Home / Europe / United Kingdom / Insurance / Defendant Personal Injury

Defendant Personal Injury

Back to Insurance

The CMS Defendant Personal Injury team specialises in the defence of personal injury claims on behalf of public bodies, insurers and self-insured corporate clients. The team has particular expertise in the field of group litigation, unmatched by any other defendant injury team in the country. Our expertise includes:

  • Catastrophic injury/ complex injury claims
  • Employer’s and public liability
  • Psychiatric injury, including workplace stress
  • Civil claims investigation, litigation strategy and negotiation
  • Occupational disease
  • Occupier’s liability
  • Health and safety
  • Alternative dispute resolution
  • Attritional trauma and disease claims 
  • Cross-border clams and litigation/ disputes
  • Claim valuation
  • Emotional/ psychological harm claims following data breach  

Corporate Services: We have considerable experience acting for large public and corporate bodies. As well as handling litigated personal injury claims, we also advise corporates on emerging risks and provide training to employers to help reduce the incidence of claims, increase claims defensibility and reduce claims costs.

Dispute resolution: We help our clients avoid litigation and provide expert advice to resolve disputes where possible. Our advice is, clear, commercial and conscious of reputational risk. We will vigorously defend unmeritorious claims.

Costs: As legal costs are increasingly a significant factor in all dispute resolution, the team now has a dedicated costs unit to further enhance our service to clients across CMS, minimising costs spend, maximising costs recovery and providing strategic costs advice.

Full Service: As a full-service firm, we work closely with colleagues in areas such as construction, health and safety and employment to provide comprehensive personal injury advice focused on achieving the best outcome. Our cross-disciplinary team is available 24/7 365 via our Emergency Response hotline, supporting clients with a variety of crisis incidents.

Examples of CMS' defendant personal injury work

  • A large construction company in a highly sensitive claim, which required detailed examination of corporate structure and insurance archaeology, investigations into the Spanish equivalent of the Coroners’ system, and translation and understanding of complex medical terminology. 
  • A government department in the defence of a group litigation order (GLO) in respect of 290 former coke workers suffering from a range of disabilities and injuries, including lung cancer, skin cancer and a variety of non-malignant respiratory diseases. The claims involved the operation of coke works in 14 different locations over a period of 60 years. 
  • An international organisation facing multiple catastrophic injury claims arising from a helicopter crash. Advising on cross-jurisdictional insurance, claims in excess of indemnity, impecunious estate of deceased claimant, limitation periods for claims by minors and secondary victim claims.  
  • Multiple confidential clients in relation to civil claims for damages for distress, psychiatric injury and financial loss following data breach incidents. Working with the CMS Cyber team, the defendant personal injury team advised on liability, quantum and potential for group claims, as well as grounds for claims for misuse of private information, breach of confidence and breach of statutory duty under the Data Protection Act and GDPR.

A very efficient team in all aspects of personal injury litigation.

Legal 500, 2022

All members of the [CMS Defendant Personal Injury] team work extremely effectively together. Some major tasks and others at short notice require collective working to tight deadlines which are always completed to a high degree of professionalism. There really is a one for all and all for one attitude.

Legal 500, 2021
CMS Emer­gency Re­sponse Sup­port Line
Ad­vising the Board


Eng­lish High Court hands down first judg­ment on the new ‘crypto’ ser­vice...
The Eng­lish High Court has gran­ted an or­der re­quir­ing a num­ber of crypto ex­changes to provide a vic­tim of fraud with in­form­a­tion re­gard­ing some of their cus­tom­er ac­counts and the where­abouts of the vic­tim’s...
Prob­lems with con­cur­rent leases and the Elec­tron­ic Com­mu­nic­a­tions Code
In Au­gust this year, the Up­per Tribunal pub­lished a de­cision which iden­ti­fies a ser­i­ous gap in Sched­ule 3A of the Com­mu­nic­a­tions Act 2003 (the Elec­tron­ic Com­mu­nic­a­tions Code) (“Code”) and raises con­cerns...
A bump­er warn­ing for un­re­gistered design rights hold­ers: High Court ap­plies...
In­tro­duc­tion: In Leighton Vans Lim­ited v Dav­id Wil­li­am Har­ris & an­oth­er [2022] EWHC 2386 (Ch), the High Court has gran­ted a lim­ited short-term in­ter­im in­junc­tion and re­fused to make an or­der for dis­clos­ure...
Un­lock­ing the po­ten­tial of Solvency II?
Few Au­tumn State­ments have been of as much in­terest to in­surers (and an­nu­ity in­surers, in par­tic­u­lar) as the one de­livered by Jeremy Hunt on 17 Novem­ber 2022. With a prom­ise of “un­lock[ing] tens of...
Glob­al Life Sci­ences & Health­care For­um 2022: Life Sci­ences are reap­ing...
Di­git­al trans­form­a­tion in life sci­ences is cre­at­ing op­por­tun­it­ies to counter health­care’s most in­tract­able prob­lems from treat­ing rare dis­eases to ac­cel­er­at­ing dia­gnostics and re­du­cing treat­ment back­logs...
Lidl v Tesco – the dis­counter and su­per­mar­ket go head-to-head in the UK...
Do con­sumers think of Lidl when they shop us­ing their Tesco Club­card? This is the root of the cur­rent trade mark dis­pute between su­per­mar­ket chains Lidl and Tesco. More spe­cific­ally, the ques­tion be­fore...
Court of Ap­peal cla­ri­fies the con­trac­tu­al duty of good faith
The Court of Ap­peal has un­an­im­ously over­turned a High Court judg­ment, find­ing that minor­ity share­hold­ers were not un­fairly pre­ju­diced by ac­tions of the ma­jor­ity share­hold­ers and that the pre­vi­ous judg­ment...
Ar­bit­ra­tion of FRAND dis­putes
UK Court of Ap­peal gives strongest steer yet for set­tling FRAND dis­putes via ar­bit­ra­tion Last week, the Court of Ap­peal handed down its judge­ment in Optis, in which it was asked to opine on the avail­ab­il­ity...
Sun­set Strip: the Re­tained EU Law (Re­voc­a­tion and Re­form) Bill and its...
Hav­ing re­tained EU law un­der the European Uni­on (With­draw­al) Act 2018 (EU­WA), which came in­to force on 31 Decem­ber 2020, the Gov­ern­ment has put in train the pro­cess by which such “re­tained law” is...
Court of Ap­peal tem­por­ar­ily closes door on any ar­gu­ment that pre-ac­tion...
The Court of Ap­peal has al­lowed an ap­peal re­gard­ing the du­ties owed to a cli­ent by a so­li­cit­or when ne­go­ti­at­ing the terms of a re­tain­er and has also made a de­term­in­a­tion as to the non-con­ten­tious nature...
HS2 wins route-length High Court in­junc­tion against protest­ors
On 20 Septem­ber 2022, Knowles J gran­ted an in­ter­im in­junc­tion to High Speed Two Lim­ited (“HS2”) and the Sec­ret­ary of State for Trans­port (“SoST”) against four cat­egor­ies of ‘per­sons un­known’...
Busi­ness In­ter­rup­tion In­sur­ance and Cov­id-19: ag­greg­a­tion and fur­lough...
In Janu­ary 2021, the Su­preme Court de­livered its judg­ment in the FCA’s Test Case on non-dam­age busi­ness in­ter­rup­tion (BI) cov­er for losses arising from the Cov­id-19 pan­dem­ic. See our pre­vi­ous Law-Now...