International rolling stock financing in Italy
- Creation of local law security over rolling stock
-
Creation of local law security over lease receivables
- Which kind of security can be granted over lease receivables?
- How is the relevant local security validly created/perfected? Are there specific requirements such as registration requirements, notarisation, notification, any other public act etc.?
- If the underlying lease agreements contain non-assignment clauses, does this have any impact on the validity and/or enforceability of the security over the receivables?
- Is a global assignment/global pledge possible, i.e. the taking of security over all present and future (lease) receivables in relation to certain specified rolling stock?
-
Creation of local law security over the shares/interests in the asset owning special purpose vehicles (SPVs)
- Which kind of security can be granted over shares/interests?
- How is the relevant local security validly created/perfected? Are there specific requirements such as registration requirements, notarisation etc.?
- Pledge over shares, represented by share certificates
- Pledge over shares held in the national clearing system in dematerialised form
- Pledge over quotas
- How will such local law security over shares/interests usually be enforced?
-
International private law/recognition of foreign law security
- Security over rolling stock
- .1 Which law is applicable for the transfer of ownership of rolling stock from the manufacturer/seller to the borrower and for the creation of security over the rolling stock (lex rei sitae, lex registri etc.)?
- .2 To what extent will validly created foreign law security over rolling stock be recognised, in particular in case of insolvency or enforcement scenarios.
- .3 In case validly created foreign law security over rolling stock will be recognised in general, does this also apply to non-possessory foreign law security which is not evidenced by any kind of public act (registration etc.)?
- Security over receivables
- .1 Which law is applicable for the creation of security over receivables?
- .2 To what extent would foreign law security over receivables be recognised, in particular in case of insolvency or enforcement scenarios?
-
Additional aspects to be considered in case of an involvement of a fleet manager
- In case a fleet manager is involved, the borrower and the manager will enter into a management agreement. Would one expect to see an outright assignment of the lease receivables from the manager to the borrower under such management agreement and would this be considered valid and enforceable?
- Are on-assignments/pledges from the borrower to the finance parties/security trustee allowed?
- What measures would usually be taken to reduce the legal impact of an insolvency of the manager?
jurisdiction
1. Creation of local law security over rolling stock
1.1 Which kind of security can be granted over rolling stock?
Under Italian Law, security over rolling stock would be granted by way of a “special privilege” (privilegio speciale) in rolling stock financings from banks to businesses. The special privilege is a security which is equivalent to a pledge but which does not require the dispossession (spossesamento) of the asset and hence the special privilege allows the assets to be freely used by the owner in the ordinary course of business. The “special privilege” security does not need to registered with any public register, however, trains are registered in the National Vehicle Registers (the “NVR” or Registro di Immatricolazione Nazionale).
1.2 How is the relevant local security validly created/perfected? Are there specific requirements such as registration requirements, notarisation etc.?
A special privilege security is validly created by way of a deed. In particular, the deed must describe the assets, the secured obligations, the secured creditors, the security grantor and the terms and conditions of the financing.
The enforceability of the privilege against third parties is subject to the registration of the deed at the competent offices (Court transcription) of the place where the company is based and financed, and of the place where the security grantor has its registered office.
2. Creation of local law security over lease receivables
2.1 Which kind of security can be granted over lease receivables?
Security over receivables can be taken by way of pledge (Pegno di Crediti) or security assignment (Cessione di Crediti a Scopo di Garanzia).
2.2 How is the relevant local security validly created/perfected? Are there specific requirements such as registration requirements, notarisation, notification, any other public act etc.?
In order to perfect the security interest, a notice of the pledge or of the assignment must be served on the debtor to be able to establish the date certain at law (data certa). This notice protects the priority of the security.
2.3 If the underlying lease agreements contain non-assignment clauses, does this have any impact on the validity and/or enforceability of the security over the receivables?
Generally, if it is not clearly specified in the underlying lease agreement, the assignment of the receivables is not prohibited.
2.4 Is a global assignment/global pledge possible, i.e. the taking of security over all present and future (lease) receivables in relation to certain specified rolling stock?
Under Italian law, it is not possible in typical financings from banks to corporate borrowers to take floating charge over business assets.
3. Creation of local law security over the shares/interests in the asset owning special purpose vehicles (SPVs)
3.1 Which kind of security can be granted over shares/interests?
Under Italian law the form of security over shares depends on the form of the shares (in paper form or held in a clearing system) and the form of participation in the equity of a company, which can be of shares (for companies incorporated as S.p.A.) or quotas (for companies incorporated as S.r.l.). In any case, security over shares/quotas can only be by way of pledge.
