Home / People / Dan Tench
Dan Tench

Dan Tench


CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP
Cannon Place
78 Cannon Street
United Kingdom
Languages English, Spanish

Dan Tench is a litigator with particular expertise in judicial review, competition law, media law (including data protection, privacy and defamation) and sports law, undertaking many leading cases in all these areas (see under the “Experience” tab).

Dan has advised bringing and defending major judicial reviews and other administrative law challenges and on competition litigation cases. Many of his public law matters have involved issues of significant political controversy and he has exceptional experience in aligning an approach to litigation with broader political and media concerns. He has prepared senior individuals for appearances before (and attended with them at) Parliamentary Select Committees.

Dan has also substantial experience in advising claimants and defendants in defamation, privacy and other media litigation matters including general reputation management matters, securing injunctions and judgments in leading edge internet cases as well as bringing and defending claims for and against all types of traditional media. He has been involved in responding to many significant data security breach situations with a targeted strategy to minimise the damage, potential liability and disruption caused to the client. He acted for the claimants in the leading data protection case of Vidal-Hall & Ors v Google.

Dan has regularly written for and appeared on the national media including The Guardian, The Times, BBC and Channel 4 News. He also co-founded the Supreme Court Blog launched as a joint venture between Matrix Chambers and legacy firm Olswang.

Aside from his legal practice, Dan tutors a local student in further maths as part of one of the firm’s outreach projects. He was in The Lawyer's Hot 100 for 2012 and was The Times’ “Lawyer of the Week” in spring 2015.

more less

"Dan Tench heads the firm's public law offering and "combines his experience in media with cutting-edge public law challenges." He is further praised for his "very sound judgement" and "his 360-degree view towards problems."

Chambers, 2017

"Dan Tench maintains a diverse practice with a central focus on handling complex litigation proceedings in the areas of media, competition and sports law, in addition to data protection. Sources say he is "a very analytical and careful" lawyer with the "best mindset to pick his way through the thicket" of data protection law."

Chambers, 2017

"Dan Tench is considered a "guru" in the field of defamation and reputation management. Clients say: "He is ludicrously bright, with a pragmatic approach to problem-solving, which is a winning combination."

Chambers, 2017

"Dan Tench "is super smart and very good at applying the theoretical side of things to get a practical result," according to sources. He has acted in a large number of high-profile defamation and reputation management cases, including an action brought against Google regarding its use of tracking cookies to obtain information about Safari users."

Chambers, 2016

"Dan Tench maintains a wide-ranging litigation practice taking in media, administrative and human rights law proceedings, as well as privacy and data protection. Clients are forthcoming with their praise, saying: "Dan really takes the time to get into the detail and to look at things from a very company-focused perspective."

Chambers, 2016

"Dan Tench handles complex administrative law and judicial review cases. Sources say: "He is a bright lawyer who has very good judgement and is good strategically."

Chambers, 2016

Relevant experience

  • The Claimants in the judicial review of the UK Government’s proposals to apply betting and gaming duty to offshore gambling operators. The case resulted in a reference to the European Court of the European Union on issues which will determine the validity of the taxation legislation.
  • The UK Music industry successfully challenging the lawfulness of legislation to allow for the private copying of content without compensation to rightholders.
  • Tottenham Hotspur Football Club on its successful judicial review brought in respect of the Olympic Stadium
  • British Horseracing Authority on a judicial review of the Horseracing Betting Levy Board regarding the liability of betting exchanges to pay horseracing betting levy.
  • Three telecoms operators in their successful defence (as regards substance) and challenge (as regards interest) of a decision of Ofcom in relation to ethernet charges.
  • The Post Office in respect of its programme for selecting and closing sub post offices at part of its Network Change Programme, providing public law advice in respect of the Programme and defending on behalf of the Post Office six separate challenges by way of judicial review, all of which were defeated.
  • Wimbledon Football Club on its successful review of the refusal of the Football League to grant permission to relocate to Milton Keynes, one of the most significant sports law administrative challenges.
  • Ingenious Media on judicial review of HMRC in relation the decision of its Permanent Secretary to make disparaging disclosures regarding the Chief Executive of Ingenious Media to journalists (a case which is now going to the Supreme Court).
  • The Claimants in the leading data protection case of Vidal-Hall & Ors v Google.
  • News International in respect of a variety of matters concerning allegations of voicemail interception including accompanying Rupert and James Murdoch at their attendance before the Culture Media and Sport Select Committee in July 2011 and acting for News Group Newspapers on numerous claims for voicemail interception brought against the News of the World.
  • English PEN, Article 19 and Index on Censorship as interested parties in the Supreme Court resisting an injunction imposed to prevent the publication of an autobiographical book.
more less


