-
A. Transfer pricing documentation requirements
- Are taxpayers obliged to maintain transfer pricing documentation? Does this obligation apply to all taxpayers, or only to certain categories (e.g. taxpayers with turnover or assets exceeding a particular threshold)?
- What is the content of the documentation that must be prepared?
- Which transactions must be documented (all transactions with associated enterprises, or only those which exceed a particular threshold)?
- What is the definition of “associated enterprises” for the purposes of this requirement (in particular, are transactions between a permanent establishment and its head office in the scope of the documentation requirement)?
- For EU countries, is the content of the documentation similar to that described in the EU Code of Conduct on transfer pricing documentation for associated enterprises (“EU TPD”)? If not, are taxpayers entitled to choose between the local requirements and the EU TPD?
- For all countries (and, in particular, OECD countries), is the content of the documentation similar to that described in the revisions to chapter V of the OECD transfer pricing guidelines (final report on Action 13 of the BEPS project)? If not, are taxpayers entitled to choose between the local requirements and the OECD approach?
- Do taxpayers which are not established in Italy need to undertake to provide any specific information upon request? Can your tax authorities require the taxpayer in your jurisdiction to provide information which is located in another state?
- If comparable studies are to be provided, do the tax authorities generally accept regional benchmark studies (e.g. pan-European benchmark studies)?
- If comparable studies are to be provided in general, are safe harbours/specific circumstances exempting taxpayers from preparing benchmark studies (such as the EU Joint Transfer Pricing Forum guidelines on low value adding services or revisions to chapter VII of the OECD transfer pricing guidelines about low value adding intragroup services) in your jurisdiction or are there situations in which tax authorities do not request benchmark studies? If so, in which circumstances taxpayers are exempted from benchmark studies?
- What language(s) are to be used by taxpayers in submitting the transfer pricing documentation?
- What is the deadline or timescale for providing TP documentation to the tax authorities - is it to be provided, for example, upon filing of the tax returns, at the beginning of a tax audit or on the specific request of the tax authorities?
- In the event that the documentation is not provided within the applicable timescale or is incomplete, do documentation-related penalties apply? If so, please detail the penalties and the circumstances in which they do and do not apply.
- Does the absence or incompleteness of documentation reverse the burden of proof as regards the arm’s length character of the transactions?
- In the event that the tax authorities (i) impose documentation-related penalties and (ii) make a transfer pricing reassessment, does the imposition of documentation- related penalties prevent the taxpayer from initiating any mutual agreement procedure which may be contained in an applicable tax treaty (or, for EU countries, the procedure contained in the EU Arbitration Convention) with a view to eliminating any double taxation resulting from the transfer pricing reassessment?
- Any other relevant aspect not addressed above?
-
B. Country-by-Country reporting ("CbCR")
- Has the obligation to file a CbCR been implemented? If not, is the introduction of the CbCR being considered, and if so, when?
- If the obligation to file a CbCR is in force, what is the tax year from which this obligation applies and what is the deadline for filing the CbCR?
- Which taxpayers are required to file a CbCR under the applicable laws?
- Is the content of the CbCR fully in line with the OECD model (final report on Action 13 of the BEPS project)? If not, what are the differences?
- What is the penalty for failing to file the CbCR on time? Can local subsidiaries of a foreign group suffer the local penalty if the foreign group has not filed the CbCR?
- Are there tax treaties in force allowing the communication of CbCR with other jurisdictions?
- Any other relevant aspect not addressed above?
-
C. As the case may be, other documentation / filing requirement in relation to transfer pricing?
- Are there any other documentation/filing requirements in relation to TP?
- If so, what is the content of such documentation / filing requirement? What language(s) are to be used by taxpayers?
- What is the deadline for meeting this documentation / filing requirement?
- Does this obligation apply to all taxpayers, or only to certain categories (e.g. taxpayers with turnover or assets exceeding a particular threshold)?
- What is the penalty for failing to meet this requirement on time?
- Any other relevant aspect not addressed above?
jurisdiction
A. Transfer pricing documentation requirements
1. Are taxpayers obliged to maintain transfer pricing documentation? Does this obligation apply to all taxpayers, or only to certain categories (e.g. taxpayers with turnover or assets exceeding a particular threshold)?
The Italian TP rules include:
- require the taxpayer to prepare transfer pricing documentation for Country-by-country report purposes correspondent to Annex III of Chapter V of the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines (provided that the conditions provided therein are met);
- do not require the taxpayer to prepare the Master File and Local File (TP Documentation) as an obligation;
- allow the taxpayer to prepare the TP Documentation in order to benefit from the “penalty protection” regime; accordingly, no penalties apply in case of a transfer pricing assessment should the taxpayer (i) prepare proper TP Documentation, and (ii) inform the Italian Revenue Agency about said TP Documentation (to that end, a specific box must be filled in on the relevant tax return).
In any case, the taxpayer should indicate the overall intercompany transactions’ volume in the tax return.
