CMS Expert Guide to employment termination law and legislation

Global comparison

1. Dismissal of employees

1.1 Reasons for dismissal

An employer may not dismiss an employee without a legally valid cause.

Dismissal may be based on personal grounds (e.g. disciplinary dismissal, dismissal due to professional inadequacy, dismissal due to incapacity) or economic grounds (e.g. economic difficulties, technological changes), or subject to specific conditions, without stating a specific motive.

An employment agreement can be terminated by the employer and the employee can be dismissed in two different ways: with cause, when the employee has committed one of the breaches specified in the labour laws, or without cause, when the employee is dismissed at the employer’s discretion, due to redundancy or other reasons that do not necessarily need to be specified.

The difference between dismissal with cause and without cause lies in the severance payments that the employer must make to the employee upon dismissal (see below).

The labour legislation determines that an employee can be dismissed with cause for the following reasons:

  1. dishonesty;
  2. sexual harassment or inappropriate behaviour;
  3. the employee competes with the employer’s line of business or carries out other business prejudicial to the employee’s work, on his / her own or through third parties, without the permission of the employer;
  4. the criminal conviction of the employee, resulting in the employee being incarcerated and not able to attend work;
  5. poor performance;
  6. frequent drunkenness or drunkenness at work;
  7. disclosure of company secrets;
  8. insubordination or indiscipline;
  9. the employee abandons his work;
  10. insult, defamation or slander, or physical offence, carried out at work against any person, except in legitimate self-defence or in defence of a third party;
  11. insult, defamation or slander, or physical offence, carried out at work against the employer or superior, except in legitimate self-defence or in defence of a third party;
  12. frequent gambling;
  13. losing the professional qualification necessary to perform work due to the employee’s fault; and
  14. being involved in actions contrary to the national security, as duly evidenced through an administrative proceeding

The following employees have the right to stability, and cannot be dismissed without cause from their employment:

  1. pregnant employees cannot be dismissed without cause from the date the pregnancy is confirmed until five months after giving birth to the child;
  2. an employee who suffers an accident at work and is prevented from attending work for at least 15 days cannot be dismissed without cause for a period of one year, counted from the date the employee returns to work; and
  3. an employee elected president of the internal commission for accident prevention cannot be dismissed without cause from the date he registers to run for the position until one year after the end of his / her tenure.

In addition to dismissal of the employee with cause or without cause, the employer and the employee can amicably agree to terminate the employment agreement. In such a case, lower severance payments are due (see below).

Turkish law foresees two types of dismissals for employees: ordinary termination and extraordinary termination. Each type of termination is then further differentiated according to whether the employment security terms are applicable (as outlined below).

Ordinary Termination

Where the employment security provisions apply to the dismissed employee

Whether the employer is obligated to rely on a reason in an ordinary termination depends on whether the employee to be dismissed benefits from “employment security provisions” applicable under Turkish law.

Employment security provisions would be applicable to an employee if:

  1. The employer in question employs at least 30 employees; and
  2. The employee in question has been employed by the said employer for at least six months based on an indefinite term employment agreement.

If the conditions above are satisfied and the employee benefits from employment security provisions, the employer is obligated to supply a valid reason to dismiss such employee. Turkish law does not provide an exhaustive list of valid reasons for termination. However, the following reasons provided under the law are generally considered as guidelines   for this purpose:

  1. The employee is incapable of performing their duties or they behave in an unacceptable manner;
  2. Business necessity; or
  3. Workplace necessity.

Where the employment security provisions do not apply to the dismissed employee

Where the conditions for employment security are not applicable, an ordinary termination does not need to be justified (i.e. the employer may dismiss the employee without having to supply any grounds).

However, where the employee has been terminated in bad faith, they may claim a “bad faith compensation” (kötü niyet tazminatı). For further details, please see our explanation regarding Consequences if requirements are not met below.

Rules applicable without regard to employment security provisions

In an ordinary termination, the employer is obligated to observe the statutory notification periods regardless of whether the employee in question benefits from employment security provisions. For further details regarding such periods, please see our explanations below regarding Notice periods.

Furthermore, any employee who has been employed for at least one year will be entitled to severance payment upon an ordinary termination of their employment. For further details regarding severance payment, please see our responses below to Consequences if requirements are not met and Severance pay.

Lastly, upon the ordinary termination, the employer is obligated to grant the employee the right to seek new employment during the notification period. Accordingly, an employee will be allowed at least two hours per day to find new employment (unless the employment is terminated immediately by way of paying the employee an amount corresponding to his / her notification period, as indicated in our explanations below in Consequences if requirements are not met).

Extraordinary Termination

In the presence of just reasons, Turkish law provides employers the right to dismiss an employee immediately without having to comply with any notification periods and, in certain instances, without having to pay any severance pay as further detailed in our responses to Severance pay below.