  • 1991 - Common Professional Examination, Law Society Finals (distinction); College of Law, London
  • 1988 - Natural Sciences, Social and Political Studies; Cambridge University, Gonville & Caius College, Cambridge
more less


Show only
CMS Ex­pert Guide to On­line Gambling Reg­u­la­tion in Europe
15 Jan 20
New MLR guid­ance
On 10 Janu­ary 2020 the Gambling Com­mis­sion is­sued up­dated guid­ance to re­mote and non-re­mote casi­nos on the pre­ven­tion of money laun­der­ing and com­bat­ing the fin­an­cing of ter­ror­ism (the “Guid­ance”,...
March 2018
Fi­nal Count­down to GDPR
We­bin­ar Re­cord­ings
29 Nov 19
Gibral­tar’s status with­in the EU
AG opin­ion ad­voc­ates strict in­ter­pret­a­tion of EU dir­ect­ive, but con­firms dis­crim­in­at­ory nature of Bul­gari­an le­gis­la­tion con­trary to free­dom of es­tab­lish­ment The opin­ion of Ad­voc­ate Gen­er­al Hogan (the...
20 Sep 19
Gambling Com­mis­sion im­pose £1.8 mil­lion fine on Park Lane Club op­er­at­or
On 11 Septem­ber 2019, the Gambling Com­mis­sion (“the Com­mis­sion”) is­sued Sil­ver­bond En­ter­prises Lim­ited (“Sil­ver­bond”) a £1.8 mil­lion fine, an op­er­at­or li­cence warn­ing and ad­di­tion­al con­di­tions...
16 Sep 19
The pro­rog­a­tion of the UK Par­lia­ment: CMS to live blog from the UK...
Widely dubbed the con­sti­tu­tion­al case of the cen­tury, on Tues­day 17 Septem­ber 2019 the UK Su­preme Court will hear three ap­peals - one from each of the leg­al jur­is­dic­tions mak­ing up the United King­dom...
05 Aug 19
Gambling Com­mis­sion reg­u­lat­ory set­tle­ment with Lad­brokes Cor­al Group
On 31 Ju­ly 2019, GVC Hold­ings PLC (“GVC”) con­cluded a reg­u­lat­ory set­tle­ment with the Gambling Com­mis­sion (the “Com­mis­sion”) in re­la­tion to anti-money laun­der­ing and so­cial re­spons­ib­il­ity fail­ings...
19 Jul 19
Gambling Com­mis­sion im­poses new li­cence con­di­tions for Casino 36
On 11 Ju­ly 2019, Casino 36 Lim­ited (“Casino 36”) con­cluded a reg­u­lat­ory set­tle­ment with the Gambling Com­mis­sion (the “Com­mis­sion”) after Casino 36 was found to have breached both its Li­cence Con­di­tions,...
11 Jul 19
Rights in sports data
The judg­ment of Za­car­oli J handed down in The Ra­cing Part­ner­ship Ltd & Ors v Done Broth­ers (Cash Bet­ting) Ltd & Ors [2019] EWHC 1156 is of sig­ni­fic­ant in­terest and gen­er­al im­port­ance prin­cip­ally for two...
05 Jul 19
Money Laun­der­ing and Ter­ror­ist Fin­an­cing Risk As­sess­ment 2018
On 26 June 2019, the Gambling Com­mis­sion (The “Com­mis­sion”) pub­lished its money laun­der­ing and ter­ror­ist fin­an­cing risk as­sess­ment for 2018 (the “Re­port”). The Re­port cov­ers the peri­od from 1...
02 Jul 19
Gambling Com­mis­sion’s En­force­ment Re­port
On 27 June 2019, the Gambling Com­mis­sion (the “Com­mis­sion”) pub­lished its an­nu­al en­force­ment re­port, ‘Rais­ing Stand­ards for Con­sumers’ (the “Re­port”), which provides an over­view of the en­force­ment...
26 Jun 19
More Gambling Com­mis­sion fines for op­er­at­ors
Over the past two months, the Gambling Com­mis­sion ("Com­mis­sion") has an­nounced in three de­cisions (here, here and here) fur­ther sub­stan­tial fines against a num­ber of on­line casino op­er­at­ors in re­la­tion...