jurisdiction
- Albania
- Algeria
- Angola
- Argentina
- Australia
- Austria
- Belgium
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Brazil
- Bulgaria
- Chile
- China
- Colombia
- Croatia
- Czech Republic
- France
- Germany
- Hong Kong
- Hungary
- India
- Indonesia
- Italy
- Kenya
- Luxembourg
- Malaysia
-
Mauritius
- Mexico
- Monaco
- Montenegro
- Morocco
- Mozambique
- Netherlands
- Nigeria
- North Macedonia
- Norway
- Oman
- Peru
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Saudi Arabia
- Serbia
- Singapore
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- South Africa
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Thailand
- Turkiye
- Ukraine
- United Arab Emirates
- United Kingdom
| Source of law | The main legislation governing bribery and corruption in Mauritius is the Prevention of Corruption Act 2002 (POCA). | |
|---|---|---|
| Offence | Bribery by public official (section 4) Any public official 1 who solicits, accepts or obtains from another person, for himself or for another, a gratification for: | Bribery of public official (section 5) Any person who gives, agrees to give, or offers a gratification to a public official for: |
| ||
| Offence |
|
|
| The bribe | ||
| Is there a presumption that the advantage was given/received corruptly? | Section 83 of the POCA provides that it shall be presumed that at the time a gratification was received, the recipient knew that such gratification was made for a corrupt purpose. | |
| Would facilitation payments be caught? | Yes | |
| Would corporate hospitality be caught? | No No specific provision captures corporate hospitality. | |
| Is there any de minimis? | No | |
| Does the bribe have to be monetary? | No 2 | |
| Public officials | ||
| Does the offence only apply to bribing public officials? | Yes | |
| Acts performed outside Mauritius | ||
| Can bribery performed outside Mauritius be caught? | Yes 3 | |
| