Implementation tracker for the EmpCo Directive - Austria
Authors
- Has the EmpCo Directive been implemented into national law?
- Have official guidelines, FAQs or interpretative guidance been issued by competent authorities or consumer protection bodies regarding the application of the EmpCo Directive?
- Are there any national or regional EN ISO 14024 type I ecolabelling schemes that substantiate a generic environmental claim as they demonstrate “recognised excellent environmental performance”?
- Which sanctions and enforcement mechanisms are available or envisaged (e.g. administrative fines, prohibition orders, injunctions, market bans, civil enforcement actions)?
- Which authorities or institutions are competent for enforcement and supervision?
- Is there already specific case law on environmental claims and/or sustainability labels?
jurisdiction
1. Has the EmpCo Directive been implemented into national law?
No.
1.1 Has a draft implementing act already been published?
Yes.
1.2 What is the expected timeline for transposition of the Directive?
The draft amendment to the national Unfair Competition Act (UWG) implementing the EU’s EmpCo Directive has recently been published and stakeholders have been set a short timeline until 19 June to submit comments. The draft is expected to enter into force on September 27, 2026.
1.3 Are any provisions envisaged exceeding the minimum harmonisation requirements, or specific deviations? Please specify.
The national draft is almost identical to the text of the EmpCo Directive. However, the national draft includes a transitional provision that the EmpCo Directive does not include: It stipulates that for a period of three years any civil claims relating to the new provisions concerning goods may only be asserted if the goods in question were placed on the market after September 27, 2026.
2. Have official guidelines, FAQs or interpretative guidance been issued by competent authorities or consumer protection bodies regarding the application of the EmpCo Directive?
Yes, longer interpretative guidance has been published alongside the draft, including guidance on the definition of terms and impact goals of the draft.
3. Are there any national or regional EN ISO 14024 type I ecolabelling schemes that substantiate a generic environmental claim as they demonstrate “recognised excellent environmental performance”?
Yes. In Austria there is the “Austrian Ecolabel”, which indicates special environmental quality of products, services, and institutions.
4. Which sanctions and enforcement mechanisms are available or envisaged (e.g. administrative fines, prohibition orders, injunctions, market bans, civil enforcement actions)?
The draft does not include any specific new sanctions. In general, violation may result in claims by competitors or consumers associates for injunctive relief, removal, damages and publication of judgement as well as reimbursement of costs. Preliminary injunctions are available.
The national draft stipulates that for a period of three years any civil claims relating to the new provisions concerning goods may only be asserted if the goods in question were placed on the market after September 27, 2026.
5. Which authorities or institutions are competent for enforcement and supervision?
The draft does not include new rules on competent authorities and sanctions. Thus, private enforcement will continue being the primary means of enforcement.
6. Is there already specific case law on environmental claims and/or sustainability labels?
Yes, environmental claims are increasingly being challenged in Austria. Particularly claims referring to 'CO₂‑neutrality' have been subject to court proceedings in the recent past. Courts apply strict standards, requiring such claims to be specific, scientifically substantiated and transparently limited to the relevant stages of the product lifecycle. Furthermore, details and information on materials and origin have to be very precise. Consumer protection associations, most notably the Austrian Consumer Association (VKI), actively enforce these standards by initiating proceedings against unsubstantiated or vague sustainability claims.