-
Cost and timing considerations
- Filing Fees: What are the official fees for filing a design application for a GUI? How do the fees scale with additional applications?
- Maintenance Fees: Are there any maintenance or renewal fees required to keep the design right in force? If so, what are they? When are they due?
- Processing Time: How long does it typically take from filing to grant of a design right for a GUI in your jurisdiction, assuming no Registry objections are identified?
- What is the self-disclosure period (e.g. the period in which disclosures by the proprietor do not count as prior art). For example, in the EU, there is a grace period of 12 months during which disclosures by an applicant will not count as prior art.
- Deferment: How long can a design application be deferred (e.g. prevented from being publicly disclosed)?
-
Formalities
- General Formalities: Is a Power of Attorney (“PoA”) required? Are there any other similar formalities required upon filing or within a set period after filing?
- Priority Claim formalities: Must any priority documents or WIPO DAS codes be filed along with the application or can they be filed late? What formalities are involved?
-
Examination
- Examination Process: Are design applications for GUIs examined for substantive requirements, or are they only subject to a formalities examination?
- Prior art: Are prior art searches performed by examiners?
- Priority Claim formalities: Are priority claims examined? If so, what is the process? Is there any guidance where priority is claimed from a design patent which might be visually different but might still cover the same subject matter?
- Opposition: Are design applications in your country open to opposition by third parties prior to grant?
-
Scope and Content of Applications
- Number of representations: how many representations are permitted in a single design?
- Sequences or Animations: where the GUI involves a sequence or animations – can these be protected within a single design application for a GUI? Is this protecting using a series of images showing the changes or are video uploads permitted?
- Written Disclaimers: Are written disclaimers allowed in design applications for GUIs? If so, what are the requirements or limitations?
- Drawing Conventions: Which drawing conventions are recognized in your jurisdiction for GUI design applications (e.g., line drawings, colour drawings, photographs, shading, etc?) Are multiple types of dotted lines permitted to represent different things or not?
- Other Relevant IP Rights and self-incrimination
-
Practical Considerations
- Common Pitfalls: What are some common pitfalls or challenges applicants face when seeking design protection for GUIs in your jurisdiction?
- Best Practices: What best practices would you recommend for applicants to ensure robust protection of their GUIs?
- Hague Agreement: How does your jurisdiction's approach to GUI design protection compare with provisions of the Hague Agreement? Are there any specific points to watch for when considering filing a Hague application covering your jurisdiction?
- Future Developments: Are there any anticipated changes in the law or practice regarding the protection of GUIs as design rights in your jurisdiction?
jurisdiction
Cost and timing considerations
1. Filing Fees: What are the official fees for filing a design application for a GUI? How do the fees scale with additional applications?
- The official fee for filing a design application with the Norwegian Intellectual Property Office (Patentstyret) is NOK 2 470 for one design.
- For subsequent designs (applied for at the same time), the additional fee is NOK 1 690 per design. It is a condition for such co-registration that the designs belong to the same class of the Locarno Classification.
2. Maintenance Fees: Are there any maintenance or renewal fees required to keep the design right in force? If so, what are they? When are they due?
- The registration must be renewed on its fifth anniversary, for up to a maximum of 25 years.
- Fees:
- 1st renewal: NOK 3 770
- 2nd renewal: NOK 4 550
- 3rd renewal: NOK 5 330
- 4th renewal: NOK 6 500
- Additional fee for each subsequent design for which the registration is renewed: NOK 1 690
3. Processing Time: How long does it typically take from filing to grant of a design right for a GUI in your jurisdiction, assuming no Registry objections are identified?
- As soon as the application has been submitted, it will be published in the design register of Patentstyret. The application will be published without the images showing the design.
- Patentstyret’s examination of the application, assuming that there are no refusals raised or issues with the application, can take up to three months.
- If there are any issues with the application, Patentstyret will notify the applicant, and give them a deadline for reply. If the applicant does not reply within such deadline, the application will be deferred.
- After Patentstyret’s examination, provided that the design applied for meets the conditions for registrable design as assessed by Patentstyret, the design will be registered.
4. What is the self-disclosure period (e.g. the period in which disclosures by the proprietor do not count as prior art). For example, in the EU, there is a grace period of 12 months during which disclosures by an applicant will not count as prior art.
The grace period is 12 months, and therefore the designer must file the application within the 12-month grace period (i.e. within 12 months of the first disclosure of the relevant design).
5. Deferment: How long can a design application be deferred (e.g. prevented from being publicly disclosed)?
Up to 6 months.
Formalities
6. General Formalities: Is a Power of Attorney (“PoA”) required? Are there any other similar formalities required upon filing or within a set period after filing?
In principle, filing a PoA is not required, but the applicant should generally be confident it is the legal owner of the design it is seeking to protect.
7. Priority Claim formalities: Must any priority documents or WIPO DAS codes be filed along with the application or can they be filed late? What formalities are involved?
- The priority claim must be included in the application. The claim must state the design authority to which the claimed application was filed, the date on which it was filed and the application number. If the claim does not contain this information Patentstyret will grant the applicant a period of one month to submit such information. It is optional to include priority documents in the application.
- Patentstyret may also require that the applicant submits a priority document within three months of such request. Such priority document must contain the information referred to above, the applicant’s name, a copy of the application and be certified by the design authority to which the claimed application was filed.
Examination
8. Examination Process: Are design applications for GUIs examined for substantive requirements, or are they only subject to a formalities examination?
Aside from formalities examination, Patentstyret’s examination of substantive protection requirements is limited to two grounds for non-registrability. A design application will be refused if it does not correspond to the definition of the design (e.g. it does not constitute the ‘appearance of a product’) or if it is contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality.