Turkish law does not provide an exhaustive list of just reasons for extraordinary termination but the following reasons indicated under the law are considered to give guidelines as to what constitutes a just reason:

  1. Health reasons;
  2. Acts of the employee breaching moral principles and principle of good faith or similar situations;
  3. Force Majeure; and
  4. Apprehension or detention of the employee

Please note that the distinction based on the applicability of employment security provisions explained above for an ordinary termination is also applicable for an extraordinary termination.

Please see our responses below regarding Consequences if requirements are not met for further details of the legal ramifications of an unjust termination (i.e. where the termination is absent of the alleged just reasons).

1.2 Form

The employee must be notified of the dismissal in writing.

The employer must notify the employee of the dismissal in writing. In addition, the parties must execute a term of termination, and the employer must register the dismissal in the employee’s employment booklet and inform the competent authorities.

As a matter of validity, notice (bildirim) for dismissal must be in writing and signed by the employee to confirm they have received such notice. In addition, it is advisable to have two witnesses present at the time of notice to evidence a possible refusal by the employee to take receipt of the termination notice.

It is also advisable to send an official notification (tebligat) to the employee’s registered address of residence following due receipt of the termination notice (or refusal of the same) to ensure that the employee is duly notified of the termination. For such purpose, specific rules under the notification procedures legislation shall become applicable.

Lastly, please note that an employee may not be terminated due to his / her performance or behaviour without granting such employee a right to defend himself / herself.

1.3 Notice period

In the event of dismissal, the law provides that an employee is entitled to a notice of a duration which varies depending on his seniority as follows:

  • Length of service of less than six months: no notice period applicable;
  • Length of service between six months and less than two years: one month;
  • Length of service of at least two years: two months.

For any dismissal, the employer may choose whether the employee works during the notice period.

In either case, employee is entitled to receive the same salary, including any benefits.

Except in cases of termination with cause, where no prior notice is required, or if a longer notice period is stipulated in the employment agreement, employees must be notified of the dismissal at least 30 days in advance.

In addition to the 30-day notice period, the employee must receive payment in lieu of an additional “notice period” equivalent to the salary for three days per year of employment up to a maximum of 90 days. If no dismissal notice or less than a 30-day notice is given, the employer is obliged to pay the employee the salary that would otherwise be due for the full 30-day
notice period.

Ordinary Termination

For an ordinary termination explained above, the notice periods depend on the length of employment. The relevant periods are as follows:

  1. For employees whose term of employment is shorter than six months, the statutory period is two weeks;
  2. For employees whose term of employment is between six months and one and a half years, the statutory period is four weeks;
  3. For employees whose term of employment is between one and a half years and three years, the statutory period is six weeks; and
  4. For employees whose term of employment is longer than three years, the statutory period is eight weeks.

In principle, Turkish law allows for the employer and the employee to agree on extended notification periods. However, the Turkish Court of Appeals has made at least one ruling where it has stated that an employee, upon his / her termination of the employment, would only be bound to observe the periods indicated above (and not those agreed under the employment agreement). Therefore, if the employee terminates his / her employment, he / she may not be required to observe a notification period longer than those prescribed under the law (as indicated above).

Extraordinary Termination

For an extraordinary termination, a notice period does not need to be observed by the employer (i.e. the dismissal will be effective immediately).

However, in an unjust termination (where the alleged just reasons for termination do not exist), compensation pertaining to the notification periods will be applicable. For further details, please see below our responses to Consequences if requirements are not met.

1.4 Involvement of works council

Works councils do not exist in Monaco. A staff representative (if established) must be properly informed prior to a collective redundancies.

Not necessary.

No involvement.

1.5 Involvement of a union

No involvement for dismissals.

No involvement normally, other than in the case of a program of collective voluntary dismissal (see below).

A union will be involved in the dismissal of employees if collective employment agreements have been entered into by employees’ unions and employers (or employers’ unions) that foresee the establishment of certain bodies (composed of the representatives of labour unions and the employers) (e.g. disciplinary boards) authorized to make advisory opinions on dismissals. While such advisory opinion is not directly binding on the employer, Turkish courts may still determine that a termination that goes against such opinion is an invalid termination.

1.6 Approval of state authorities necessary

Mandatory for employees with legal protection because of their private life or their mandate.

This protection applies to staff representatives, union delegates, pregnant women, employees taking maternity leave, paternity leave, adoption leave or family support leave, members of the Labour Court, harassment referents.

The relevant Labour Authority has to be informed of projected collective redundancies prior to their dismissal, and grant prior approval.

Not necessary.

Not necessary.

1.7 Collective redundancies

The implementation of collective redundancies is mainly regulated by law and the National Collective Bargaining Agreement, which imposes some procedural steps prior to implementing any such decision.

