Disclaimer: This chapter was last updated on 3 September 2026 and does not reflect any subsequent developments. The information provided is intended for general informational purposes and should not be construed as legal advice.

1. How is crypto regulated?

2. What are the steps taken by the regulator to adopt MiCAR?  

MiCAR has direct effect in Sweden. Multiple legislative steps have however been taken by the regulator to implement MiCAR. 

An act relating to the appointment of the national competent authority was passed on 22 May 2024. The SFSA was appointed as the national competent authority to handle all relevant applications for the authorisation of issuers of e-money tokens and asset-referenced tokens. The act entered into force on 30 June 2024. 

On 27 November 2024, the Swedish Parliament passed a new act with supplementary provisions to MiCAR (Sw. Lag (2024:1159) med kompletterande bestämmelser till EU:s förordning om marknader för kryptotillgångar). The new act regulates, inter alia, the SFSA’s (as the national competent authority) supervisory and investigative powers, as well as its rights to take intervening measures. The act entered into force on 30 December 2024.

As stated above, existing laws have been amended as part of the implementation of MiCAR. For example, crypto-asset service providers are now subject to direct regulation under the AML Act, and the scope of the CFO Act has been reduced to exclude administration and the trading of virtual currencies following MiCAR. These legislative changes entered into force on 30 December 2024.

The SFSA applies the EU regulatory framework and takes account of technical standards and guidelines developed by the European Supervisory Authorities, including ESMA and EBA. In relation to MiCAR, the SFSA has stated that it will comply with a number of guidelines issued by ESMA and/or EBA, including guidelines concerning the classification of crypto-assets, the provision of services by third-country firms, crypto-asset transfer services, supervisory practices for the prevention and detection of market abuse, and knowledge and competence requirements. The SFSA considers guidelines issued by the European Supervisory Authorities and addressed to competent authorities or financial market participants to be comparable to Swedish general guidelines (Sw. allmänna råd).

3. Are the following activities regulated or unregulated in your jurisdiction?—Exchange (buy/sell)—Custody (hold)—Borrowing/lending—Yield/staking services—Staking on proof of stake consensus mechanisms

4. Can offshore business provide services to local customers on either active solicitation or reverse solicitation basis? 

5. How long would establishing a cryptoasset business/obtaining a license in your jurisdiction take?

6. What would be the approximate overall cost of obtaining a licence?

7. What is the probability (%) of success in obtaining a licence?

8. What other limitations are there in your jurisdiction when looking to set up a cryptoasset business?