Home / People / Emma Schaafsma
Portrait ofEmma Schaafsma

Emma Schaafsma

Partner

Contact
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP
Cannon Place
78 Cannon Street
London
EC4N 6AF
United Kingdom
Languages English, Dutch

Emma Schaafsma (Kratochvilova) is a partner in the Disputes Resolution team in London. 

Emma has over 20 years’ experience representing clients in high-value and complex disputes arising on international construction projects in the energy and infrastructure sectors.  Projects include power and process plants, LNG tank and terminal, wind (onshore and offshore), road and rail; in South East Asia, China, the Middle East, the United States, Mexico, South America and New Zealand.  

Emma’s experience includes supporting clients on claims arising during project execution, Dispute Board referrals, expert determination, mediation and arbitration (ad hoc and under various institutional rules).   During her career she spent 13 years in Japan, including two years in-house at an international heavy industries contractor. She has been recognised as a leading lawyer in the directories since 2013.  

more less

Relevant experience

  • A contractor in relation to a $bns JCAA arbitration concerning two EPC power plant projects in Africa.
  • An international boiler supplier in US litigation defending and (following mediation) successfully settling claims following catastrophic overheating of the super-critical boiler during the start-up phase of the construction of a power plant project in Texas, USA.
  • A contractor in ICC arbitration in London concerning delay, defects and loss and expense claims on a power and desalination EPC project in North Africa.
  • A heavy industries contractor in ICC arbitration in Tokyo defending claims brought by a subcontractor on an Asian high speed rail project.
  • A civil engineering contractor in relation to ICC arbitration and parallel litigation concerning delays, variation claims and a tunnel collapse on a major highway infrastructure project.
  • An international energy corporation against an Asian EPC contractor in LCIA arbitration concerning claims arising during the warranty period on a coal fired power plant project in South America.
  • A Saudi Arabian subsidiary of a large Asian oil and gas company in an ICC construction arbitration in Singapore on its claims for EOT and delay related costs arising on a petrochemicals project in Saudi Arabia.
  • A Japanese trading company as respondents in ICC arbitration, Geneva, regarding an international highway construction project.
  • A Japanese trading company in JCAA arbitration in Tokyo for the recovery of sums due under multiple contracts for the supply of construction equipment in Saudi Arabia.
  • An English biotech company in ad hoc arbitration in London against a contractor in relation to claims arising under a design-build contract for the construction of facilities in England.
more less

Memberships & Roles

  • TeCSA 
  • SCL UK 
  • IPBA
more less

Education

  • CPE & LPC College of Law, Guildford
  • BA Hons., Durham
more less

Feed

01/11/2023
Delay claims under the FIDIC form: Obrascon challenged
A recent decision of the Court of Appeal of the Dubai International Financial Centre has adopted a stricter interpretation of the requirements for notifying delay claims under the FIDIC form, disagreeing...
22/03/2023
Settling Disputes: striking the deal… and executing it
Some of the most difficult issues in disputes come at the end of the process, both during settlement negotiations and after a deal has been struck. In this session, our speakers, David Bridge and Emma...
19/10/2022
CMS Risk Essentials Webinar
Navigating contract termination and beyond: a review of recent case law and practical guidance Ensuring a smooth termination of contractual relationships is a common concern for commercial businesses...
08/09/2022
APAC Region: Managing Risk in a Volatile Market
Legal Issues to Consider and Manage in 2022/2023 2022 was a challenging year for many businesses, including for those in the energy sector. 2023 looks to be just as demanding. Slow global growth, the war in Ukraine, continuing supply chain challenges as well as the after-effects of the COVID-19 pandemic are some of the factors causing disruption to business. Here, we highlight some of the legal issues that a party doing business in the energy sector in a volatile market could expect to encounter, and how the risks may be managed. Supply chain risk Current supply chain shortages and restrictions, exacerbated by labour and materials cost inflation which continue from the Covid-19 pandemic. Manage risks by:Actively reviewing robustness of supply chain in a crisis (at all tiers). Ef­fect­ive force majeure drafting and planning. Ensuring there is sufficient security for delivery obligations and carrying out regular credit checks on suppliers.  Termination risk Volatile markets tend to result in additional termination risks:Manage risks by:Review portfolio of key contracts for contracts at risk. Actively engage with counterparties to mitigate risk of termination for essential contracts. Utilise termination rights to escape onerous contracts. Counterparty risk Increased counterparty insolvency risk caused by market volatility. Manage risks by:Conducting effective due diligence. Carrying out detailed assessments on cred­it­wor­thi­ness. Ensuring financial security in the event of insolvency (on-demand bonds, letters of credit etc.). Government intervention The increasing export or import-related restrictions imposed by Governments. Manage risks by:Considering fulfilment of contractual obligations. Reviewing contractual rights and ability to use alternative sources of supply. Careful consideration of trade portfolio. EPC ‘Hot market’ A perfect storm of under supply, over demand, inflation pressures, and legacy of the Covid-19 pandemic for the engineering procurement and construction market will require effective management of:Proper assessment of ability to deliver at tender stage. Contractual damages and incentives for ‘on time’ delivery. Managing project change. Sanctions Sweeping financial global sanctions as a result of Russia’s War on Ukraine may impact your business. Manage risks by:Reviewing nexuses to Russia. Identifying sanctions which apply. Managing any business from a reputational and ESG-based perspective, and consider alternative options. Price volatility LNG spot price is at an all-time high, with potential volatility in all commodity markets. Manage risks by:Careful consideration of counter-party non-delivery, force ma­jeure/ter­min­a­tion. Preparing for circumstances of an inability to deliver / accept delivery and whether any force majeure clause excuses performance. Check price review / reopener clauses in long-term agreements. Careful consideration of any impact on cost base and margin calls. ESG transformation The drive towards net zero and ESG expectations. Manage risks by:Reviewing contractual arrangements for carbon neutral trading and contracting. Considering whether counter-party net zero and / or ESG commitments have adequate remedies in the event of breach. Managing regulatory changes and company policies.
01/08/2022
ESG in Construction - a view from the market
In June 2022, CMS hosted a Roundtable event on “The impact of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) considerations on the construction industry” with senior representatives from stakeholders in UK and overseas construction projects.  The discussion centred on how rapid developments in the ESG space are impacting corporations and the projects they are engaged on.  
22/02/2022
New FIDIC Green Book Released: a rival to the First Edition Red and Yellow...
FIDIC has recently published the second edition of its Short Form of Contract, the “Green Book”, as an update to the 1999 edition. This release is important not only in terms of the revised or new...
11/11/2021
ESG: Ten steps to success for construction companies
Construction is one of the sectors most exposed to ESG considerations. Decarbonisation is a particular concern, as commonly used construction materials account for a significant percentage of carbon emissions. In 2020, the United Nations Environment Programme calculated that the building sector was responsible for 38% of global energy-related CO2 emissions – and that annual progress in decarbonisation had halved between 2016 and 2019. Successful decarbonisation will require major changes in the sector, with much greater levels of both investment and innovation. We highlight ten top-level steps for construction companies that want to maximise their ESG performance and benefits.
21/07/2021
Post-termination liquidated damages: orthodoxy restored 
In a much-anticipated decision last week, the Supreme Court has overturned a Court of Appeal ruling on the application of liquidated damages for delay in termination scenarios. While ultimately the question...