Three main issues must be considered regarding the preparation and implementation of a collective social plan:

  • Drafting an information document containing all essential elements

regarding the decision to restructure, its motivation, its implementation and the measures taken by the employer to minimise any adverse impacts on employees;

  • Circulating the information to staff representatives, discussing it with them and collecting their comments and choices about measures taken to implement the restructuring (i.e., the measures adopted to minimise the number of dismissals); and
  • Implementing the restructuring plan, by obtaining the required authorisations as the case may be, notifying employees of their terminations and paying termination indemnities.

There is no requirement in Brazil for any specific measure to be taken in case of collective redundancies. However, the employer may elect to agree with the employees’ union to a programme of collective voluntary dismissal. Under such a programme, the employer can be authorised to make reduced severance payments for employees who voluntarily choose to adhere to it. From the employer’s perspective, the programme allows the employer to pay less than it would otherwise pay to employees who are dismissed without cause. For employees, the programme can be beneficial as they may be able to receive some indemnification that they would otherwise not have be entitled to had they decided to terminate their employment agreement themselves.

Collective redundancy is recognized under Turkish law and the relevant provisions will be applicable when the employment of the following numbers of employees are terminated on the same day or within a period of one month following the same procedures and principles as termination with a valid reason:

  1. Ten employees in a workplace where 20 – 100 employees are employed;
  2. 10% of employees in a workplaces where 101 – 300 employees are employed; or
  3. 30 employees in a workplace where at least 301 employees are employed

Collective redundancy is subject to judicial review upon petition by the employees. The judicial review will determine whether the collective redundancy has been implemented for valid reasons and the necessary conditions have been satisfied. For such purposes, the court will make use of data from all types of workplace records and expert opinions, and will reach its own decision.

Certain procedures must also be followed for the due implementation of a collective redundancy. To elaborate, where a collective redundancy is in question, the employer is obligated to inform the regional Directorate of the Employment and Social Security Ministry and Turkish Employment Office at least 30 days before the implementation of such collective redundancy. In the event that the employer does not inform the relevant state institutions, it will incur an administrative fine of TL 857 (app. EUR 141) (as of 2019) for every employee affected by the collective redundancy.

It should also be noted that the notification period for the termination starts within one month of having informed the relevant state institution. Without such notification, notification periods for the termination cannot be duly initiated.

1.8 Summary dismissals

Dismissal without notice is only possible in case of gross misconduct. In such a case, the employee receives no dismissal indemnity or notice period indemnity. The employee is still entitled to unemployment insurance benefits.

Summary dismissals (dismissals without notice) are only permitted for dismissals with cause. For dismissal without cause, a 30-day prior notice is generally required (see above). However, the employer may elect to provide financial compensation for the prior notice period. In this case, the employer has to pay to the employee the salary the employee would have earned during the 30-day prior notice, and the employee is not required to work during this period.

Please see above our explanation regarding extraordinary termination.

1.9 Consequences if requirements are not met

Should the employer dismiss an employee on personal or economic grounds without a valid cause, the employer would have to pay a dismissal indemnity.

In addition, the employee could claim damages for injuries suffered due to his / her wrongful dismissal.

The employee may have various claims against the employer related to his dismissal. For example, in case of dismissal for cause, the employee may have a claim for unfair dismissal and require payment of the severance dues that would have been payable for a dismissal without cause. In case of a dismissal without cause, the employee may have a claim with respect to the severance payments received, or other employment-related rights accrued during the employment term which were not paid.

Employment claims are made before specialised labour courts in Brazil.

There are different consequences under Turkish law for an ordinary termination and an extraordinary termination in which a valid or just reason is absent. These are as follows:

Ordinary Termination

Where the employment security provisions apply to the dismissed employee

In this scenario, the notification periods indicated above must be observed by employers when terminating an employee. As such, the employer would be obligated to either

  1. Allow the employee to work during the notification period (duly paying him / her for the work performed during such the period); or
  2. Pay the amount corresponding to the notification period if the employer wishes to terminate the employee immediately.

In addition to this, in case of a termination, the employee may seek remedy before a mediator and if the matter is not resolved before the mediator, then the employee will be entitled to initiate a “lawsuit for re-instatement” (işe iade davası), in each case claiming that such dismissal is not based on one of the valid reasons explained above.

Where the parties are unable to resolve this dispute before the mediator and this matter is referred to a court and the said court determines that the ordinary termination is absent of a valid reason, it will render a judgement about:

  1. The re-instatement of the employee to the position he / she held prior to termination; and
  2. The amount of compensation the employer is obligated to pay to the employee in case the employer will not re-instate the employee.

If the employer re-instates the employee, it is obligated to pay to the employee a (maximum) amount equal to four months’ salary as well as any other receivables of the employee, which is meant to compensate the employee for the duration of the lawsuit during which the employee did not work.

