Energy will be integral to the future of emerging Europe economies, just has it has been in the past, but the shift from traditional reliance on fossil fuels to be replaced by renewables is poised to accelerate. The move away from oil, gas and coal has been driven by a mix of political pressure, regulation and commercial drivers in the search to find clean and affordable energy.
The sector was going through a turbulent period before the war in Ukraine, as it was buffeted by a combination of demand and supply challenges and regulatory changes. Disruptions to oil and gas supplies by Russia and sanctions against Moscow sent prices soaring, but also prompted the EU and governments to increase energy security by reducing dependence on Russian imports, improving the connectivity of networks and accelerating the deployment of renewables.
Like many sectors, deal activity in the energy and utilities eased off in 2022, with deal numbers down from 91 to 69, while values rose by 55% to EUR 4.03bn. Renewables saw transactions fall from 59 to 49, but there was a surge in values, up 59% to EUR 1.77bn. For pure wind projects, there were 19 deals, down from 20, while values rose 26% to EUR 780m, and for solar projects both deal numbers and values fell. However, the value of mixed projects leapt to EUR 531m on the back of seven deals, up from two previously. Notable deals included the EUR 194m purchase of three onshore windfarms by Poland’s PGE, the EUR 190m purchase of solar and wind plants in Poland by Ingka Group of Netherlands, and the EUR 83m purchase of a Romanian solar project by Greenvolt of Portugal.
Boost or bust?
Although the rise in prices should be good news for investors in renewables, David Kohl and Marco Selenic at CMS Austria caution that this has to be balanced against rising costs. They said: “Peaking electricity prices currently lead to a welcome windfall for renewable energy producers and one would expect a boost for greenfield renewable projects. Looking deeper than the surface, however, sheds a different light on this and the current situation might even transpire to be detrimental for the move to green energy in the short run.”
They warned that several developments had the potential to put projects on hold or even threatened them with going “bust”. Rising construction costs for energy projects, which have increased significantly because of inflation, disruption to supply chains and rising equipment costs, have left project developers struggling to pass these on to contractors under turnkey development agreements. In addition, there is the risk that high energy prices could trigger government intervention such as price caps or windfall taxes on profits.
Kohl and Selenic predicted that in the long run, elevated energy prices were expected to fall back to sustainable levels, leading to “a rather uncomfortable situation” for the developers of renewable projects. They added: “As the costs in renewable energy projects are essentially front-loaded in their entirety (with subsequent operating and maintenance costs being relatively low), the developer has to bear the currently high construction costs on the one side, while on the other, revenue streams in merchant projects (the energy sold directly on wholesale markets rather than using tariffs) are expected to face downward pressures as energy prices return to long-term sustainable levels. This naturally increases project risk. Going hand-in-hand with this are rising interest rates, which increase the financing costs for renewable projects.
“All this obviously eats into renewable investors’ profits, leading to the question whether many renewable projects will be mothballed under the current economic conditions,” suggested Kohl and Selenic. Their answer was yes, some projects could be put on hold, but they were optimistic that disruption would only be temporary, saying: “In general, we see the appetite of investors and lenders for renewable projects in the region remaining high.”
They added: “Those investors who are willing to navigate the ‘subsidy jungle’ and try to find the right mix between market exposure and fixed offtake price arrangements will conclude that in the long run, renewable projects are not only good for the environment, but also good for their own portfolio.”
Perfect storm
Developments in EU regulation have been happening rapidly... to the point where some countries in the region—particularly those most reliant on fossil fuels—have voiced concerns that the EU is going too far, too fast. Weaning them off coal and gas requires a massive shift and new ways of financing and running renewable projects, such as the use of power purchase agreements (PPAs) which are becoming more common across the region. Countries that have seen an increased appetite for renewables include Poland, Romania, Hungary, Bulgaria and the Czech Republic.
Despite concerns about the rising costs of renewables in the near term, they have grown dramatically over the past decade in the drive to hit decarbonisation targets, first helped by financial stimulus packages to encourage early adoption and then by technological breakthroughs, particularly in solar, which have increased efficiency.
Another driver has been the increasingly widespread adoption of ESG measures, as investors have sought to meet their environmental and social obligations — and even some conventional oil and gas companies have joined the rush for renewables.
From an environmental perspective, one of the downsides of the current market conditions is that support for gas and coal could resurface in the push to achieve energy security, through investing in gas interconnectors or oil and gas production projects that might previously have been consigned to the back burner. Nuclear remains an alternative to coal and gas when it comes to energy supply on a massive scale, but the war has revived safety fears around the industry.
M&A in the pipeline
Blazej Zagorski of CMS Warsaw said: “We’ve seen increased activity in the energy sector in recent years, with energy transition being a key underlying factor. Developments over the last 12 months have shown also that energy cannot be treated as a typical commodity but has a strategic importance as regards reliable energy sources and networks.
“What we do currently see are regulatory changes aimed at counteracting recent developments such as rapidly increasing energy prices. In the short term, increase of regulatory burden and general instability may result in a slowdown on the market, both in terms of investments and transactions.
However, energy transition and the drive towards securing energy sources should play an important role in a further development of the market in the medium term. In turn, that should also stimulate keen activity in M&As on the market.”
OUTLOOK
Even if recent M&A activity in the energy sector has slowed in the face of problematic market conditions, Horea Popescu, Romania CMS, said he expected it to recover. “I know there is some doom and gloom around energy, but I dare to differ regarding the renewable sector. I believe it is a part of the energy industry where the fundamentals are significantly different. Firstly, the demand for additional energy sources is increasing, and secondly, there is strong commitment from the EU and individual countries to get rid of polluting industries. In Romania, half of our M&A activity involves renewable projects—and this has never happened before. We had the first wave a decade ago, but this time I believe that the economic fundamentals look much better and I can see the transactional and development activity continuing for at least the next couple of years.”
Social Media cookies collect information about you sharing information from our website via social media tools, or analytics to understand your browsing between social media tools or our Social Media campaigns and our own websites. We do this to optimise the mix of channels to provide you with our content. Details concerning the tools in use are in our Privacy Notice.