Home / People / Dan Tench
Dan Tench

Dan Tench


CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP
Cannon Place
78 Cannon Street
United Kingdom
Languages English, Spanish

Dan Tench is a litigator with particular expertise in judicial review, competition law, media law (including data protection, privacy and defamation) and sports law, undertaking many leading cases in all these areas (see under the “Experience” tab).

Dan has advised bringing and defending major judicial reviews and other administrative law challenges and on competition litigation cases. Many of his public law matters have involved issues of significant political controversy and he has exceptional experience in aligning an approach to litigation with broader political and media concerns. He has prepared senior individuals for appearances before (and attended with them at) Parliamentary Select Committees.

Dan has also substantial experience in advising claimants and defendants in defamation, privacy and other media litigation matters including general reputation management matters, securing injunctions and judgments in leading edge internet cases as well as bringing and defending claims for and against all types of traditional media. He has been involved in responding to many significant data security breach situations with a targeted strategy to minimise the damage, potential liability and disruption caused to the client. He acted for the claimants in the leading data protection case of Vidal-Hall & Ors v Google.

Dan has regularly written for and appeared on the national media including The Guardian, The Times, BBC and Channel 4 News. He also co-founded the Supreme Court Blog launched as a joint venture between Matrix Chambers and legacy firm Olswang.

Aside from his legal practice, Dan tutors a local student in further maths as part of one of the firm’s outreach projects. He was in The Lawyer's Hot 100 for 2012 and was The Times’ “Lawyer of the Week” in spring 2015.

more less

"Dan Tench heads the firm's public law offering and "combines his experience in media with cutting-edge public law challenges." He is further praised for his "very sound judgement" and "his 360-degree view towards problems."

Chambers, 2017

"Dan Tench maintains a diverse practice with a central focus on handling complex litigation proceedings in the areas of media, competition and sports law, in addition to data protection. Sources say he is "a very analytical and careful" lawyer with the "best mindset to pick his way through the thicket" of data protection law."

Chambers, 2017

"Dan Tench is considered a "guru" in the field of defamation and reputation management. Clients say: "He is ludicrously bright, with a pragmatic approach to problem-solving, which is a winning combination."

Chambers, 2017

"Dan Tench "is super smart and very good at applying the theoretical side of things to get a practical result," according to sources. He has acted in a large number of high-profile defamation and reputation management cases, including an action brought against Google regarding its use of tracking cookies to obtain information about Safari users."

Chambers, 2016

"Dan Tench maintains a wide-ranging litigation practice taking in media, administrative and human rights law proceedings, as well as privacy and data protection. Clients are forthcoming with their praise, saying: "Dan really takes the time to get into the detail and to look at things from a very company-focused perspective."

Chambers, 2016

"Dan Tench handles complex administrative law and judicial review cases. Sources say: "He is a bright lawyer who has very good judgement and is good strategically."

Chambers, 2016

Relevant experience

  • The Claimants in the judicial review of the UK Government’s proposals to apply betting and gaming duty to offshore gambling operators. The case resulted in a reference to the European Court of the European Union on issues which will determine the validity of the taxation legislation.
  • The UK Music industry successfully challenging the lawfulness of legislation to allow for the private copying of content without compensation to rightholders.
  • Tottenham Hotspur Football Club on its successful judicial review brought in respect of the Olympic Stadium
  • British Horseracing Authority on a judicial review of the Horseracing Betting Levy Board regarding the liability of betting exchanges to pay horseracing betting levy.
  • Three telecoms operators in their successful defence (as regards substance) and challenge (as regards interest) of a decision of Ofcom in relation to ethernet charges.
  • The Post Office in respect of its programme for selecting and closing sub post offices at part of its Network Change Programme, providing public law advice in respect of the Programme and defending on behalf of the Post Office six separate challenges by way of judicial review, all of which were defeated.
  • Wimbledon Football Club on its successful review of the refusal of the Football League to grant permission to relocate to Milton Keynes, one of the most significant sports law administrative challenges.
  • Ingenious Media on judicial review of HMRC in relation the decision of its Permanent Secretary to make disparaging disclosures regarding the Chief Executive of Ingenious Media to journalists (a case which is now going to the Supreme Court).
  • The Claimants in the leading data protection case of Vidal-Hall & Ors v Google.
  • News International in respect of a variety of matters concerning allegations of voicemail interception including accompanying Rupert and James Murdoch at their attendance before the Culture Media and Sport Select Committee in July 2011 and acting for News Group Newspapers on numerous claims for voicemail interception brought against the News of the World.
  • English PEN, Article 19 and Index on Censorship as interested parties in the Supreme Court resisting an injunction imposed to prevent the publication of an autobiographical book.
more less


