Home / Publications / CMS Green Globe / Sustainability claims and greenwashing in Switzer...

Switzerland - Sustainability claims and greenwashing

What are the top 3 developments in Switzerland concerning green claims and the associated risk of greenwashing? 

Switzerland is not an island when it comes to the present disruptive and important changes to how products are manufactured, packaged and supplied. Not only are the Swiss government, public and companies concerned with sustainability issues, Switzerland also contributes, with its leading academic institutions and its innovative and strong technical sector, to environmentally friendly product manufacturing and packaging. 

ESG concerns are increasingly influencing consumer purchasing decisions and a growing number of Swiss consumers are willing to change their purchase preferences based on sustainability credentials. This trend is particularly strong amongst the younger generation. The growing presence of sustainability claims reflects this development as companies have a vested interest in informing the consumer about the sustainability credentials of their services and products. However, non-compliant advertisers face the risk of being targeted (in response to specific complaints) by market surveillance authorities, the Swiss Fairness Commission, a court, or the criminal prosecution authorities. The respective consequences include formal investigations, financial penalties, civil sanctions, and criminal prosecution, which in the worst case could lead to custodial sentences for the company directors and officers involved. 

We have identified the top 3 areas of development for those who operate or target consumers in Switzerland to be mindful of when making sustainability claims:  

1. Swiss regulation is currently based on general competition and advertising laws, while legislators monitor legal developments on sustainability claims in Switzerland and the EU 

In Switzerland, communications on sustainability, including green claims, are not regulated by a separate law or ordinance. Instead, depending on the product or service, various legal bases and regulatory requirements may be applicable. For example, the specifications for the communication of recyclability may, depending on the item to be recycled, be found in different laws and regulations. 

The Federal Act against Unfair Competition ("UCA") must always be observed in the case of advertising claims. Furthermore, the Swiss Fairness Commission, which sets standards on fairness in commercial communication, has issued a new guideline on green claims. This guideline mainly consolidates existing decisions of the Swiss Fairness Commission on green claims and takes into account international developments such as the EU Green Claims Directive. The guideline does not introduce new rules, but rather sets out the requirements for companies to make green claims in accordance with the UCA. Even though the Swiss Fairness Commission is an institution of the communication industry with the purpose of self-regulation of advertising, its principles are referred to by doctrine and practice when evaluating advertising communications. Like all other claims in business-to-business and business-to-consumer advertising, green claims must be clear, true and not deceptive. In general, a green claim can be considered to be clear, if (i) the green claim clearly states what it refers to, (ii) the communication outlines the measures that have led to the green claim (e.g. reducing emissions), (iii) the efforts advertised go beyond what is standard for the industry, and (iv) the green claim clearly states whether it refers to current circumstances or future efforts. Information provided to the customer must also be true and the company must also be able to prove the accuracy of the information, if necessary, by means of independent studies or other documentary evidence. For example, if a company makes the claim that its product has been reinvented to have a reduced carbon footprint, it must be able to substantiate this claim with independent evidence upon request. 

There is currently no pending legislation regarding sustainability claims in the Swiss parliament. This is consistent with the Swiss legislator’s preference to initially rely on existing general rules rather than issuing a specific law or regulation to tackle new issues. However, any developments in the EU are closely monitored in Switzerland. EU developments, such as the new Green Claim Directive, have not only influenced the guideline on green claims of the Swiss Fairness Commission, but are also expected to influence the interpretation of the current Swiss law. It also cannot be ruled out that once it is clearer which way the international (especially EU) regulation of sustainability claims develops and the foreign legislators have gained initial experience, Switzerland will follow suit with its own regulation. Such legislation is, though, often sector specific. 

2. Caution needed in relation to green claims when importing products from the EU into Switzerland, to reflect local sustainability infrastructure 

Producers often wish to use the same claims they use in neighbouring EU countries (i.e. Germany, Austria, France or Italy) in Switzerland, especially in the parts of Switzerland where the consumers speak the same language as neighbouring countries. 

While practice shows that the same fundamental principles for the fairness of green claims apply in the EU and Switzerland, the actual practical and commercial circumstances, (such as the availability of local waste management facilities) vary from country to country. For example, unlike EU countries, Switzerland has no comprehensive recycling system in place for plastics. This introduces the risk that claims relating to the recyclability of plastic may be untrue or misleading if they are not accompanied by a respective disclaimer. Therefore, green claims used abroad need to be reviewed for compatibility with Swiss sustainability legislation and practice. When doing so, the question of a possible translation of the claim and disclaimer into one or more of the official Swiss languages (German, French and Italian) must also be taken into account.  

