1. Has the EmpCo Directive been implemented into national law?

No.

1.1 Has a draft implementing act already been published?

No draft implementation has been issued to date, and there is likewise no publicly available indication of any legislative measures being prepared to transpose the Directive.

1.2 What is the expected timeline for transposition of the Directive?

There are no official statements or publications that would enable the expected time frame for the transposition of the directive to be determined, nor any dedicated working groups formed for that purpose, any public consultations launched on the subject, or any draft laws currently under discussion.

1.3 Are any provisions envisaged exceeding the minimum harmonisation requirements, or specific deviations? Please specify.

There is no sufficient data to predict whether the minimum harmonisation requirements will be exceeded.

2. Have official guidelines, FAQs or interpretative guidance been issued by competent authorities or consumer protection bodies regarding the application of the EmpCo Directive?

No official guidance, FAQs or interpretative guidelines have been issued by the competent authorities or consumer protection bodies regarding the application of the EmpCo Directive.

However, the Directorate-General for Consumers (Direção Geral do Consumidor) published a guide entitled ‘Environmental Claims in Commercial Communications’ in 2021. Although it is not an official interpretation by the EmpCo, it provides relevant guidelines for economic operators who make use of environmental claims.

3. Are there any national or regional EN ISO 14024 type I ecolabelling schemes that substantiate a generic environmental claim as they demonstrate “recognised excellent environmental performance”?

The main type I ecolabelling program is the EU Ecolabel (Rótulo Ecológico da UE), managed by Directorate-General for Economic Activities (“DGAE”) and the Portuguese Environment Agency (“APA”). Portuguese law already recognizes the EU Ecolabel as evidence of “recognized excellent environmental performance”. 

There is no separate national or regional ISO 14024 label beyond the EU Ecolabel. Thus, the only mechanism in Portugal that can substantiate a generic environmental claim under is the possession of the EU Ecolabel.

4. Which sanctions and enforcement mechanisms are available or envisaged (e.g. administrative fines, prohibition orders, injunctions, market bans, civil enforcement actions)?

Greenwashing is not subject to any standalone sanctioning regime. Instead, cases falling into this category are handled under the broader rules governing unfair commercial practices and misleading advertising. 
When these provisions are breached, the conduct is classified as a serious economic offence, for which the applicable fines range from €650 to €24,000, depending on the offender’s profile. 

These measures may be supplemented by other consequences, including additional penalties or injunctive orders.

5. Which authorities or institutions are competent for enforcement and supervision?

Portugal employs a diffuse enforcement regime. 

The Food and Economic Safety Authority (Autoridade de Segurança Alimentar e Económica, “ASAE”) or the relevant sector regulator have primary competence to investigate and sanction unfair commercial practices. 

The Directorate-General for Consumers (DIreção-Geral do Consumidor) is specifically responsible for overseeing commercial advertising in Portugal. 

6. Is there already specific case law on environmental claims and/or sustainability labels? 

To date, no reported Portuguese court cases have specifically dealt with greenwashing, generic eco-claims or sustainability labels. All known enforcement has been administrative.