Home / Expertise / Dispute Resolution
a pair of well used, dusty muay thai boxing gloves

Dispute Resolution

Turkey

CMS has a leading and experienced dispute resolution team across emerging Europe. Lawyers across 15 offices in the region collaborate closely on advising high-profile multinational and regional clients on a wide variety of disputes from simple claims to complex, high-value litigation cases. We can represent you in civil and commercial disputes and have particular expertise in infrastructure disputes, international arbitration and white-collar crime. The dispute resolution team includes sector experts who can offer specific industry insight, for instance in insurance claims, construction litigation or disputes with regulators in the energy, telecommunications or financial services sectors.

Unlike most major law firms, you won’t find a traditional litigation department at CMS. What you will find is a team of nearly 600 experts who share a refreshing approach to disputes resolution. Our sector-focused lawyers are not just litigators and arbitration specialists, but business-minded problem solvers. We routinely act in all business areas before courts, arbitral tribunals and regulatory authorities. Whether you are faced with employee, corporate, intellectual property, competition or product liability disputes, we can support you in any European jurisdiction, obtain judicial assistance in foreign proceedings and deal with enforcement procedures for foreign judgements and arbitral awards.

Read more Read less

Feed

Show only
03 Dec 19
Tur­key passes first ju­di­cial re­form pack­age
The Turk­ish Grand Na­tion­al As­sembly ("TGNA") has passed the first pack­age of a series of leg­al re­forms as part of an over­all strategy to strengthen Tur­key's ju­di­cial sys­tem and the prin­ciple of the rule...
27 Nov 19
In­vest­ment ar­bit­ra­tion and con­struc­tion con­tracts: jur­is­dic­tion over...
A re­cent IC­SID tribunal has up­held jur­is­dic­tion over a dis­pute con­cern­ing an al­leged set­tle­ment agree­ment arising from con­tract­or claims on a ma­jor in­fra­struc­ture pro­ject in the Re­pub­lic of Mozam­bi­que....
03 Oct 19
A close look at the peri­od of man­dat­ory me­di­ation for com­mer­cial dis­putes
The Law on Pro­ced­ures to Ini­ti­ate Debt Col­lec­tion Pro­ceed­ings for Mon­et­ary Re­ceiv­ables Arising From Sub­scrip­tion Agree­ments (“Law No. 7155”) was pub­lished in the Of­fi­cial Gaz­ette dated 19 Decem­ber...
23 Sep 19
A ju­di­cial re­form strategy for Tur­key is around the corner
On 30 May 2019, Re­cep Tayyip Er­dogan, the Pres­id­ent of Re­pub­lic of Tur­key, made a pub­lic an­nounce­ment about a re­form strategy for the ju­di­cial sys­tem of Tur­key. Ac­cord­ing to the an­nounce­ment, a ju­di­cial...
21 Aug 19
Un­due para­noia over due pro­cess
Twin du­ties of fair­ness and ef­fi­ciency Most ar­bit­rat­ors are keenly aware that their award may be set aside or re­fused re­cog­ni­tion un­der the New York Con­ven­tion if the los­ing party was not ac­cor­ded due...
07 Aug 19
Singa­pore Con­ven­tion on Me­di­ation signed by 46 coun­tries at open­ing...
This art­icle is pro­duced by CMS Hol­born Asia, a Form­al Law Al­li­ance between CMS Singa­pore and Hol­born Law LLC. The United Na­tions Con­ven­tion on In­ter­na­tion­al Set­tle­ment Agree­ments Res­ult­ing from Me­di­ation,...
07 Aug 19
A step for­ward for In­ter­na­tion­al Me­di­ation: The Singa­pore Con­ven­tion...
The United Na­tions Con­ven­tion on In­ter­na­tion­al Set­tle­ment Agree­ments Res­ult­ing from Me­di­ation (known as the “Singa­pore Con­ven­tion”) is open today (7 Au­gust 2019) for sig­na­ture by United Na­tion states...
13 May 19
The Ver­dict Risk & In­vest­ig­a­tions
We are pleased to send our new is­sue of The Ver­dict, an at-a-glance round-up of re­cent leg­al de­vel­op­ments in re­la­tion to cor­por­ate crime. In this is­sue, the spot­light is on some sig­ni­fic­ant changes to...
18 Apr 19
BARE­CON - The Im­port­ance of Class
In the re­cent case of Sil­ver­burn Ship­ping (IoM) Ltd -v- Ark Ship­ping Com­pany LLC [2019] EWHC 376 (Comm), the High Court ruled that an ob­lig­a­tion in a charter­party to keep a ves­sel in class is both an...
03 Apr 19
Ger­man Fed­er­al Su­preme Court re­jects Achmea's com­plaint that its right...
At the end of Janu­ary, the Ger­man Fed­er­al Court of Justice (BGH) is­sued an­oth­er de­cision in the mat­ter of Achmea B.V. v. The Slov­ak Re­pub­lic. As already re­por­ted, in its de­cision of 31 Oc­to­ber 2018 the...
28 Feb 19
Ar­bit­rat­ing fin­an­cial dis­putes – Are there tan­gible be­ne­fits?
In the past dec­ade, sev­er­al at­tempts have been un­der­taken to pro­mote in­ter­na­tion­al ar­bit­ra­tion in the fin­an­cial in­dustry. In­deed, vari­ous fea­tures of in­ter­na­tion­al ar­bit­ra­tion ap­pear to be par­tic­u­larly...
18 Feb 19
CJEU Ad­voc­ate Gen­er­al ap­proves In­vest­ment Court Sys­tem in EU-Canada...
On 29 Janu­ary 2019, Ad­voc­ate Gen­er­al Yves Bot of the EU Court of Justice (CJEU) pub­lished his opin­ion that the in­vestor-state dis­pute set­tle­ment mech­an­ism of the EU-Canada Com­pre­hens­ive Eco­nom­ic and Trade...