3. “Corporate social responsibility” trends lead to greater focus by regulators on transparency in green claims 

Sustainability claims must also be examined against the background of local legislation on ESG. In general, it is the Swiss Federal Council’s position that corporate social responsibility and sustainability should primarily be implemented spontaneously by companies in response to specific needs. However, the trend toward increased attention to "corporate social responsibility" has long since gained a foothold in Switzerland as well. Any communication that a company is acting in a socially responsible manner has to be in line with the understanding reflected in society and local legislation on ESG. 

For example, in May 2021 Switzerland's financial-markets regulator ("FINMA") specified transparency obligations regarding climate risks. Promoting transparency in order to avoid misleading the public about a product’s sustainability characteristics (so-called “greenwashing”) are FINMA's major focus. In doing so FINMA is fulfilling its strategic goal of contributing to the sustainable development of the Swiss financial centre. 

Among recent developments in Switzerland is a new legislation providing a general reporting obligation as well as topic-specific due diligence obligations and transparency in connection with conflict minerals and child labour. The new reporting obligation is expected to affect companies for the first time in the 2023 fiscal year. Violations of these duties are punishable by fines.  

In addition, Swiss public companies and Swiss regulated companies (in particular banks and insurance undertakings) with 500 or more employees and at least CHF 20 million in total assets or more than CHF 40 million in turnover must in accordance with the new implementing ordinance on climate disclosure provide company-wide transparency on climate impact as well as a CO2 reduction target as of January 2024.  

Also, in the area of sustainable investments, the Swiss Bankers Association (SBA) has defined self-regulatory principles, which set a uniform minimum standard within the Swiss financial sector for the consideration of ESG preferences and risks in investment advice and asset management. They are in force since January 2023 and, among other things, they stipulate that advisors must include the ESG criteria in the investment discussions with their clients and that ESG topics are to be included in the training and further education of bank staff. Failing to do so will qualify as greenwashing. In addition to the SBA's principles, the Asset Management Association Switzerland (AMAS) has developed self-regulatory principles for sustainable asset management that will come into force in September 2023. They provide for the first time for binding organisational, reporting and disclosure obligations for institutions that produce and manage sustainable financial products. 

Read latest news on sustainability claims and greenwashing in Switzerland here.

Key contacts

Dr Simone Brauchbar Birkhäuser, LL.M.
Partner
Co-Head of the practice groups TMC and IP
Zurich
T +41 44 285 11 11
Dr Vaïk Müller
Partner
Head of Banking & Finance Geneva
Geneva
T +41 22 311 00 10