If the employee chooses not to re-instate the employee, it is obligated to pay compensation to the employee equal to

  1. Four months’ salary as well as any other receivables of the employee, which is meant to compensate the employee for the duration of the lawsuit during which the employee did not work; and
  2. Four to eight months’ salary as compensation for undue termination.

In both scenarios, the salary taken as the basis for the compensation amount is the monthly salary the employee received immediately prior to termination.

Lastly, amounts corresponding to unused leave periods (if any) will also become payable to the employee.

Where the employment security provisions do not apply to the dismissed employee

In this case, the employer must observe the notification periods or make the corresponding payments as indicated above in our responses to paragraph Where the employment security provisions apply to the dismissed employee.

In addition to the above, if the employment has been terminated in bad faith (e.g. solely to avoid paying certain receivables to an employee, due to the employee’s involvement with a labour union etc.), the employer would be obligated to pay a bad faith compensation. Such compensation is equal to three times the amount pertaining to the notification periods of the employee.

Lastly, amounts corresponding to unused leave periods (if any) will also become payable to the employee.

Severance Payment

Any employee who has been employed for at least one year will benefit from severance payment upon ordinary termination of his employment relation by the employer regardless of whether the employee benefited from employment security provisions. For further details, please see our responses to Severance pay below.

Extraordinary Termination

Where the employment security provisions apply to the dismissed employee

In this scenario, as the dismissal will be effective immediately, in the absence of such just cause for termination, the employer would be obligated to compensate the employee for the amount pertaining to the notification periods (as indicated above).

Furthermore, the employee will also be entitled to initiate a lawsuit for re- instatement. Please see our responses above to Where the employment security provisions apply to the dismissed employee regarding the possible outcomes of such lawsuit.

Lastly, amounts corresponding to unused leave periods (if any) will also become payable to the employee.

Where the employment security provisions do not apply to the dismissed employee

In this case, as the dismissal will be effective immediately, in the absence of such just cause for termination, the employer would be obligated to compensate the employee for the amounts pertaining to the notification periods (as indicated above).

The bad faith compensation indicated in our responses above to Where the employment security provisions do not apply to the dismissed employee are also be applicable in this case.

Lastly, amounts corresponding to unused leave periods (if any) will become payable to the employee.

Severance Payment

If the employee was employed for at least one year, he / she will benefit from a severance payment upon an unjust termination of his / her employment regardless of whether he / she benefited from employment security provisions.

For further details, please see our responses to Severance pay below.

1.10 Severance pay

Dismissal indemnity is payable unless the dismissal is for gross misconduct. The amount payable is mainly set by the collective bargaining agreement, but must not be less than the French legal dismissal indemnity (since 27 September 2017: 25% of the monthly gross salary until ten years of seniority and one third of the monthly salary as of the tenth‘s year). A higher indemnity is payable in case of dismissal without a stated motive. Indemnity is also payable for unused accrued paid holidays and for the notice period if the employer chooses to release the employee from performing it.

In case of dismissal for cause, no severance pay is due to the employee.

In such cases the employer must only make payments related to rights the employee accrued during the employment period, which can include pro-rata payment for accrued holiday entitlements (1 / 12 of the employee’s holiday pay for each month of the incomplete holiday accrual period at the time of dismissal (such holiday pay being, in full, equivalent to one monthly salary plus an additional 1 / 3 of monthly salary), proportional 13th salary (1 / 12 of one monthly salary for each month worked in the then current calendar year), as well as double payment for any overdue holiday periods (i. e., holiday periods not enjoyed by the employee within 12 months of the employee acquiring the right to enjoy such holiday period).

If the employee is dismissed without cause, the employer must pay to the employee, in addition to the payment of accrued rights and as a penalty for unfair dismissal, an amount equal to 40 % of that which the employer has deposited into the employee’s severance compensation fund (“FGTS”) during his / her employment. In addition, the employer must pay a further 10 % of the amount deposited into the FGTS to the government. Every month, employers are required to deposit 8 % of the employee’s monthly salary into his / her FGTS account, which is managed by the Federal Savings Bank on behalf of the employee. Thus, this penalty will depend on the length of employment and on the amount of the employee’s monthly salary.

If the dismissal is amicably agreed to between the employee and the employer, the employer will have to pay half of (a) the financial compensation for prior notice, if the parties agree that the prior notice will be financially compensated for instead of the employee actually working during such period, and (b) the penalty equivalent to 40 % of the amount the employer has deposited into the employee’s FGTS (i. e., 20 % of the amount deposited into the FGTS).

All other termination payments, such as amounts due in respect of accrued rights, should be fully paid.

In cases of fixed term employment contracts where there is no provision allowing the parties to terminate the agreement early without cause and the employer opts for early termination without cause, the employer must pay the employee half of the amount the employee would otherwise have been entitled to receive during the remainder of the agreement term.