9. Prior art: Are prior art searches performed by examiners?
No. There is no substantive examination of the design, and the Patentstyret examiners will not examine the design’s novelty or individual character by reference to prior art. Post grant, third parties will be able to object to the registration by challenging the validity of the registration.
10. Priority Claim formalities: Are priority claims examined? If so, what is the process? Is there any guidance where priority is claimed from a design patent which might be visually different but might still cover the same subject matter?
- Priority claims are not examined. Patentstyret will only assess whether or not the relevant information regarding priority (see section 9a) is included.
- As for visual differences, the images of the designs may be differing, as long as the priority claim concerns the same design.
- Patentstyret will not examine the substantive requirements unless a third party objects to the priority and demands a review. In such case the examination will be based on the documentation submitted by the objector and the applicant.
11. Opposition: Are design applications in your country open to opposition by third parties prior to grant?
No, it’s not possible to oppose an EU design application at the application stage. The only opportunity to challenge a design is through an invalidity action after registration.
Scope and Content of Applications
12. Number of representations: how many representations are permitted in a single design?
The design must be represented by at least one view, with a maximum of seven views allowed per design.
13. Sequences or Animations: where the GUI involves a sequence or animations – can these be protected within a single design application for a GUI? Is this protecting using a series of images showing the changes or are video uploads permitted?
- The relevant animation must be represented by including in the design application a clear sequence of the animation, specifically by filing a series of static images, for example via a single self-contained ‘screen shot’ of the static interface layout.
- For movable designs, Patentstyret may require that a description of the design, and possibly a sample of it stored on a suitable medium, be submitted.
14. Written Disclaimers: Are written disclaimers allowed in design applications for GUIs? If so, what are the requirements or limitations?
No written disclaimers are permitted. The representation of the views of the design must by themselves show the scope of protection the applicant is seeking. Accordingly, where the applicant wishes to disclaim any feature of a design this must be shown visually (graphically), typically through the use of dotted lines around any area or features of the design to which protection is not sought, or by simply showing only the feature for which protection is sought.
15. Drawing Conventions: Which drawing conventions are recognized in your jurisdiction for GUI design applications (e.g., line drawings, colour drawings, photographs, shading, etc?) Are multiple types of dotted lines permitted to represent different things or not?
- The images of the design can be submitted as photographs, drawings or other graphic representations suitable for electronic recording, storage and reproduction. If the design is to be registered in colour, images and models must be in colour.
- The below images illustrate some of Patentstyret’s issued guidelines on the preferred drawing conventions.
Other Relevant IP Rights and self-incrimination
16. Additional IP Rights: Are there other intellectual property rights that can be used to protect GUIs in your jurisdiction (e.g., copyright, trade marks)?
- A GUI can also be protected by copyright qualifying as a graphic work provided it is original, in the sense that it is not copied from an existing work.
- It is also possible to protect a GUIs by filing for protection as a trade mark through the registration of elements in the GUIs, such as the screen display, icons, brands or logos.
17. Overlap with Other IP Rights: How do these other IP rights interact with or limit design rights for GUIs?
The additional IP rights co-exist alongside any registered design right. By way of example, a GUI may be protected as a registered design, with the protection lasting for a maximum duration of 25 years. Concurrently, if the GUI or elements of the GUI such as logos or other artwork qualifies as a graphic work, it may have the benefit of copyright protection which lasts for the lifetime of the creator (i.e. the designer) plus 70 years after their death. At the same time, a GUI can be registered as a trade mark, lasting indefinitely if renewed.
Practical Considerations
18. Common Pitfalls: What are some common pitfalls or challenges applicants face when seeking design protection for GUIs in your jurisdiction?
- Seeking to protect design ideas or concepts: design applications for GUIs are most likely to face obstacles where they seek to protect design principles or ideas (such as a type of motion sequence, a style of movement, a method of transformation of on-screen elements, or an animation concept) which could visually manifest in a variety of ways. Norwegian registered designs only protect the specific appearance of the filed design, against others using designs producing the “same overall impression”. Designers should take account of the limitations of the registered designs system when seeking protection for visual design principles.
- Excluding variable design elements from protection: although the applicant can include disclaimers/limitations in their design application, there is a difficulty with attempting to exclude content that is likely to change with use/when being interacted with by the user, and which is therefore dynamic and not ‘fixed’. There is often added complexity when the design needs to exclude specific elements which may change and evolve, and which the applicant is not seeking to protect, whilst still claiming protection in the overall appearance of the GUI.
19. Best Practices: What best practices would you recommend for applicants to ensure robust protection of their GUIs?
- Along with submitting multiple representations to accurately define your GUI, it is also important to use disclaimers to ensure the application is not invalidated by giving the impression that additional sequences/animations are intended to be protected.
- We recommend professional legal advice is sought to obtain expert advice on the best way to present your GUIs.
20. Hague Agreement: How does your jurisdiction's approach to GUI design protection compare with provisions of the Hague Agreement? Are there any specific points to watch for when considering filing a Hague application covering your jurisdiction?
When receiving notice from the WIPO about an international application designating Norway, Patentstyret will conduct an examination of the two grounds for non-registrability (if the design submitted corresponds with the definition of a design or if it is contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality). If the conditions for registrability are not met, Patentstyret will refuse, in whole or in part, to allow the international registration to take effect in Norway. If the conditions for registrability are met, Patentstyret will enter the international registration in the design register and announce that it has effect in Norway.
21. Future Developments: Are there any anticipated changes in the law or practice regarding the protection of GUIs as design rights in your jurisdiction?
No anticipated changes.