Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
Regulation nation?
Key contacts
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency: Five things to watch
- mRNA
- Medtech
- Regulating AI
- Data
- Clinical trials
In the MHRA’s words, this is a highly competitive global market, with businesses seeking a reliable and responsive regulator. The MHRA aims to create faster risk-proportionate and predictable regulatory pathways to attract and support innovation – while observing its primary duties in relation to patient safety and public health.
It has spoken of its ambition to ‘cement the UK as a research powerhouse’ and position itself as an ‘engine of innovation' that helps to get cutting-edge new treatments and technologies to patients and the NHS faster. As well as introducing technology to expedite approvals and improved information sharing, it is developing broader plans to modernise the regulatory framework for medicines and medical devices, which we may hear more of during 2026.
The MHRA has experienced some capacity issues in recent years, partly because of budgetary constraints and staff turnover, as well as pressures relating to Covid, Brexit and its exit from the European Medicines Agency’s regulatory framework. However, it is now meeting most of its KPIs (although not its targets for delivering scientific advice).
When the UK left the EU, the MHRA lost significant fee income from its EU regulatory approvals work. It has also lost its status as a trading fund, becoming a market regulatory agency, dependent on the Department of Health and Social Care, of which it is an executive agency, to provide its capital budget (and some other funding). Consequently, its ability to make long-term investments depends on the department’s priorities and budget, which is under heavy pressure in multiple areas.
Scope
The MHRA oversees medicines and medical devices legislation in the UK and has a range of enforcement powers, including:
- rights to enter premises;
- powers of inspection;
- sampling and seizure; and
- ability to bring a criminal prosecution.
In practice, though, the MHRA’s approach has tended to favour regularising non-compliance, including by the issue of warning letters, notices or formal cautions, and reserved prosecutions for only the most persistent or serious of breaches.