Open navigation
Search
Languages
  • English
  • Spanish

Dan Tench is a litigator with expertise in judicial review, media law (including data protection, privacy and defamation) and sports law, undertaking many leading cases in all these areas.  He has a particular focus on artificial intelligence and quantum technology.

Dan has advised bringing and defending major judicial reviews and other administrative law challenges and on competition litigation cases. Many of his public law matters have involved issues of significant political controversy and he has exceptional experience in aligning an approach to litigation with broader political and media concerns. 

Dan also has extensive experience in advising claimants and defendants in defamation, privacy and other media litigation matters including general reputation management matters, securing injunctions and judgments in leading edge internet cases as well as bringing and defending claims for and against all types of traditional media. He has been involved in responding to many significant data security breach situations with a targeted strategy to minimise the damage, potential liability and disruption caused to the client.  He acted for the claimants in the leading data protection case of Vidal-Hall & Ors v Google.

Dan has helped prepare many individuals for appearances before Parliamentary Select Committees. He has also advised in respect of engagement with the passage of legislation before Parliament and drafted amendments to legislation which have become law.  In addition, he has prepared submissions to the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments in Parliament to prevent the passage of proposed secondary legislation (which were successful).

Dan is actively involved in both artificial intelligence and quantum technology, leading the firm’s “AI Watch” initiative and the firm’s Quantum Technology Task Force.

Dan has regularly written for and appeared on the national media including The Guardian, The Times, BBC and Channel 4 News.  He has been top ranked for media law in the legal directories for over a decade and has been in The Lawyer's Hot 100 and the Times’ “Lawyer of the Week”.

Awards & Recognitions
01
  • Quote
    "Dan is a superstar. He is an extremely good draftsman in terms of legislative drafting and amendments. He expresses himself with clarity which is very helpful."
    Chambers UK, 2025
  • Quote
    "I am very impressed by Dan."
    Chambers UK, 2025
  • Quote
    "Dan Tench is strong on public law in the context of media."
    Chambers UK, 2025
  • Quote
    "Dan Tench has a good balance of all the required skills. He is pragmatic and well-reasoned."
    Chambers UK, 2025
  • Quote
    "Dan is deeply knowledgeable, provides innovative advice and is very thoughtful."
    Chambers UK, 2025
  • Quote
    "Dan Tench is a superstar. He is extremely versatile. It's rare to touch on any area of law where he doesn't have in-depth knowledge. A real, valuable player. Dan's most eminent virtue is his extraordinary ability to produce the highest quality work at speed - in particular, he is the one lawyer I would rely on above all to be able to give me swift, full and decisive advice. Even fifteen minutes of his time can make all the difference."
    Legal 500, 2025
  • Quote
    "Dan Tench is highly proficient across all areas."
    Legal 500, 2025
  • Quote
    "Dan Tench is a standout partner. He spans expertise in defamation, competition, and public law. He has an incisive mind, and an effective client-focused approach to legal strategy."
    Legal 500, 2025

Relevant experience

Landmark cases 

  • News International in respect of a variety of matters concerning allegations of voicemail interception including preparing for and accompanying Rupert and James Murdoch before the Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee in July 2011 and acting for News Group Newspapers on numerous claims for voicemail interception brought against the News of the World.
  • Sports Information Services defending a claim brought by The Racing Partnership regarding the rights in sports data emanating from racecourses.  This is the leading case in sports rights and an important case as regards the tort of unlawful means conspiracy and confidentiality.
  • The Claimants in the leading data protection case of Vidal-Hall & Ors v Google.
  • Ingenious Media at first instance, in the Court of Appeal and in the Supreme Court in its successful judicial review of HMRC in relation to the decision of its Permanent Secretary to make disparaging disclosures regarding the Chief Executive of Ingenious Media to journalists, an important case on the law of confidentiality in the public sector and the extent of the legitimate exercise of powers by HMRC.

Public law

  • The Claimants in the judicial review of the UK Government’s proposals to apply betting and gaming duty to offshore gambling operators. The case resulted in a reference to the European Court of the European Union on issues which will determine the validity of the taxation legislation.
  • The BPI as an Interest Party successfully defending a challenge by way of judicial review brought on behalf of US artists in respect of change to copyright law as regards the provision of equitable remuneration, a leading case on the application of international law in domestic courts.
  • The Post Office in respect of its programme for selecting and closing sub post offices as part of its Network Change Programme, providing public law advice in respect of the Programme and defending on behalf of the Post Office six separate challenges by way of judicial review, all of which were defeated.

Sports / betting law

  • Tottenham Hotspur Football Club on its successful judicial review brought in relation to the terms on which the Olympic Stadium was provided to West Ham United.
  • The British Horseracing Authority on a judicial review of the Horseracing Betting Levy Board regarding the liability of betting exchanges to pay horseracing betting levy.
  • Wimbledon Football Club on its successful review of the refusal of the Football League to grant permission to relocate to Milton Keynes, one of the most significant sports law administrative challenges.
  • GVC Services (Bulgaria) in its referral to the Court of Justice of the European Union (from a Bulgarian Court) in relation to the interpretation of withholding tax under Council Directive 2011/96/EU of 30 November 2011 on the common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States (personally undertaking the advocacy before the CJEU).

Media / data / information / software

  • Ashley Hurst in relation to regulatory proceedings brought against him by the Solicitors Regulation Authority including a successful appeal to the High Court to overturn the decision of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal over wholly incorrect allegations of improperly sending a without prejudice communication in a defamation matter.
  • English PEN, Article 19 and Index on Censorship as interested parties in the Supreme Court resisting an injunction imposed to prevent the publication of an autobiographical book.
  • Numerous clients on making and dealing with requests for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and successfully appealed a refusal to provide information under such a request before the Information Tribunal (now the First-Tier Tribunal).
  • Offshore law firm Appleby Global in relation to the cyberattack and disclosure of client information that became known as the 'Paradise Papers'.

Education

  • 1991 - Common Professional Examination, Law Society Finals (distinction); College of Law, London
  • 1988 - Natural Sciences, Social and Political Studies; Cambridge University, Gonville & Caius College, Cambridge

Insights by Dan

In Dispute: CMS thought leadership on litigation issues

In Dispute: CMS thought leadership on litigation issues

29 Jun 2026 1 min read
Applied AI

Applied AI

25 Jun 2026 2 min read
The UK social media ban for children: scope, implementation and outstanding questions

The UK social media ban for children: scope, implementation and outstanding questions

17 Jun 2026 7 min read
High Court upholds Metropolitan Police's live facial recognition policy: what this means for the public and private sector

High Court upholds Metropolitan Police's live facial recognition policy: what this means for the public and private sector

08 May 2026 3 min read
Back to top Back to top
You will now find all Law-Now content on CMS.law
Opens in new window