  • 1991 - Common Professional Examination, Law Society Finals (distinction); College of Law, London
  • 1988 - Natural Sciences, Social and Political Studies; Cambridge University, Gonville & Caius College, Cambridge
more less


Show only
9 April 2020
Rene­go­ti­at­ing or can­cel­ling com­mer­cial ar­range­ments in light of COV­ID-19
The spread of COV­ID-19 po­ten­tially un­der­mines the vi­ab­il­ity of a huge range of com­mer­cial ar­range­ments, from­con­tracts for one-off (or mul­tiple) events to long term sup­ply con­tracts. The reas­ons why these...
21 December 2020
CMS Ex­pert Guide to on­line gambling law and reg­u­la­tion in Europe
The gambling in­dustry is con­stantly in a state of change. Check out this Ex­pert Guide to see the gambling leg­al land­scape and who to con­tact for any gambling reg­u­lat­ory con­cerns.Al­though this re­source...
03 November 2020
Dis­putes 101: Reg­u­lat­ory Ac­tion and Pub­lic Law Claims
It is be­com­ing in­creas­ingly es­sen­tial for in-house law­yers and non-law­yers at all levels to have an un­der­stand­ing of the dis­putes pro­cess.  Our new Dis­putes 101 we­bin­ar series will cov­er fun­da­ment­al...
06 July 2020
Ser­afin v Malk­iewicz - un­fair tri­als and the pub­lic in­terest de­fence in...
The Su­preme Court’s judg­ment in Ser­afin v Malk­iewicz and oth­ers [2020] UK­SC 23 is not­able for two reas­ons: It up­held the trenchant cri­ti­cism made by the Court of Ap­peal of the first in­stance judge...
28 May 2019
In­teg­rity and trans­par­ency
‘Ar­ti­fi­cial In­tel­li­gence (AI) is one of the most trans­form­at­ive forces of our time, and is bound to al­ter the fab­ric of so­ci­ety,’ the European Com­mis­sion’s High Level Ex­pert Group on Ar­ti­fi­cial...
27 October 2020
Dis­putes 101: Repu­ta­tion Man­age­ment
It is be­com­ing in­creas­ingly es­sen­tial for in-house law­yers and non-law­yers at all levels to have an un­der­stand­ing of the dis­putes pro­cess.  Our new Dis­putes 101 we­bin­ar series will cov­er fun­da­ment­al...
03 June 2020
New reg­u­la­tion paves way for GDPR-size fines for con­sumer law breaches
New con­sumer reg­u­la­tions come in­to force in the UK on 2 June 2020, im­ple­ment­ing changes re­quired by one of the fi­nal EU Reg­u­la­tions ad­op­ted pri­or to the UK’s de­par­ture from the EU, and pav­ing the way...
March 2018
Fi­nal Count­down to GDPR
GDPR took ef­fect across the European Uni­on in May 2018, and pri­vacy com­pli­ance has ris­en up the agenda for all busi­nesses hand­ling per­son­al data. Re-watch we­binars in the series which took a prac­tic­al...
20 October 2020
Dis­putes 101: Emer­gency Meas­ures
It is be­com­ing in­creas­ingly es­sen­tial for in-house law­yers and non-law­yers at all levels to have an un­der­stand­ing of the dis­putes pro­cess.  Our new Dis­putes 101 we­bin­ar series will cov­er fun­da­ment­al...
05 May 2020
CMA launches an in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to Cov­id-19 re­lated can­cel­la­tion and re­fund...
Around six weeks after launch­ing its COV­ID-19 taskforce to deal with com­pet­i­tion and con­sumer is­sues arising from the coronavir­us pan­dem­ic, on 30 April 2020 the Com­pet­i­tion and Mar­kets Au­thor­ity (“CMA”)...
14 April 2020
Gambling Com­mis­sion Pub­lishes Reas­on­ing for Triple­b­et's Li­cence Sus­pen­sion
On 8 April 2020, the Gambling Com­mis­sion (“the Com­mis­sion”) pub­lished its reas­on­ing for the pack­age of sanc­tions it handed down to on­line gambling op­er­at­or Triple­b­et on 17 Feb­ru­ary 2020, which in­cluded...
03 April 2020
Re­cord £13m set­tle­ment agreed with Caesars En­ter­tain­ment fol­low­ing a cata­logue...
On 2 April 2020, the Gambling Com­mis­sion (the “Com­mis­sion”) agreed a re­cord £13m reg­u­lat­ory set­tle­ment with Caesars En­ter­tain­ment UK Lim­ited (“Caesars”) in re­la­tion to anti-money laun­der­ing...