Home / Europe / United Kingdom / Insurance / Defendant Personal Injury

Defendant Personal Injury

Back to Insurance

The CMS Defendant Personal Injury team is ranked Tier 1 in the Legal 500 and specialises in the defence of personal injury claims on behalf of public bodies, insurers and self-insured corporate clients. The team has particular expertise in the field of group litigation, unmatched by any other defendant injury team in the country. Our expertise includes:

  • Catastrophic injury/ complex injury claims
  • Employer’s and public liability
  • Psychiatric injury, including workplace stress
  • Civil claims investigation, litigation strategy and negotiation
  • Occupational disease
  • Occupier’s liability
  • Health and safety
  • Alternative dispute resolution
  • Attritional trauma and disease claims 
  • Cross-border clams and litigation/ disputes
  • Claim valuation
  • Emotional/ psychological harm claims following data breach  

Corporate Services: We have considerable experience acting for large public and corporate bodies. As well as handling litigated personal injury claims, we also advise corporates on emerging risks and provide training to employers to help reduce the incidence of claims, increase claims defensibility and reduce claims costs.

Dispute resolution: We help our clients avoid litigation and provide expert advice to resolve disputes where possible. Our advice is clear, commercial and conscious of reputational risk. We will vigorously defend unmeritorious claims.

Costs: As legal costs are increasingly a significant factor in all dispute resolution, the team now has a dedicated costs unit to further enhance our service to clients across CMS, minimising costs spend, maximising costs recovery and providing strategic costs advice.

Full Service: As a full-service firm, we work closely with colleagues in areas such as construction, health and safety and employment to provide comprehensive personal injury advice focused on achieving the best outcome. Our cross-disciplinary team is available 24/7 365 via our Emergency Response hotline, supporting clients with a variety of crisis incidents.

Examples of CMS' defendant personal injury work

  • A national construction supplies company in relation to a claim for vicarious and direct liability following a workplace “prank” which resulted in personal injury. The landmark decision further clarified the boundaries of vicarious liability and the duty of care owed by employers to those who sustain injury in such circumstances.
  • A discontinuance in relation to a catastrophic RTA allegedly caused by a defective new road surface. CMS acted for the company which laid the surface and faced a claim in excess of £1M.
  • A government department in the defence of a group litigation order (GLO) in respect of 290 former coke workers suffering from a range of disabilities and injuries, including lung cancer, skin cancer and a variety of non-malignant respiratory diseases. The claims involved the operation of coke works in 14 different locations over a period of 60 years.
  • Representing the insurers of an individual who sustained multiple injuries, including a serious head injury, in an RTA in the UAE. Advising in relation to a potential recovery action. Collaboration with CMS Dubai to investigate and advise.
  • The insurers of a UK resident sued following a skiing accident in Italy. The claim alleged severe traumatic brain and hamstring injury. Reflecting the litigation risk to both sides, claim settled prior to issue of proceedings for substantially less than the potential value without admission of liability.
  • Multiple confidential clients in relation to civil claims for damages for distress, psychiatric injury and financial loss following data breach incidents. Working with the CMS Cyber team, the defendant personal injury team advised on liability, quantum and potential for group claims, as well as grounds for claims for misuse of private information, breach of confidence and breach of statutory duty under the Data Protection Act and GDPR.

For more information and detailed credentials, contact the Partner team, details above.

"No other defendant firm has been involved in as much high profile, high value, heavy PI litigation (with a particular emphasis on industrial disease) as CMS. That’s reflected in the high quality of the staff, led by the effective combination of Tim Riordan and Jeremy Fletcher."

Legal 500, 2023

A very efficient team in all aspects of personal injury litigation.

Legal 500, 2022

All members of the [CMS Defendant Personal Injury] team work extremely effectively together. Some major tasks and others at short notice require collective working to tight deadlines which are always completed to a high degree of professionalism. There really is a one for all and all for one attitude.

Legal 500, 2021
CMS Emergency Response Support Line
Advising the Board

Feed

13/03/2024
Court of Appeal rules that defence of illegality in civil claim is not...
In Lewis-Ranwell v G4S Health Services (UK) Ltd and others [2024] EWCA Civ 138, the Court of Appeal recently held, by a majority of 2 to 1, that where a person has committed a crime, but has been found...
07/03/2024
University’s Duties towards Disabled Student - The University of Bristol...
This judgment concerns the tragic case of a second-year physics student at the University of Bristol (the “Uni­ver­sity”) who ended her own life in April 2018. She had been diagnosed with depression...
28/02/2024
The Scottish Court gives important guidance on management of Scottish class...
The Scottish Court of Session has recently issued a decision that provides important guidance on the management of Scottish class actions. In particular, the court made it clear that it will not un­ques­tion­ingly...
23/02/2024
Scottish wildcat group’s challenge to windfarm permission unsuccessful
Wildcat Haven, a community interest company, sought to challenge the decision of the Scottish Ministers to grant permission for construction of a new wind farm at Clashindarroch Forest in Aberdeenshire...
22/02/2024
Establishing liability under the Third Parties (Rights against Insurers)...
The Scottish Court of Session has, for the first time, considered what is required to establish a ‘liability’ for the purposes of the Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act 2010 (the “2010...
20/02/2024
Court of Appeal confirms position on damages for breach of public procurement...
The much anticipated judgment in the Braceurself appeal has been handed down by the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal (led by LJ Coulson) has reaffirmed the position established by the High Court that...
12/02/2024
High Court rules in favour of reinsureds seeking recovery of UK COVID-19...
Overview The High Court has, for the first time, considered the reinsurance recovery of non-damage COVID-19 (first lockdown) business interruption losses, specifically under catastrophe excess of loss...
12/02/2024
Commission Recovery Limited v Marks & Clerk LLP: the Court of Appeal leaves...
The representative proceedings mechanism codified in CPR r 19.8(1) allows a claimant to pursue an opt-out class action as the representative of a wider class, provided that they and all members of the...
29/01/2024
ClientEarth v FCA - The IEA and The Strength of the North Sea
Sum­maryC­li­en­tEarth’s renewed application for permission to apply for judicial review of the decision of the Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”) to approve the prospectus of Ithaca Energy plc...
25/01/2024
Land Options: High Court rules on validity of tenant’s option to buy freehold
The tenant of three leases, which were protected by the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, gave notice to exercise an option to the buy the freehold of the properties in the final week of a ten-year period...
24/01/2024
Esports Winter, Player Salary Caps and Online Toxicity: Unpacking ESI London...
CMS was one of a few law firms learning more about the ever-developing esports and gaming industry at the ESI London 2023 conference. CMS attendees Andrew Wilson, Chloe Day and Sarojah Sathivelu were...
17/01/2024
Sweeper clauses – are they a commitment to potentially ruinous costs?
Although subject to an application for appeal, the recent Court of Appeal decision in 89 Holland Park (Management) Ltd v Dell provides both:(i)          comfort to tenants that the courts are...