As indicated above, in an ordinary termination, employees who have worked for the employer in question for at least one year, will be entitled to severance pay regardless of whether they benefited from employment security provisions prior to termination and even if there was a valid reason for their dismissal.

As for an extraordinary termination, employees who have worked for the employer in question for at least one year will be entitled to severance pay if they were terminated based on any grounds other than “acts breaching moral principles and principle of good faith or similar situations”. Further, an employee will be entitled to severance pay at any rate if he / she was terminated on an unjust basis (i.e. if the alleged just reasons for termination do not exist).

Regarding the amount of the severance payment, note that upon termination, an employee, in principle, is entitled to 30 days of pay for each year of employment prior to termination. However, this payment is subject to a ceiling of approximately TL 7,117 (EUR 800,subject to an inflation markup bi-annually). Consequently, even if the 30 day salary of the employee was higher than TL 7,117, the employee may only receive this amount as severance payment for each year of employment.

For calculation of the severance pay, the gross salary will include tax and security premiums deducted from the salary as well as additional moneys and monetary rights provided to the employee, including bonuses, child support payments, and monetary assistance in relation to health and transportation to and from work.

1.11 Non-competition clauses

Non-competition clauses are enforceable in Monaco provided they are appropriately restricted.

A non-competition clause must comply with five cumulative conditions:

  • it must be essential to protect the employer’s legitimate interests;
  • it must be limited to a specific time period;
  • it must be limited to a geographical area;
  • it must take the characteristics of the employee’s job into account; and
  • most importantly, it must provide for a financial counterpart.

Independent consideration is required for a non-competition clause.

The law does not deal with the validity of non-compete clauses. Currently, the validity of such clauses is still being debated at the labour courts. On the one hand, some courts understand that non-compete clauses breach the constitutional rights of all persons to carry out any work, profession or activity of their own choosing, provided the professional qualifications are met. On the other hand, other decisions have confirmed the validity of non-compete clauses, provided some restrictions are included, such as:

  1. the non-compete clause shall be reasonably limited in time and to a certain geographic area;
  2. the restriction shall be related to the activities the performed during his / her employment, and it shall be necessary and reasonable to protect a relevant interest of the employer;
  3. the employee shall be entitled to receive financial compensation if he / she is restricted from work due to the non-compete provision; and
  4. the non-compete clause shall be agreed on at the outset of the employment.

During the term of the employment agreement, employees are under a non-compete obligation as per the terms of Turkish law.

For any non-compete obligations to prevail after the employment relationship, they must be limited by time and geographical scope so as not to prejudice the economic well-being of the employee.

From a timing perspective, Turkish law, in principle, allows for a two-year period as a valid non-compete term starting from the termination of the employment relationship. As for the geographical scope, Turkish law requires that the non-compete obligation is limited to certain regions or cities where the employment of the employee by a competitor would be most detrimental for the initial employer. Where a non-compete obligation is found to be in excess of the said limitations, it will be limited by Turkish courts. Accordingly, in a dispute, the court will not take into account the contractual non- compete obligation but determine the scope of the non-compete obligation that could duly be agreed between the parties and proceed on that basis.

There is no specific regulation or established precedent under Turkish law regarding a non-compete in favour of a third person who is not the actual employer of the employee in question (e.g. the parent company of the employer). As such, it is likely that a non-compete obligation in favour of such third person would be unenforceable under  Turkish law.

1.12 Miscellaneous

Not applicable.

The above rules and guidelines apply to private employment agreements. Public officials and public employees are generally subject to a specific employment regime which, among other things, provides for employee stability, meaning that they cannot be dismissed without cause after a probation period.

It should be noted that Turkish courts are extremely employee friendly. Therefore, complying with the necessary principles and procedures with regard to a termination is essential. For this purpose, all the relevant documents (e.g. the employment agreement) must be reviewed very carefully and all notices and notifications (i.e. the termination notices / notifications) must be prepared in a diligent manner and duly served.

Lastly, Turkish employers are obligated to treat employees equally and where a termination has been effected on a discriminatory basis, an employee may claim a discrimination compensation (ayrımcılık tazminatı). Such compensation will equal four months’ of the employee’s salary when subject to discrimination as well as any further receivables the employee should have received had he / she not been subject to such discrimination.

2. Dismissal of managing directors

In Brazil, the rights and obligations of a ‘director’ are the same whether they are for a ‘managing director’ or any other type of director. Although this is not the normal practice, a director may also be an employee of the company. If that is the case, the relationship between the company and the director will be subject to labour laws, as well as to the legal / statutory rules applicable to the appointment / dismissal and duties / responsibilities of directors. This table only covers the removal of managing directors from their positions as director, and does not cover termination of any contract of employment or other employment issues.