3.2 How is the relevant local security validly created/perfected? Are there specific requirements such as registration requirements, notarisation etc.?
A valid pledge over shares is created by specific pledge deed.
Regarding perfection of the pledge, the following applies depending on the form of the shares (in paper form or held in a clearing system) and the form of participation in the equity of a company:
Pledge over shares, represented by share certificates
The pledge over shares, represented by share certificates, has to be registered in the share certificate by a public notary and the share certificate must be delivered to the secured creditor or to an authorised custodian and registered in the shareholders’ books of the SPV.
The notary fees are calculated on a sliding scale depending on the amount of the secured obligations.
Notice to the company and annotation in the shareholders’ ledger must be obtained in order for the pledge to be valid against the company. Dividend and voting rights are for the benefit of the secured creditor but this can be excluded by the parties in the pledge agreement. Italian practice usually provides that the debtor keeps rights to dividend and voting until an event of default occurs.
Pledge over shares held in the national clearing system in dematerialised form
As for the pledge over shares held in the national clearing system in dematerialised form, the security, pursuant to Article 34 of the Legislative Decree No. 24 June 1998 (the “Euro Decree”), must be created by way of registration in a specific account held by an intermediary member of the clearing system. No registration with a public notary or registry is required.
Pledge over quotas
In relation to the pledge over quotas, the agreement creating the pledge must be filed with the Companies’ Register and notified to the company. As for the dividend and voting rights, see above with reference to the pledge over shares represented by share certificates. In general, stamp duty will apply.
3.3 How will such local law security over shares/interests usually be enforced?
General enforcement is by:
- sale to a third party via relevant Italian Civil Code public procedure, or
- assignment of the pledged shares to the lender via a competent Court.
Enforcement costs of the pledge over the shares may vary. Normally, enforcement procedure lasts from 3 to 6 months, and longer if the debtor challenges the procedure.
However, a private sale procedure can be provided by the pledge deed, as long as auction rules and sufficient transparency is guaranteed.
4. International private law/recognition of foreign law security
4.1 Security over rolling stock
4.1.1 Which law is applicable for the transfer of ownership of rolling stock from the manufacturer/seller to the borrower and for the creation of security over the rolling stock (lex rei sitae, lex registri etc.)?
According to international private law, and specifically pursuant to Article 51 of Law No. 218 of 31 May 1995 (the “Italian Private Law”), the applicable law for the transfer of ownership and the creation of security in respect of rolling stock is the law of the jurisdiction where the asset is located (i.e. lex rei sitae).
4.1.2 To what extent will validly created foreign law security over rolling stock be recognised, in particular in case of insolvency or enforcement scenarios.
In principle Italian law does not recognise foreign law security.
4.1.3 In case validly created foreign law security over rolling stock will be recognised in general, does this also apply to non-possessory foreign law security which is not evidenced by any kind of public act (registration etc.)?
In principle it is not possible under Italian law to enforce foreign law security.
4.2 Security over receivables
4.2.1 Which law is applicable for the creation of security over receivables?
According to Italian Private Law, the applicable law for the creation of security over receivables is the law of the domicile of the creditor.
4.2.2 To what extent would foreign law security over receivables be recognised, in particular in case of insolvency or enforcement scenarios?
In principle it is not possible under Italian law to enforce foreign law security.
5. Additional aspects to be considered in case of an involvement of a fleet manager
5.1 In case a fleet manager is involved, the borrower and the manager will enter into a management agreement. Would one expect to see an outright assignment of the lease receivables from the manager to the borrower under such management agreement and would this be considered valid and enforceable?
We would expect an assignment for security purposes. Under Italian law, such assignment needs to comply with the applicable principles of substantiation. In particular, if the lease agreements also relate to rolling stock of third parties, such assignment would not be enforceable due to the principle of substantiation.
5.2 Are on-assignments/pledges from the borrower to the finance parties/security trustee allowed?
Yes, it is allowed.
5.3 What measures would usually be taken to reduce the legal impact of an insolvency of the manager?
Secured creditors need to wait until the expiration of the applicable claw back period (being between 6 and 24 months depending on the type of transactions) before the security is deemed “insolvency proof”. The expiration is normally proved by the issuance of a “certain date” confirmation which is acquired by certified email or by public notary deed.