Disclaimer: This chapter was last updated on 5 November 2024 and does not reflect any subsequent developments. The information provided is intended for general informational purposes and should not be construed as legal advice.

1. How is crypto regulated?

2.What are the steps taken by the regulator to adopt MiCAR? 

It is worth noting that Gibraltar is no longer part of the EU following Brexit, and as such, MiCAR regulations do not apply here. However, Gibraltar has long had a legislative framework governing crypto-related businesses, which has been thoroughly tested and ensures compliance with overarching principles similar to those expected within the EU. From a strategic standpoint, many clients opt to establish operations in both an EU jurisdiction for EU customers (with the view of eventually applying for a MiCAR licence) and in Gibraltar to cater to clients worldwide. This dual approach offers stability and flexibility for expanding business operations effectively.

3. Are the following activities regulated or unregulated in your jurisdiction? ―Direct sales of tokens by issuers ― Exchange (buy/sell) ― Custody (hold) ― Borrowing/lending ― Yield/staking services ― Staking on proof of stake consensus mechanisms (please indicate if NFTs are treated differently from fungible cryptoassets for each activity)

4. Can offshore business provide services to local customers on either active solicitation or reverse solicitation basis?

In general, if providing services on a cross-border and reverse solicitation basis, it can be assumed that the activities are not being carried out “in or from Gibraltar” as required by section 8(1) of the FS Act. It is important to note that, although "reverse solicitation" is a concept that is recognised and accepted in Gibraltar, it is not enshrined in our legislation nor has any guidance been published on this concept or how it should be interpreted. In our experience, however, “reverse solicitation” refers to a situation where a Gibraltar customer approaches an offshore business at the Gibraltar customer’s own exclusive initiative and where at no point has the offshore business actively solicited such an outcome in Gibraltar. This includes a request or query made by the Gibraltar customer in respect of a product or services as the result of browsing websites or advertising not targeted at the Gibraltar customer, or resulting from a third-party referral from Gibraltar that is not associated to or remunerated by the offshore business. The offshore business should not have any sort of physical presence in Gibraltar, nor should it pay visits to Gibraltar to conclude deals or contracts with Gibraltar customers.

In our view, offshore businesses need to exercise care and avoid directing marketing to Gibraltar resident individuals and/or institutions. Actively marketing the services in Gibraltar or targeting Gibraltar resident individuals and/or institutions could be regarded by the GFSC as creating a sufficient nexus to Gibraltar. The result of that could be that the GFSC deems the offshore business established in Gibraltar and thus subject to the FS Act and to the DLT Regulations. The targeting of Gibraltar resident individuals and/or institutions may also create pressure on the GFSC to intervene at a general level.

5. How long would establishing a cryptoasset business/obtaining a license in your jurisdiction take?

6. What would be the approximate overall cost of obtaining a licence?

7. What is the probability (%) of success in obtaining a licence?

8. What other limitations are there in your jurisdiction when looking to set up a cryptoasset business? E.g., Compliance requirements and physical presence


The experts from Hassans provided the input.