2.1 Reasons for dismissal

A company may generally revoke the appointment of the managing director without cause, unless stated otherwise in the by-laws of the company or the resolution of appointment. This is particularly the case for limited companies (‘SA‘). However, a just cause is legally required in limited liability companies (‘SARL’) when revoking a managing director who is also a shareholder of the company. In any event, revocation must follow mandatory steps to be declared valid.

A managing director may be dismissed at any time for any reason, unless the articles of association or bylaws of the company provide otherwise.

First, Turkish law only recognizes a distinction between the termination of employees and

  1. Employer representatives and deputy employer representatives who manage an enterprise in its entirety; and
  2. Employer representatives who manage a workplace in its entirety and who are authorized to employ and dismiss employees.

(Persons in (i) and (ii) above are collectively referred to as “Managers” for the purposes of this Guide)

For the purposes of (i) above, employer representatives and deputy employer representatives are usually considered to be the general managers (genel müdür) and deputy general managers (genel müdür yardımcısı), respectively, of the relevant entities. Managing directors should fall in the scope of “general managers” as explained above.

As for (ii) above, any person who has been given both powers indicated in it will also be subject to the regime explained below. However, in Turkish legal practice, persons other than employer representatives and deputy employer representatives, would rarely hold all of such powers together.

Turkish law foresees two types of dismissals for Managers, namely ordinary termination and extraordinary termination.

Ordinary Termination

Under the employment security provisions of Turkish law, certain employees are granted specific remedies in case of an ordinary termination.

Under Turkish law, employment security provisions do not apply to Managers. Therefore, a manager may be terminated without a valid reason and remedies against such ordinary termination (such as initiating lawsuit for reinstatement (işe iade davası)) will not be available. However, the employer is still obligated to observe the notification periods for the ordinary termination of a Manager. For further details regarding such periods, please see our explanations below regarding Notice periods and Consequences if requirements are not met.

Furthermore, any Manager who has been employed by the employer in question for at least one year will be entitled to severance pay for an ordinary termination. For further details, please see our responses to Consequences if requirements are not met and Severance pay below.

In addition, where the Manager has been terminated in bad faith, he / she may claim a “bad faith compensation” (kötü niyet tazminatı). For further details, please see our explanations below regarding Consequences if requirements are not met.

Upon the ordinary termination of a Manager, the employer is obligated to grant the Manager a right to seek new employment during the notification period. Accordingly, such Manager shall have at least two hours per day to find new employment (unless the employment is terminated immediately by way of paying the Manager the amount corresponding   to his / her notification period, as indicated in our explanations below in Consequences if requirements are not met).

Lastly, upon an ordinary termination, an amount corresponding to unused leave periods will also become payable to the Manager.

Extraordinary Termination

In the presence of just reasons, Turkish law provides employers the right to dismiss a Manager immediately without having to comply with any notification periods or having to pay any severance pay.

While the law does not provide an exhaustive list, the following just reasons indicated under the law are considered as a guideline for this purpose:

  1. Health reasons;
  2. Acts of the manager breaching moral principles and the principle of good faith or similar situations;
  3. Force Majeure; and
  4. Apprehension or detention of the manager

Please see our responses below regarding Consequences if requirements are not met for further details as to the legal ramifications of an unjust termination (i.e. where the termination is absent of the alleged just reasons).

2.2 Form

A resolution is taken by the shareholders and / or board of directors, depending on the form of the company and the internal organisation of the management. The managing director must be given the opportunity to explain himself or herself and the revocation must not be made vexatiously.

The dismissal of the managing director will require the resolution of the shareholders or board of directors of the company, as applicable, which shall be recorded in a written document, such as the minutes of a shareholders’ / board of directors’ meeting, or an amendment to the articles of incorporation. In order for the dismissal to be effective before third parties, such minutes or amendment must be registered at the Companies’ Registry and, in the case of a corporation, published in local newspaper.

If the company is incorporated as a limited liability company (“limitada”), the removal of the directors is subject to the following voting thresholds, depending on (i) whether the elected director is also a shareholder or not, and (ii) whether the director was appointed in the articles of association or in a separate document, such as the minutes of a shareholders’ meeting:

  1. if the director was appointed in a separate document, whether also a shareholder or not, the removal will require the decision of a majority of the capital holders;
  2. if the director is also a shareholder appointed in the articles of association, the removal will require the approval of 2 / 3 of the capital holders, unless the articles of association provides differently; and
  3. if the director is not a shareholder, but was appointed in the articles of association, the removal will require the approval of 3 / 4 of the capital holders.

If the company is incorporated as a corporation, the managing director can be appointed either by the shareholders or by the board of directors (if any), as determined in the bylaws of the company. If managing directors and other executive officers are appointed by the board, their removal normally requires the approval of a majority of the board, unless the bylaws provide for a different threshold. If appointment is made by the shareholders, removal usually requires the approval of the holders of a majority of the company’s share capital, unless the bylaws stipulate a higher threshold.