2. What is the content of the documentation that must be prepared?
2.1 Which transactions must be documented (all transactions with associated enterprises, or only those which exceed a particular threshold)?
As a general principle, all transactions with associated enterprises should be documented.
However, the taxpayer can:
- adopt a cherry-picking approach; accordingly, the transactions not selected nor described in the TP Documentation are excluded from the “penalty protection” regime;
- include only the transactions that have a marginal value (being those whose amount is higher than 5% of the overall intercompany transactions’ volume); accordingly, the transactions that have a marginal value and are not described in the TP Documentation are excluded from the “penalty protection regime”.
2.2 What is the definition of “associated enterprises” for the purposes of this requirement (in particular, are transactions between a permanent establishment and its head office in the scope of the documentation requirement)?
Pursuant to the definition of “associated enterprises”, a company is associated to another if one of them: i) participates, directly or indirectly, in the management, control or capital of the other; or ii) participates, directly or indirectly, in the management, control or share capital of both companies. Both “legal control" (i.e. participation higher than 50% in the capital, voting rights of profits of the company) and “de facto control” (i.e. dominant influence in the management of the company, according to contractual or equity obligations) shall be considered.
Transactions between a permanent establishment and its head office are included in the scope of the documentation requirement.
2.3 For EU countries, is the content of the documentation similar to that described in the EU Code of Conduct on transfer pricing documentation for associated enterprises (“EU TPD”)? If not, are taxpayers entitled to choose between the local requirements and the EU TPD?
Both taxpayers and tax authorities usually refer to EU TPD. However, in order to apply the above mentioned penalty protection regime there is a specific format required by the Italian Revenue Agency.
2.4 For all countries (and, in particular, OECD countries), is the content of the documentation similar to that described in the revisions to chapter V of the OECD transfer pricing guidelines (final report on Action 13 of the BEPS project)? If not, are taxpayers entitled to choose between the local requirements and the OECD approach?
Yes, but in order to apply the above mentioned penalty protection regime there is a specific format required by the Italian Revenue Agency.
2.5 Do taxpayers which are not established in Italy need to undertake to provide any specific information upon request? Can your tax authorities require the taxpayer in your jurisdiction to provide information which is located in another state?
Taxpayers who are not established in Italy do not need to provide specific information upon request. However, the Italian Revenue Agency may start an exchange of information procedure with the country where the taxpayer is established.
Moreover, the taxpayer should be ready to provide certain information on other entities of the group that are not established in Italy to support the transfer prices that have been adopted.
2.6 If comparable studies are to be provided, do the tax authorities generally accept regional benchmark studies (e.g. pan-European benchmark studies)?
A case-by-case approach should be adopted; generally, regional benchmark studies are accepted.
2.7 If comparable studies are to be provided in general, are safe harbours/specific circumstances exempting taxpayers from preparing benchmark studies (such as the EU Joint Transfer Pricing Forum guidelines on low value adding services or revisions to chapter VII of the OECD transfer pricing guidelines about low value adding intragroup services) in your jurisdiction or are there situations in which tax authorities do not request benchmark studies? If so, in which circumstances taxpayers are exempted from benchmark studies?
Taxpayers are never exempted from preparing benchmark studies if they want to benefit from the “penalty protection regime”. However:
- benchmark studies may be avoided for low value adding services and transactions that have a marginal value;
- benchmark studies’ financials may be updated every three years if the taxpayer qualifies as a small or medium-sized enterprise (assuming the benchmark study is based on information from publicly available resources and the business model as well as the economic conditions remain unchanged). Small and medium-sized enterprises are those with a turnover or revenue not exceeding EUR 50 million in the fiscal year, which the TP Documentation relates to. Entities that directly or indirectly control or are controlled by an entity that does not qualify as a small and medium-sized enterprise do not fall within this definition.
Safe harbours were set for royalties in the 1980s by a circular letter of the Tax administration; the latter sometimes still refers to these safe-harbour rules, but these rules are no longer reliable.
2.8 What language(s) are to be used by taxpayers in submitting the transfer pricing documentation?
The TP Documentation must be drafted in Italian, expect for (i) the Masterfile, which may also be drafted in English, and (ii) the annexes to the Local File, which may also be drafted in a language other than Italian (a translation in Italian must be available upon request in case of audit).
3. What is the deadline or timescale for providing TP documentation to the tax authorities - is it to be provided, for example, upon filing of the tax returns, at the beginning of a tax audit or on the specific request of the tax authorities?
The taxpayer who wants to benefit from the “penalty protection regime” must put a digital signature with a time stamp on the TP Documentation before the date of submission of the tax return for the relevant fiscal year, and the availability of the Documentation must be disclosed in the same tax return. Once digitally signed, the TP Documentation can be modified only in the case of submission of a supplementary tax return.
The TP Documentation can then be requested by the Tax Administration in case of tax audit or by means of a simple questionnaire. Under these circumstances the taxpayer must respect the term of 20 days for providing the TP Documentation to the relevant tax office in order not to lose the penalty protection regime.