Subscribe to CMS Green Globe newsletter

Discover related products


02/10/2023
Expert Guide on ESG in Real Estate
In the ever-evolving landscape of real estate development, investment, and operation, a remarkable surge in ESG (environmental, social, and governance) regulatory activity is reshaping the sector. With these changes come new and vital requirements th
Comparable
27/03/2024
CMS Expert Guide to plastics and packaging laws
 Plastics and packaging have attracted  consumer, media and legislative interest over recent years with an array of laws being proposed to incentivise behavioural and design change. Significant reforms are expected globally to deal with environmental
Comparable
06/12/2023
Green Claims & Green(er) Products
21/08/2023
European Commission publishes European Sustainability Reporting Standards...
On 31 July 2023, the European Commission published the first set of the European sustainability reporting standards (ESRS). This is the first big step towards the implementation of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), which came i
16/03/2022
Greenwashing: reputations on the line
As global heating and other environmental issues have come to the forefront of public consciousness in recent years, with extreme weather events and increasingly urgent warnings about the damage humans are doing to the planet, consumers have taken a greater interest in the environmental impact of the products they buy and use. Dozens of surveys have revealed that consumers prefer en­vir­on­ment­ally-friendly products, and that they are willing to pay a premium to get them. Naturally, business have responded to this concern, with brand-owners increasingly highlighting the benign or even beneficial effects their products and services have on the natural world. However, environmental issues are highly technical, and therefore raise a significant risk of confusing and misleading consumers, who may be persuaded to part with their cash to obtain products whose environmental benefits may be less than they appear. A European Commission website screening project, which reported in January, found that green claims were exaggerated, false or deceptive in 42% of cases, and more than half the time the information provided was in­ad­equate. 2021 therefore saw an increased focus from regulators on misleading green claims. In the UK, the Competition and Markets Authority recently published a new Green Claims Code, setting out six key principles for traders to follow when making environmental claims, together with over 100 pages of examples and more detailed advice, and has implied that enforcement in this area may follow soon in 2022. The Advertising Standards Authority recently carried out a review of its regulation of green claims regulation, announcing its decisions following the first stage of its review in September. In January 2021 the Netherlands Consumer and Markets Authority published Guidelines on Sustainability Claims, and in August 2021, the French government issued its Climate and Resilience Law. Similar developments are in train across Europe. Given the level of public concern about the environment, we expect that a finding that a business has been misleading consumers about its environmental credentials has the potential to be even more damaging to its reputation than other advertising breaches. Here are some key points to remember when making green claims. 1. Be clear Environmental claims are often technical and complex. Where terms are unclear, explain what you mean by them. Use appropriate qualifications and clarifications in the ad – significant qualifications should not be on a separate web page or another location where they are likely to go unread – but remember that these must be genuine qualifications of clarifications, and may not contradict the main claim. Avoid industry jargon, or explain it when used. 2. Be specific Identify the specific environmental benefit of your product or service and state it clearly. Avoid terms like “sus­tain­able”, “green”, “en­vir­on­ment­ally friendly”, “eco-friendly” or “kind to the planet”, which are largely meaningless. Comparative claims, such as “more sustainable” or “greener”, may be acceptable if you explain the specific environmental benefit clearly. A claim made for a product or service generally should be based on a “cradle-to-grave” assessment, taking into account the environmental effects of inputs such as raw materials, water and electricity, manufacturing, transport, use and end-of-life disposal. Even with more narrowly-framed claims, make sure you consider all aspects – a common pitfall is to claim that packaging is recyclable or plastic free, without considering whether inner packaging, glue or tape, all of which form part of the packaging, meet that description. 3. Limit your claims to what you can prove Start with the evidence you have, and work out what claims you can make based on that evidence. A common pitfall is to start with the claim and then cast about for evidence to support it, which often leads to a broader claim than can be substantiated. If you have taken waste out of the supply chain, limit your claim to the supply chain. If you have reduced CO2 emissions from transport, limit your claim to transport. 4. Sub­stan­ti­ation should be thorough and detailed Because they are often technical and detailed, environmental claims may require in-depth substantiation, and you may need to expend significant time and effort compiling it. For example, claims regarding carbon neutrality or reduced carbon require a thorough survey of a business’s operation and supply chain over a significant period, first to determine its baseline carbon emissions and then to track its progress towards reduced carbon or carbon neutrality. Be aware that terms such as “bio­de­grad­able”, “organic”, “renewable”, “com­postable”, “recycled”, “re­cyc­lable”, “reusable” and “car­bon-neut­ral” have specific technical meanings, and be ready to substantiate them accordingly. Substantiation by reference to an independent test standard, such as ISO 14021 on self-declared environmental claims, tends to be more persuasive than a standard developed in-house. Take care with symbols, which have specific meanings and rules for use. Make sure evidence is up to date. Make sure claims are accurate for normal use of the products, or qualify them accordingly – for example, if a product is only biodegradable in a specialist facility, and is likely to go to landfill where it will not degrade any quicker than normal products, do not claim “bio­de­grad­able”, or at least state that specialist facilities are required. 5. Don’t claim normal product features, or things you are required to do by law, as environmental benefits For example, in the UK, rinse-off toiletry products may not contain micro beads. Claiming such products are “micro bead free” is misleading, as it implies that the products have a particular environmental advantage over other products, which they do not. 6.  Take care with comparisons Comparative advertising raises its own specific issues, and, where it refers to a competitor or its product or service by name, can substantially heighten risks by opening up the possibility of trademark infringement. Make sure you compare like with like – the comparison should be of products or services meeting the same needs or intended for the same purpose. The features compared should be material and representative, and also “veri­fi­able”, which requires the detailed basis of the comparison to be disclosed proactively, either in the advertising itself or by way of a “signpost” in the ad directing readers to the source of information.