Home / People / Sarah Grenfell
Picture of Sarah Grenfell

Sarah Grenfell

Partner

CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP
Cannon Place
78 Cannon Street
London
EC4N 6AF
United Kingdom
Languages English

Sarah Grenfell is a solicitor-advocate and Partner in our Infrastructure, Construction and Energy (ICE) Disputes Group.

Specialising in high-value disputes, Sarah regularly advises clients on all forms of dispute resolution, including international arbitration (ad hoc and institutional) and High Court litigation.

Sarah is a member of, among others, the IBA, LCIA, ICC (Sarah is a member of the ICC Task Force on Emergency Arbitrator Proceedings) and Society of Construction Law.

more less

Relevant experience

  • A global engineering company in relation to disputes over the alleged failures of gas turbines in a major Middle East power plant.
  • An SPV in PPP hospital project in its operational phase, including in relation to issues concerning defects in the firestopping.
  • A respondent state in a pending contentious case before the International Court of Justice.
  • A global energy company in relation to claims made under a joint bidding agreement relating to an oil field in the MENA region.
  • An operator in the Middle East in relation to an LCIA arbitration and claims of approximately US450 million arising from a construction contract relating to an oilfield development project.
  • A large Russian energy company in an LCIA arbitration in relation to a dispute over the consequences of the termination of a SPA.
  • Force majeure claims for a ‘Big Six’ energy supplier in the Commercial Court, to avoid significant payments under a take or pay contract.
  • A claim for an offshore excavation company seeking damages for premature contract termination and defending a significant counterclaim relating to the capabilities and quality of the equipment, achieving a beneficial settlement through mediation.
  • A main contractor on multi-billion dollar disputes and possible arbitration proceedings in relation to civil works in Dubai.
  • A UAE financial institution in US$100 million arbitration proceedings (ICC) arising from breach of contract and bad faith.
  • A main contractor in relation to US$20 million delay and disruption claims brought by a sub-contractor.
  • A US$300 million professional negligence and fraud claim arising from the sale and purchase of a chain of retail electronic stores in the UAE.
  • Multiplex Constructions (UK) in the case of Multiplex Constructions v Cleveland Bridge, relating to a dispute arising from the construction of the National Stadium at Wembley.
more less

Education

  • 2004 - LLM, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
  • 2003 - Admitted as a Solicitor in Australia
  • 2002 - LLB, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
more less

Feed

Show only
CMS Guide to Con­sequen­tial Loss Clauses in the En­ergy...
27 Nov 19
In­vest­ment ar­bit­ra­tion and con­struc­tion con­tracts: jur­is­dic­tion over...
A re­cent IC­SID tribunal has up­held jur­is­dic­tion over a dis­pute con­cern­ing an al­leged set­tle­ment agree­ment arising from con­tract­or claims on a ma­jor in­fra­struc­ture pro­ject in the Re­pub­lic of Mozam­bi­que....
17 February 2020
“Each prob­lem that I solved be­came a rule, which served...
11 Oct 19
Quantum meruit claims after ter­min­a­tion: a chan­ging of the tide?
A de­cision of the Hight Court of Aus­tralia earli­er this week has held that resti­tu­tion­ary claims on a quantum meruit (i.e. reas­on­able price) basis by con­tract­ors after the ter­min­a­tion of a con­struc­tion...
01 Nov 16
In­to the un­known: European M&A Out­look 2016
A study of European M&A activ­ity
30 Jul 19
Oil & Gas: Bunker Sup­ply Con­tracts Re­vis­ited
In Cock­ett Mar­ine Oil DM­CC v Ing Bank NV & An­or [2019] EWHC 1533 (Comm) the Com­mer­cial Court dealt with the latest round of the OW Bunker saga. (See, for ex­ample, our Law-Now from 2016 on PST En­ergy 7...
14 Feb 19
EU Mem­ber States ad­opt de­clar­a­tion on the ter­min­a­tion of all bi­lat­er­al...
On 15 Janu­ary 2019, rep­res­ent­at­ives of EU Mem­ber States made the first form­al step to­wards end­ing bi­lat­er­al in­vest­ment pro­tec­tion treat­ies signed between EU Mem­ber States (“in­tra-EU BITs”) when they...
19 Jul 18
Tax in­dem­nit­ies in in­ter­na­tion­al M&A: when does tax be­come pay­able?
In Min­era Las Bam­bas SA & An­or v Glen­core Queens­land Ltd & Ors [2018] EWHC 1658 (Comm), the Com­mer­cial Court de­cided that VAT was not “pay­able” for the pur­poses of a tax in­dem­nity in a share pur­chase...
09 Mar 18
CJEU rules against ar­bit­ra­tion clauses in In­tra-EU Bi­lat­er­al In­vest­ment...
On 6 March 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Uni­on (CJEU) ruled that Art­icles 267 and 344 of the Treaty on the Func­tion­ing of the European Uni­on (TFEU) must be in­ter­preted as pre­clud­ing ar­bit­ra­tion...
24 Feb 17
Ham­burg Rules on jur­is­dic­tion not a block to an anti-suit in­junc­tion
In Aline Tramp SA v Jordan In­ter­na­tion­al In­sur­ance Com­pany (CL-2016-000263) and The Lon­don Steam-Ship Own­ers’ Mu­tu­al In­sur­ance As­so­ci­ation Lim­ited v Jordan In­ter­na­tion­al In­sur­ance Com­pany (CL-2016-000264),...
24 Feb 17
Scope of third party dis­clos­ure cla­ri­fied
In a re­cent ap­plic­a­tion, a party sought an or­der for dis­clos­ure of cer­tain doc­u­ments from a third party. The Court has dis­cre­tion to or­der third party dis­clos­ure only where (a) the doc­u­ments sought are...
30 Jan 17
It takes two to ar­bit­rate: but in what cir­cum­stances will a Court...
In Sil­ver Dry Bulk Com­pany Ltd v Homer Hul­bert Mari­time Com­pany Ltd [2017] EWHC 44 (Comm), the Com­mer­cial Court has af­firmed that whilst it “takes two to ar­bit­rate, just as it does to tango”, the...