There is no requirement for a due notice of termination of a Manager to be given in writing. However, it would be advisable to give such notice in a written form and have two witnesses present at the time of the notice for evidentiary purposes.

Further, it would also be also advisable to send an official notification (tebligat) to the Manager’s registered address of residence to ensure that the Manager is duly notified of the termination. For this purpose, specific rules under the notification procedures legislation become applicable.

In addition to the above, in most cases there will be a shareholders’ resolution and / or a board of directors’ resolution for the appointment of the Manager and this resolution will be registered with the relevant trade registry and published in the trade registry gazette. Where the Manager is terminated, a new shareholders’ resolution and / or a board of directors’ resolution will need to be made regarding the revocation of the appointment of the Manager in question and the new resolution will also need to be registered with the relevant trade registry and published in the trade registry gazette.

2.3 Notice period

No notice period, except where one is provided by the by-laws of the company or in the resolution of appointment of the managing director.

Removal as a director is immediate unless otherwise specified in the articles of association, bylaws of the company, or the shareholders’ / board of directors’ resolution

Ordinary Termination

For an ordinary termination explained above, the notice periods depend on the length of employment. Accordingly, please find below the relevant periods:

  1. For Managers whose term of employment is shorter than six months, the statutory period is two weeks;
  2. For Managers whose term of employment is between six months and one and a half years, the statutory period is four weeks;
  3. For Managers whose term of employment is between one and a half and three years, the statutory period is six weeks; and
  4. For Managers whose term of employment is longer than three years, the statutory period is eight weeks.

Please note that Turkish law, in principle, allows for the employee and   the employer to agree on an extended notification period. However, the Turkish Court of Appeals has made at least one ruling where it has stated that an employee, upon his / her termination of the employment, would only be bound to observe the periods indicated above (and not those agreed under the employment agreement). As this ruling would also be valid for Managers, if a Manager terminates his / her employment with the employer, he / she may not be required to observe a notice period longer than those indicated above.

Extraordinary Termination

For a due extraordinary termination, a notice period does not need to be observed by the employer (i.e. the dismissal will be effective immediately).

However, in an unjust termination (where the alleged just reasons for termination do not exist), compensation pertaining to the notification periods will be applicable. For further details, please see below our responses to Consequences if requirements are not met.

2.4 Involvement of works council

No involvement.

No involvement.

No involvement.

2.5 Involvement of a union

No involvement.

No involvement.

A union will be involved in the dismissal of Managers if collective employment agreements have been entered into by employees’ unions and employers (or employers’ unions) which foresee the establishment of certain bodies (composed of the representatives of labour unions and the employers) (e.g. disciplinary boards) authorized to make advisory opinions on dismissals (although such collective labour agreements would usually apply to blue-collar employees only). While such advisory opinion is not directly binding on the employer, Turkish courts may still determine that a termination that goes against such opinion is invalid.

2.6 Approval of state authorities necessary

For limited liability companies (‘SARL’), appointment of a new director is subject to government approval. For all companies, the change of director must be registered in the Monaco Companies Register.

Not necessary.

Not necessary.

2.7 Collective redundancies

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

No specific provisions are applicable to a collective redundancy concerning Managers. However, in determining whether a collective redundancy has occurred, the number of terminated Managers (if any) will also be taken into consideration.

2.8 Summary dismissals

Not applicable.

No special rules apply.

Please see above our explanation regarding extraordinary termination.

2.9 Consequences if requirements are not met

Damages may be claimed, mainly:

  • for the lack of a just cause, in the event that such reason is legally required to revoke a legal representative; or
  • if the revocation is notified under hurtful circumstances (e.g. is very sudden and unexpected, or is publicly announced before the director is informed), or if the managing director has not been granted a reasonable opportunity to make his / her point before the board’s / shareholders’ decision to revoke him / her (absence of due process). However, the managing director cannot be reinstated.

The removal of the director is void.

There are different consequences under Turkish law for an ordinary termination and an extraordinary termination which is absent of a valid or just reason. These are as follows:

Ordinary Termination

In an ordinary termination, the employer would be obligated to observe the notification periods indicated above. As such, the employer would be required to either

  1. Allow the Manager to work during the notification period (duly paying him / her for the work performed during such period); or
  2. Pay the amount corresponding to the notification period if the employer wishes to terminate the Manager immediately. Furthermore, any Manager who has been employed for at least one year will benefit from severance payment upon ordinary termination of his employment relation by the employer. For further details, please see our responses to Severance pay below.

In addition to the above, if the employment was terminated in bad faith (e.g. solely to avoid the payment of certain receivables to a Manager etc.), the employer is obligated to pay a bad faith compensation. Such compensation equals three times the amount pertaining to the notification period of the Manager.

