree of the impediment that the agreement has on the employee’s ability to find employment elsewhere, in the light of his/her education and experience, shall be taken into consideration. The amount of such compensation, for the term of the agreement, may not be less than one-third of the base salary due for the same period.

2.12 Miscellaneous

The director may also be an employee. In this case, a proper dismissal process will have to be implemented in addition to the revocation process and corresponding dismissal indemnities paid.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.