Home / Europe / United Kingdom / Dispute Resolution / Corporate Disputes
abstract blue purple and pink blocks

Corporate Disputes

Back to Dispute Resolution

Our dispute resolution team has extensive experience advising clients on their most complex, high-stakes M&A, shareholder and other stakeholder-related disputes. Corporate transactions can bring about challenging issues for parties, including, for example, as a result of disputes between co-shareholders of a joint venture, purported breaches of sale agreements, and even serious allegations involving fraud or third parties challenging the ownership of assets. 

Often, those disputes require a degree of sensitivity to preserve a commercial relationship. In other circumstances, a more direct approach is required. Our clients’ commercial goals remain the focus of our strategy when helping to resolve any corporate dispute.

Our experience includes advising:  

  • Slater & Gordon in its Commercial Court claim (valued in excess of £600 million) against Watchstone Group plc, formerly known as Quindell plc, for fraudulent misrepresentation and breach of warranty arising from the highly-publicised acquisition by Slater & Gordon of Quindell's legal services division.
  • An investment company on an LCIA arbitration relating to the fault for (and consequences of) the failure of the share sale of multiple Romanian target companies valued at over EUR300 million, as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic and subsequent restrictions imposed by governments.
  • Two UAE oil and gas companies in a complex ICC arbitration with their joint venture partner concerning the ownership of a giant oil field in Iraq. 
  • The former non-executive directors of Petropavlovsk Plc in English High Court proceedings concerning allegations in relation to director’s duties and shareholder activism.
  • A prominent broadcaster in relation to the launch and operation of a joint venture, as well as ongoing shareholder issues concerning the valuation of one of its corporate investments.
  • Two financial institutions in relation to a complex and long running fraud dispute concerning the ownership of the shares of an English incorporated company in control of a major multiplayer online role-playing platform.
  • A Gulf investment company in relation to a share ownership dispute involving an application for urgent ex parte relief (a proprietary freezing order) to prevent the sale of a large number of shares in a prominent UK listed company and disclosure orders to trace the dissipated proceeds of previous share sales.
  • A CEE retailer on disputes strategy following a EUR 900 million SPA, including numerous warranty issues and an LCIA arbitration in respect of tax and other indemnity claims made by the buyer. 
  • Rockingham Limited in a derivative action brought on behalf of an international construction company against a shareholder, seeking repayment of a debt in light of the serious liquidity position of the construction company and the humanitarian crisis in the Middle East.
  • A leading construction company in respect of a completion accounts dispute in the High Court arising out of the sale of two group companies to a housebuilder in 2019 for over £1 billion.   

"The team of lawyers have a good knowledge base and analytical legal approach. These lawyers are hands-on, approachable and always willing to extend support."

Chambers, 2021

"A 21st century 24/7 powerhouse. Experienced team with all the skills necessary to deal with large-scale commercial litigation."

Legal 500, 2021

"Highly Commended: Litigation and Dispute Resolution Team of the Year (International)."

Legal Week British Legal Awards, 2020

"Corporate/Commercial Litigation Team of the Year."

Legal Week Commercial Litigation & Arbitration Awards, 2019

"UK Firm of the Year for Dispute Resolution."

Legal 500 Awards, 2018


Pro­tec­tion from protests
Protest on the streets, protest on­line, even lit­ig­a­tion used as a vehicle for protest.Protest­ors tar­get­ing a busi­ness may be stand­ing in a crowd, hold­ing a plac­ard or shout­ing slo­gans. But they may also be be­hind a com­puter screen or pur­su­ing a claim against the busi­ness through the courts. They may even be work­ing in­side the busi­ness, pre­par­ing to com­prom­ise its sys­tems or leak con­fid­en­tial in­form­a­tion.Wheth­er they are act­iv­ists, em­ploy­ees or cus­tom­ers, all these protest­ors may present a sub­stan­tial chal­lenge and a real threat to busi­nesses, in areas in­clud­ing its se­cur­ity, repu­ta­tion and bot­tom line. 
CMS Ex­pert Guide to In­ter­na­tion­al Ar­bit­ra­tion
We live in a con­nec­ted glob­al en­vir­on­ment where the num­ber and com­plex­ity of in­ter­na­tion­al trans­ac­tions is ever in­creas­ing.  As a con­sequence, the policies and activ­it­ies in one area of the world can...
CMS European M&A Study 2022
The CMS Cor­por­ate/M&A Group is pleased to launch the four­teenth edi­tion of the European M&A Study
In­ter­na­tion­al Dis­putes Di­gest
Ana­lys­is and com­ment­ary on glob­al dis­pute res­ol­u­tion trendsWel­come to our In­ter­na­tion­al Dis­putes Di­gest, a bi-an­nu­al pub­lic­a­tion fea­tur­ing ana­lys­is and com­ment­ary on the key trends cur­rently shap­ing the glob­al dis­pute res­ol­u­tion mar­ket. In these un­cer­tain times, glob­al busi­nesses in al­most every sec­tor are fa­cing chal­lenges brought about by an un­pre­ced­en­ted op­er­a­tion­al cli­mate. Ac­tions and de­cisions taken may be sub­ject to even great­er scru­tiny than nor­mal and, to­geth­er with new le­gis­lat­ive de­vel­op­ments around the world, we bring you the latest news on im­port­ant glob­al is­sues, op­por­tun­it­ies and chal­lenge.See be­low all edi­tions of the In­ter­na­tion­al Dis­putes Di­gest.
Leg­al guide for com­pany dir­ect­ors and CEOs in the UK
ESG ob­lig­a­tions for Dir­ect­ors and CEOs 1. Do ex­ist­ing dir­ect­ors’ du­ties con­tain ob­lig­a­tions that ap­ply to mat­ters that could be cat­egor­ised as an ESG con­sid­er­a­tion, e.g. the en­vir­on­ment, em­ploy­ee...