Lastly, any amount pertaining to unused leave periods will also become payable to the Manager.

Extraordinary Termination

In this case, as the dismissal will be effective immediately, in the absence of such just cause for termination, the employer is obligated to compensate the Manager for the amount pertaining to the notification periods (as indicated above).

Furthermore, if the Manager was employed for at least one year, upon an unjust termination, he / she will benefit from severance payment upon an unjust termination of his / her employment. For further details, please see below our responses to Severance pay.

In addition, the bad faith compensation indicated above for ordinary terminations also become applicable.

Lastly, any amounts pertaining to unused leave periods become payable to the Manager.

2.10 Severance pay

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

As indicated above, in an ordinary termination, a Manager who has worked for the employer in question for at least one year is entitled to severance pay even if there was a valid reason for his / her dismissal.

As for an extraordinary termination, Managers who have worked for the employer in question for at least one year will be entitled to severance pay if they were terminated based on any grounds other than “acts breaching moral principles and principle of good faith or similar situations”.

Further, a Manager will be entitled to severance pay at any rate if he / she was terminated on an unjust basis (i.e. if the alleged just reasons for termination do not exist).

Regarding the amount of the severance payment, note that upon termination , a Manager, in principle, is entitled to 30 days of pay for each year of employment prior to termination. However, this payment is subject to a ceiling of approximately TL 7,117 (EUR 800,subject to an inflation markup bi-annually). Consequently, even if the 30 day salary of the Manager was higher than TL 7,117, the Manager may only receive this amount as severance payment for each year of employment.

For calculation of the severance pay, the gross salary will include tax and security premiums deducted from the salary as well as additional moneys and monetary rights provided to the Manager, including bonuses, child support payments, and monetary assistance in relation to health and transportation to and from work.

2.11 Non-competition clauses

Non competition clauses are only valid insofar as they specify a restricted application in time and space. They also have to include financial compensation in order to compensate the director for the loss of revenue they cause him or her. If the clause does not include those elements, it is null and void. In that case, the director may still be held liable for unfair competition towards the company if it is demonstrated that the director resorted to fraudulent practices intended to disturb the company’s activity such as denigrating it or employing key members of its staff.

If the managing director is also an employee, a non-competition clause could be agreed upon in the employment agreement. The law does not deal with the validity of non-compete clauses, and the validity of such clauses is currently being debated at the labour courts. On the one hand, some courts understand that non-compete clauses breach the constitutional right of all persons to carry out any work, profession or activity of their own choosing, provided the professional qualifications are met. On the other hand, other decisions have confirmed the validity of non-compete clauses, provided some restrictions are included, such as:

  1. the non-compete shall be reasonably limited in time and to a certain geographic area;
  2. the restriction shall be related to the activities the employee performed during his employment, and it shall be necessary and reasonable to protect a relevant interest of the employer;
  3. the employee shall be entitled to receive financial compensation if he is restricted from work due to the non-compete provision; and
  4. the non-compete clause shall be agreed on at the outset of the employment.

If the managing director is not an employee, and the non-compete  clause has been established in a corporate document (bylaws, minutes   of shareholders’ or board of directors’ meeting), courts are normally more inclined to uphold its application. However, the court would here evaluate specific aspects of the relation and assess whether, despite the director not being an employee, the non-competition clause could diminish the managing director’s employment capacity.

During the term of their employment, Managers are under a non-compete obligation as per the terms of Turkish law.

For non-compete obligations to prevail following the end of the term of employment relationship, such non-competition clauses must be limited by time and geographical scope.

From a timing perspective, Turkish law, in principle, allows for a two-year period as a valid non-compete term starting from the termination of the employment relationship. As for the geographical scope, Turkish law requires that the non-compete obligation is limited to certain regions or cities where the employment of the Manager by a competitor would be most detrimental for the initial employer. Where a non-compete obligation is found to be in excess of the said limitations, it is subject to limitation by Turkish courts. Accordingly, in a dispute, the court will not take into view the contractual non-compete obligation but will determine the scope of the non-compete obligation that could duly be agreed between the parties and proceed on that basis.

Please note that there is no specific regulation or established precedent under Turkish law regarding a non-compete in favour of a third person who is not the actual employer of the Manager in question (e.g. the parent company of the employer). As such, it is likely that a non-compete obligation in favour of such third person would be unenforceable under Turkish law.

2.12 Miscellaneous

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

It should be noted that Turkish courts are extremely employee friendly and the same approach would prevail for the Managers. Therefore, complying with the necessary principles and procedures with regard to a termination is essential. For this purpose, all the relevant documents (e.g. the employment agreement) must be reviewed very carefully and all notices and notifications (i.e. the termination notices / notifications) must be prepared in a diligent manner and duly served.