Home / People / Tom Dane
Portrait of Tom Dane

Tom Dane


CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP
Cannon Place
78 Cannon Street
United Kingdom
Languages English, Spanish

Tom is a partner and leads the Finance Disputes team in London.

Tom has over 15 years’ experience of litigating high value and complex disputes with a particular focus on banking and finance disputes. Tom is ranked as a leading individual for banking litigation in the legal directories.

In 2017, Tom was seconded to a large UK bank where he worked on a range of high profile matters including a substantial remediation scheme, follow on litigation against the bank and parallel regulatory investigations, together with more “business as usual” claims.

Tom regularly handles large scale cross-border disputes involving High Court proceedings or international arbitration. Tom also acts for international and domestic insolvency practitioners in pursuing claims on behalf of insolvent estates. Since becoming a partner in 2011, Tom has strong experience of working on contentious insolvency matters; civil fraud claims; joint venture disputes; claims regarding directors duties; and applications for interim remedies including freezing injunctions.

more less

Tom Dane is ranked as a leading individual for banking litigation and described as an “excellent litigator”

Legal 500, 2020

Tom Dane is recommended and “brutally efficient”.

Legal 500, 2017

"Strong litigator who is highly responsive and excellent with the business: a good person to have on your side in a dispute."

Chambers 2014

Relevant experience

  • UK bank in defending a £300m claim brought via Commercial Court proceedings.
  • Board of directors of an issuer of a USD 30 million Initial Coin Offering regarding a potential group action by claimant investors.
  • Turkish company and directors in relation to Commercial Court proceedings brought by eleven hedge funds alleging deceit in relation to a USD 200 million bond issue.
  • International bank in relation to an expert determination.
  • Liquidators of a UK company in relation to multi-million pound claims against former directors.
  • Investment bank in relation to a Stockholm Chamber of Commerce arbitration.
  • Russian clients in relation to a dispute arising from the multi-million dollar financing of a diamond business (Commercial Court trial and LCIA arbitration).
  • High net worth individual in relation to a dispute regarding multi-million dollar loan agreements and a family trust involving parallel proceedings in England, BVI, St Kitts & Nevis and St Vincent & Grenadines.
  • UK based wealth management company in defending various claims advanced by high net worth clients.
  • Public limited company in relation to an investigation by the Insolvency Service.
  • Various banks on disputes arising from commercial and retail banking operations such as remediation programmes, breach of mandate claims, and defending claims involving allegations of mis-selling and fraud.  Tom has been seconded full time as a partner to a major UK bank and so has good knowledge of the inner workings of financial institutions.
  • Financial institution in relation to its claim for over EUR 14 million against a German listed entity relating to commission due for introducing a significant hedge fund investor.
  • US Government Agency in relation to securing over USD 100 million of assets held in London financial institutions as a result of alleged cyber hacking perpetrated by European defendants in support of ongoing US legal proceedings.
  • The Swiss liquidators of the Petroplus Group on numerous English law issues arising out of a USD 2 billion facility agreement and the cross-border insolvency of the group, including pursuing claims before the English High Court.
  • Italian bank in relation to its claim against another bank for mis-selling a EUR 50 million structured note which included exposure to the first loss tranche of a synthetic CDO.
more less


  • 2000 – LPC, Nottingham Law School (Distinction)
  • 1999 – LLB, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
more less