4. In the event that the documentation is not provided within the applicable timescale or is incomplete, do documentation-related penalties apply? If so, please detail the penalties and the circumstances in which they do and do not apply.
Documentation-related penalties do not apply in Italy since the preparation of TP Documentation is not an obligation, but rather an option to benefit from the “penalty protection regime”.
In case of TP upward adjustment, or absent or improperly prepared TP Documentation, penalty protection would not be granted and the applicable penalty would range from between 90% and 180% of the higher taxes due.
5. Does the absence or incompleteness of documentation reverse the burden of proof as regards the arm’s length character of the transactions?
In theory, the absence or incompleteness of documentation does not reverse the burden of proof. However, in practice, in order to face tax authorities’ challenges to the adopted transfer prices, the taxpayer should not only oppose their calculations point by point, but also provide its own reconstruction of the said prices.
6. In the event that the tax authorities (i) impose documentation-related penalties and (ii) make a transfer pricing reassessment, does the imposition of documentation- related penalties prevent the taxpayer from initiating any mutual agreement procedure which may be contained in an applicable tax treaty (or, for EU countries, the procedure contained in the EU Arbitration Convention) with a view to eliminating any double taxation resulting from the transfer pricing reassessment?
Not applicable (documentation-related penalties are not provided for by Italian law).
7. Any other relevant aspect not addressed above?
Not applicable.
B. Country-by-Country reporting ("CbCR")
1. Has the obligation to file a CbCR been implemented? If not, is the introduction of the CbCR being considered, and if so, when?
Yes, as from fiscal year 2016, Italy has introduced CbCR obligations.
The taxpayer must comply with the CbCR legislation in accordance with Annex III to Chapter V of the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines (provided that the conditions set out therein are met).
2. If the obligation to file a CbCR is in force, what is the tax year from which this obligation applies and what is the deadline for filing the CbCR?
The obligation applies for fiscal years starting on 1 January 2016. The deadline for filing the CbCR is 12 months after the end of the relevant fiscal year. Furthermore, the taxpayer (i.e., the resident group company obliged to file the CbC report as identified under point 3. below) must notify – within the date of submission of the tax return for the relevant fiscal year – which is entity that will take care of CbC reporting for the MNE group.
3. Which taxpayers are required to file a CbCR under the applicable laws?
The obligation to file a CbCR applies to Italian resident companies controlling an MNE group with a
consolidated annual revenue of at least EUR 750 million in the immediately preceding fiscal year, and which are not controlled by persons different from individuals. However, under certain circumstances, the obligation to file a CbCR may also regard certain controlled Italian resident companies of an MNE group different from the parent company.
4. Is the content of the CbCR fully in line with the OECD model (final report on Action 13 of the BEPS project)? If not, what are the differences?
Yes, the content of the Italian CbCR is fully in line with the OECD model, and the ITA uses the exact CbCR models as prepared by the OECD.
5. What is the penalty for failing to file the CbCR on time? Can local subsidiaries of a foreign group suffer the local penalty if the foreign group has not filed the CbCR?
If the CbCR is not filed (or filed in delay), or the data and information are incomplete or incorrect, a penalty applies in a range between EUR 10,000 and EUR 50,000.
6. Are there tax treaties in force allowing the communication of CbCR with other jurisdictions?
Yes, most of the tax treaties signed by Italy include provisions for the exchange of information with other jurisdictions.
Also, Italy has agreed to exchange CbC information with all EU Member States under the Directive
2016/881/UE of 25 May 2016. With regard to non-EU Member States, Italy signed the Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on the Exchange of CbC Reports (CbC MCAA) on 27 January 2016, as well as it has entered into bilateral agreements for the exchange of CbC information.
7. Any other relevant aspect not addressed above?
Not Applicable
C. As the case may be, other documentation / filing requirement in relation to transfer pricing?
1. Are there any other documentation/filing requirements in relation to TP?
TP Documentation shall be prepared for the purposes of the Investment Management Exemption.
2. If so, what is the content of such documentation / filing requirement? What language(s) are to be used by taxpayers?
Same content of the TP Documentation described above under § A.2.
3. What is the deadline for meeting this documentation / filing requirement?
Same content of the TP Documentation described above under § A.3.
4. Does this obligation apply to all taxpayers, or only to certain categories (e.g. taxpayers with turnover or assets exceeding a particular threshold)?
The TP Documentation shall be prepared by investment managers (Italian and non-Italian tax resident, including that operating in Italy through a PE) that habitually (albeit with discretionary powers) in the name and/or on behalf of the foreign investment vehicle:
- concludes contracts for the purchase, sale or negotiation of financial instruments and receivables on behalf of the foreign investment vehicles (or and directly or indirectly controlled entities); or
- actively participates in the execution of these transactions, including preliminary and ancillary activities provided that certain conditions are met.
5. What is the penalty for failing to meet this requirement on time?
Not applicable.
6. Any other relevant aspect not addressed above?
Not applicable.