AIFMD II Implementation across jurisdictions
Key contacts
Introduction
Directive (EU) 2024/927 (commonly referred to as “AIFMD II”) introduces significant new requirements for alternative investment funds managers across the European Union. It significantly enhances the existing regime by strengthening liquidity management, introducing a harmonised framework for loan-originating AIFs, and clarifying delegation and risk management requirements, thereby enhancing investor protection and promoting financial stability.
While AIFMD II provides a common standard, Member States retain discretion in certain areas. This discretion means that, in practice, the application of the directive may differ across jurisdictions, making it important to review the local transposition. Key areas where positions are clarified include:
- National deviations – any provisions that deviate from, supplement, or provide additional clarification beyond the AIFMD II text.
- Depository rules – whether cross-border depositary options are exercised, and any specific local requirements for depositary arrangements.
- Loan origination regime – whether there are jurisdiction-specific rules or restrictions, including in relation to consumer lending, and whether authorities intend to introduce additional prudential or supervisory requirements.
- Regulatory guidance – guidance, circulars, Q&A, or supervisory expectations issued by the national regulator relating to AIFMD II compliance.
Examining these areas allows market participants to anticipate jurisdiction-specific obligations, structure AIFs in a compliant manner, and understand how harmonised EU requirements interact with local rules.
Summary table
| Country | Status of Implementation | National Deviations | Depositary Rules | Loan Origination Regime | Regulatory Guidance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austria | Draft published 22 Jan 2026; expected entry into force 16 Apr 2026 (parliamentary process) | Faithful transposition with clarifications: linguistic corrections, consumer lending prohibition, terminological alignment, removal of obsolete requirements, UCITS-related clarifications | Austrian AIFs cannot appoint foreign depositary; cross-border structures recognised if home Member State exercises option | Follows AIFMD II; consumer lending prohibited under §13(4g) AIFMG | FMA publication Reden wir über Aufsicht (Dec 2025) on liquidity management tools; no broader guidance |
| France | No formal legislation yet; expected by 16 Apr 2026 | Largely faithful transposition; minor adjustments expected for management company scope, supervisory frameworks, regulatory concept interaction | Not yet specified | Expected to clarify framework for French and foreign AIFs; position on consumer lending pending | AMF has not issued detailed guidance; existing doctrine anticipates liquidity management tools |
| Germany | Draft law published; first Bundestag reading 15 Jan 2026; expected entry 16 Apr 2026 | “1:1” implementation; no material deviations identified | Not yet specified | Existing prohibition on consumer lending maintained; facilitation for loan origination via SPVs expected | No guidance issued by BaFin |
| Hungary | Transposed via Act C of 2025 (16 Dec 2025); staged entry 2026–2029 | Ancillary services extended; substance requirements; crypto-asset services authorised | No cross-border appointment; depositaries must be in Hungary | Consumer lending prohibited; otherwise follows AIFMD II | No guidance issued by MNB |
| Italy | Draft legislative decree submitted 16 Dec 2025; adoption expected before 16 Apr 2026 | Structured national specifications: loan-originating AIFs, conflicts of interest, leverage limits, liquidity management, supervisory powers | Not yet specified | Prescriptive approach combining AIFMD II with national rules; consumer lending restrictions apply | Detailed regulatory measures expected post-adoption; no formal guidance yet |
| Luxembourg | Transposed via Bill of Law n°8628; entry 16 Apr 2026; reporting from 2027 | Ancillary services expanded; interpretation of “third party” clarified; liquidity management tools broadened; auditor exemption added | No cross-border appointment; a Luxembourg depositary may act for a non-domestic AIF where the AIF’s home Member State permits it | Consumer lending prohibited for Luxembourg and foreign AIFs targeting Luxembourg consumers; otherwise follows AIFMD II | The CSSF has not issued detailed guidance at this stage; only a preliminary communication on liquidity management tools |
| Mauritius | No implementation since Mauritius is not a member of the European Union and, as such, is not required to implement AIFMD II into its domestic legal framework. | The regulation of AIFs remains fully governed by domestic legislation. The regulation of AIFs remains fully governed by domestic legislation. | The regulation of AIFs remains fully governed by domestic legislation. | The regulation of AIFs remains fully governed by domestic legislation. | No guidance, rules or regulations has been issued. |
| Netherlands | Implementatiewet adopted 17 Mar 2026; entry 16 Apr 2026; reporting from 2027 | Minimal deviations: ancillary services extended, substance clarified, supervisory coordination formalised | Cross-border appointments permitted subject to AFM approval | Follows AIFMD II in detail, including leverage, concentration limits, risk retention; consumer lending allowed | AFM guidance issued on governance, liquidity management tools, loan origination |
| Norway | Consultation closed 9 Jan 2026; final proposal pending; likely delayed vs EU timeline | Gold-plating: retail investor authorisation, qualified non-professional investor regime | No cross-border appointment | Consumer lending prohibited; AIFs limited to originating loans, not acquiring portfolios | No guidance issued |
| Sweden | Preparatory report (SOU 2025:60) published; entry expected Apr 2026, phased | Avoids gold-plating; substance assessment by Finansinspektionen; supervisory discretion | Not yet specified | Follows AIFMD II; risk retention 5%; consumer lending governed separately | No guidance issued |
| Switzerland | Not implementing AIFMD II; monitoring developments as third country | Not applicable; indirect AIFMD II implications: delegation, risk management, reporting | Not applicable | No similar regime (local framework more flexible); EU rules apply indirectly via NPPRs | No guidance issued by FINMA |
AIFMD II Issue video gallery
Slide title
AIFMD II Implementation in Austria
AIFMD II Implementation in Belgium
AIFMD II Implementation in France
AIFMD II Implementation in Germany
AIFMD II Implementation in Hungary
AIFMD II Implementation in Italy
AIFMD II Implementation in Luxembourg
AIFMD II Implementation in Mauritius
AIFMD II Implementation in The Netherlands
AIFMD II Implementation in Norway
AIFMD II Implementation in Portugal
AIFMD II Implementation in Spain
AIFMD II Implementation in Sweden
AIFMD II Implementation in Switzerland
AIFMD II Implementation in United Kingdom
jurisdiction
Select a jurisdiction
Select up to two additional jurisdictions to compare with (optional)
Select up to two additional jurisdictions to compare with (optional)