Bank­ing Dis­putes we­bin­ar - Data driv­en ana­lys­is and trends
Join our Fin­ance Dis­putes team on Wed­nes­day 5 Oc­to­ber as they provide an over­view of their find­ings and sum­mar­ise the key parts of their re­cently pub­lished “Bank­ing Dis­putes Re­port 2022”.    The...
Se­cur­it­ies lit­ig­a­tion – cometh the hour!
We now have the long-awaited de­cision of Mr Justice Hild­y­ard in Autonomy & ors v Mi­chael Richard Lynch & anr [2022] EWHC 1178 (Ch).  The judg­ment is long and deals with a mul­ti­tude of is­sues.  This...
Se­cur­it­ies lit­ig­a­tion - mean­ing of "per­sons dis­char­ging ma­na­geri­al re­spons­ib­il­ity"...
In­tro­duc­tion In a re­cent de­cision the Eng­lish High Court has cla­ri­fied the mean­ing of “per­sons dis­char­ging ma­na­geri­al re­spons­ib­il­ity” for the pur­poses of es­tab­lish­ing li­ab­il­ity un­der s.90A/Sch 10A...
Court of Ap­peal de­cides that, in prin­ciple, banks can be li­able to an in­di­vidu­al...
In a judg­ment handed down on 14 March 2022 (Phil­ipp judg­ment), the Court of Ap­peal has de­cided that it is at least pos­sible in prin­ciple that a rel­ev­ant duty of care could arise in the case of a cus­tom­er...
Com­pet­i­tion & Mar­kets Au­thor­ity loses con­sumer re­dress test case
CMS has suc­cess­fully de­fen­ded care home pro­vider, Care UK, in an im­port­ant con­sumer re­dress test case pur­sued by the Com­pet­i­tion & Mar­kets Au­thor­ity (CMA). The High Court judg­ment has wide im­plic­a­tions...
LIBOR lit­ig­a­tion: High Court con­firms that a claimant must be “aware” of...
In the latest case in­volving a claim for mis­rep­res­ent­a­tion arising from the LIBOR scan­dal, the High Court has set a high bar for a suc­cess­ful mis­rep­res­ent­a­tion claim, in what is a help­ful de­cision for...
Fin­ance Dis­putes: latest de­vel­op­ments and up­com­ing is­sues
Our Fin­ance Dis­putes pan­el­lists will look at three key risk areas in re­la­tion to the world of fin­ance. This ses­sion is suit­able for all at­tendees wheth­er you work in the fin­an­cial ser­vices sec­tor or not:Cryptoassets:...
The Fin­CEN Files: the latest fin­an­cial scan­dal or storm in a tea­cup?
What are the Fin­CEN files? The Fin­an­cial Crimes En­force­ment Net­work (“Fin­CEN”) is a branch of the US treas­ury that aims to com­bat fin­an­cial crime. The ‘Fin­CEN files’ refers to an ap­par­ent leak...
Ar­bit­ra­tion agree­ment = no wind­ing up pe­ti­tion?
In Tel­nic Ltd v Knipp Medi­en und Kom­munika­tion GmbH [2020] EWHC 2075 (Ch), Sir Geof­frey Vos sit­ting in the Eng­lish High Court ruled that where a debt is gov­erned by an ar­bit­ra­tion agree­ment, it is ap­pro­pri­ate...
En­force­ment of fin­ance trans­ac­tions – slice and dice ap­proach to il­leg­al­ity 
Il­leg­al­ity com­mit­ted by some note­hold­ers does not pre­vent re­cov­ery on be­half of in­no­cent note­hold­ers un­der an Eng­lish law note in­stru­ment. In Madis­on Pa­cific Trust Lim­ited v (1) Shakoor Cap­it­al Com­pany...
Se­cur­it­ies lit­ig­a­tion: Share­hold­er claims post Cov­id-19
In­tro­duc­tion Pri­or to the Cov­id-19 crisis the UK was already see­ing an up­tick in claims brought by share­hold­ers against com­pan­ies and dir­ect­ors. In par­tic­u­lar, there have been a num­ber of high pro­file...
Good faith and ra­tion­al­ity – be­com­ing a trend?
In­tro­duc­tion As we look to emerge from the Cov­id-19 pan­dem­ic and deal with the res­ult­ant eco­nom­ic en­vir­on­ment, parties’ be­ha­viour vis-à-vis their coun­ter­parties is go­ing to come un­der sharp­er fo­cus...