AI Regulation Scanner

Low  

There are minimal or no AI-specific regulations in place. Existing laws may only indirectly apply to AI (e.g., general data protection or consumer protection laws). There is limited guidance from regulators, and enforcement is rare or unclear. 

Jurisdictions with low risk rating: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Chile, Colombia, Hong Kong, India, Kenya, Mexico, North Macedonia, Oman, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Türkiye, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates.

Medium 

Some AI-specific regulations or guidelines exist, but they are partial or sector-specific (e.g., healthcare, finance). There is moderate regulatory activity, such as consultations or draft frameworks, but enforcement mechanisms are still evolving. 

Jurisdictions with medium risk rating: Albania, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, China, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Singapore, South Africa, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom.

High 

Comprehensive AI-specific regulations are in force, covering key areas such as transparency, accountability, risk management, and ethical use. Regulators actively monitor compliance, issue guidance, and enforce penalties for non-compliance. There is a clear governance structure for AI oversight. 

Jurisdictions with high risk rating: Austria, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Peru, Slovenia, Spain.