Home / Europe / United Kingdom / Dispute Resolution / Judicial Review

Judicial Review

Back to Dispute Resolution

When a public body or official has made a decision that impacts on an industry, sector or project, sometimes the last available resort is to challenge the decision on legal or procedural grounds by way of judicial review. A party involved in a challenge needs the support of a team who understands their industry and the challenge process.

At CMS, we act for claimants, defendants and interested parties, often in regulated industries and in respect of regulator decisions. We have specialist expertise in challenges to planning, compulsory purchase and other development consent decisions. Understanding our client’s industry and organisation and the relevant powers and procedure under which the decision is made is vital to a successful outcome. Our industry sector experts work together with our disputes and public law specialists to assist clients through the process.

Our Planning Team also advises on minimising risk of challenge through the preparation and promotion of applications, including scrutinising the exercise of powers and decision making procedures.

Public bodies often carry out consultations before making a decision on policy or regulation.  We work with clients throughout this process to analyse the impact of the potential decision on their businesses and industry and to seek a positive outcome through the consultation process to avoid the need for judicial review. Where our clients remain dissatisfied with the final decision, we support them through the analysis – whether there are grounds for challenge on the traditional or evolving bases – and process to a final outcome.

Our experience includes advising:

  • AEG Presents Limited in a judicial review claim and a procurement claim brought by its global rival, Live Nation (Music) UK Ltd, against the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport and The Royal Parks relating to the tender process for the 2020-2025 contract for British Summer Time Hyde Park music festival.
  • The Arora Group as an interested party in defending judicial review litigation relating to runway expansion at Heathrow Airport.
  • EDF defending an application by local business to challenge permission in relation to 59 turbine windfarm.
  • Department for Transport on several high profile, multi party public procurement/judicial review and bid costs challenges to its rail franchising decisions.
  • Cory/Wheelabrator JV on the successful defence of a Judicial Review taken by a campaign group aimed at preventing a waste to energy incinerator project.
  • Gravis Solar on a judicial review challenge of Ofgem’s decision to revoke accreditation and withdraw state aid grants subsidies. 
  • Community Windpower in a judicial review of Ministry of Defence policy/decisions on noise budgets.

"They boast an impressive team at all levels, enabling them to provide an efficient and cost-effective service tailored to a client's specific needs."

Chambers, 2024

"Alison Gow is extremely hard-working and client-focused. She has a broad range of expertise across all areas of real estate dispute resolution."

Chambers, 2024

Dan Tench is praised as someone who "always has his clients' corner and can litigate in a variety of different contexts."

Chambers, 2021
Law-Now: Dispute Resolution
Visit Law-Now for legal know-how and commentary

Feed

23/11/2022
Protection from protests
Protest on the streets, protest online, even litigation used as a vehicle for protest. Protestors targeting a business may be standing in a crowd, holding a placard or shouting slogans. But they may also be behind a computer screen or pursuing a claim against the business through the courts. They may even be working inside the business, preparing to compromise its systems or leak confidential information. Whether they are activists, employees or customers, all these protestors may present a substantial challenge and a real threat to businesses, in areas including its security, reputation and bottom line. 
02/11/2022
Risk Essentials: Season of Protest
Protests are everywhere. There are protests on the streets and outside business premises. There are protests online. Your workforce is protesting. Even litigation is being used as a means of protest...
01/12/2021
Disputes 101: CMS Autumn Webinar Series 2021
Welcome to the Disputes 101: CMS Autumn Webinar Series 2021 This series originally took place over 11 weeks, every Wednesday from 8 September – 1 December 2021 at 2-3pm. Partners and associates from...
10/09/2020
Privilege: What you need to know
Privilege is an important, and complex, issue that arises in contexts ranging from investigations and expert reports, to multi-party litigation and settlement negotiations, as well as day-to-day com­mu­nic­a­tions...
18/04/2017
Disputes digest
Welcome to our Spring edition of Disputes Digest. In this edition, we look back at 2016 and summarise the key litigation and arbitration cases of 2016 for corporate counsel to be aware of. We also...
29/09/2016
Disputes digest
Welcome to the fourth edition of Disputes Digest, featuring commentary and analysis on the latest developments in dispute resolution across the UK and beyond. Over the summer, the debate over the legal...