Home / People / Rebecca Bullingham
Portrait ofRebecca Bullingham

Rebecca Bullingham

Senior Associate

Contact
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP
2 College Square
Anchor Road
Bristol
BS1 5UE
United Kingdom
Languages English, French, Spanish

Rebecca Bullingham is a Senior Associate in our Real Estate Disputes team.  She joined the firm in November 2019 with over 16 years’ previous experience in the field of real estate disputes. 

Rebecca specialises in development issues, contractual disputes, landlord and tenant matters, rights of way, restrictive covenants, rights of light, boundary issues and adverse possession, as well as proprietary estoppel and constructive trusts claims.  She is also an expert in leasehold enfranchisement and the right of first refusal.  Her clients have included real estate investors, national housebuilders, developers, retailers and supermarkets.  Rebecca is appreciated by clients for her down to earth nature and her commercial and practical approach to problems.  

more less

Relevant experience

  • Successfully defending a claim brought against Lidl UK GmbH by Generator Developments LLP for a Pallant v. Morgan equity in relation to a £6.8m development site in Brentwood Essex, in which judgment was given in favour of Lidl following a 6-day High Court trial and then subsequently in the Court of Appeal.
  • The successful Claimant/landlord in Avocet Industrial Estates LLP v. Merol Ltd & Tudor Rose International Ltd [2011] EWHC 3422 (Ch) in relation to the determination of whether a tenant’s break notice was effective.
  • A major clothing, supermarket, fast food and off-licence chains in relation to various issues arising from their property portfolio.
  • Major residential developers in relation to real property and contractual disputes, landlord and tenant issues, leasehold enfranchisement and the right of first refusal under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987.
more less

Education

2001 – LPC, Nottingham Law School, Nottingham

2000 – Post-Graduate Diploma in Law, Nottingham Law School, Nottingham

1999 – BA (Joint Hons) French & History, University of Nottingham, Nottingham

more less

Feed

14/02/2023
Rights of Access and Possession where Tenant Insolvent
Access to premises in tenant insolvency A landlord’s right to access the tenant’s premises is governed by the terms of the lease.  Any notice requirements must be adhered to, irrespective of any insolvency process the tenant is subject toBefore seeking access landlords should consider whether they want to immediately determine the lease to avoid losing any right to forfeit  Landlords often require access to premises of an insolvent tenant for health and safety and insurance purposes. They may also want to market the premises (without immediately taking back possession) to limit any lossNotice requiring access for health and safety and insurance purposes can usually be made based on the landlord’s contractual rights Land­lords can use keys it is holding or request these to access the premises making it clear in either case that it is or will hold the keys to the tenant’s order and is treating the lease as continuingThe landlord can inform the tenant’s insolvency practitioner (IP) that it will change the locks and then hold the new keys to the tenant’s order if the IP does not respondKeys must be held and used strictly for the bases set out in the lease or under any express agreement reached with the IP Possession of premises Different types of tenant insolvency will commonly trigger a right to forfeit the lease subject to the precise terms of the leaseTo preserve a right to forfeit while the landlord considers its options, a rent stop should be imposed immediately and no action taken to treat the lease as continuing, discussions with the tenant or the IP about the leaseIf the landlord does want to pursue forfeiture, notice under section 146 Law of Property Act 1925 will need to be served unless the landlord also has an existing right to forfeit for non-payment of rent Possession - administration In administration there is a moratorium on forfeiture without (a) the ad­min­is­trat­ors’ consent; or (b) leave of the courtIf administrators do not require the property for the purposes of the administration, it is very likely that they will grant consentIf administrators refuse consent to forfeit, the landlord can apply to court for per­mis­sion­Ad­min­is­trat­ors may be prepared to accept a surrender of the lease on agreed terms; this should be discussed on a without prejudice basis if forfeiture is also being pursuedA surrender can be effected by (a) formal deed; or (b) operation of lawA surrender by operation of law can be straightforward, quick and relatively cheap, subject to dealing with any outstanding charges affecting the property which the surrender could be otherwise subject to Possession - liquidation In a compulsory liquidation, forfeiture by proceedings can only be pursued with the liquidator’s consent or permission of the courtForfeiture can be carried out by peaceable re-entry, but may be subject to challengeIn a voluntary liquidation, the landlord can forfeit by proceedings or peaceable re-entry unless a cred­it­or/li­quid­at­or/con­trib­ut­ory has applied to court for an order to restrainA liquidator can disclaim onerous contracts including a lease. Disclaimer will end the tenant company’s rights and liabilities under the lease and, if there is no other party liable, will determine the leaseThe landlord will have a claim for its loss resulting from disclaimer in the li­quid­a­tion­Land­lords can serve notice requiring a liquidator to elect within 28 days whether or not to disclaim the lease, or otherwise lose the right to do soThe rights and liabilities of any third parties, such as guarantors, former tenants and sub-tenants are unaffected by a dis­claim­er­Provid­ing a sub-tenant complies with the liabilities under the insolvent tenant’s head lease, the landlord cannot take possession, but has no direct contractual relationship with the sub-tenantThe landlord, sub-tenants and third parties with a relevant interest in the property can apply to court for a vesting orderAgreeing a surrender of the lease is also an option if the tenant is in liquidation Possession - company voluntary arrangement (“CVA”) and restructuring plans (“Plan”) Forfeiture of a lease cannot be prohibited by the terms of a CVA or a Plan  However, the terms of the CVA/Plan varying the contractual terms of the lease may mean that there are no breaches of the tenant’s covenants as variedIn consideration of the compromises imposed on landlords, the CVA/Plan will grant impaired landlords an option to recover possession of the premises by serving a notice to vacateThe terms of the lease as varied by the CVA/Plan will therefore govern how (if at all) the lease may be terminated early 
10/01/2022
Court of Appeal overturns judgment - Bath Rugby expansion to proceed
Bath Rugby Ltd were given an early Christmas gift on 21 December 2021 when the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in this case, allowing the appeal and subsequently overturning the decision made in...
07/04/2021
Commercial Rent Collection and Covid-19: Government’s call for evidence...
The temporary restrictions on landlords’ rights to take action against their commercial tenants for non-payment of rents, imposed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, are due to expire on 30 June 2021. These...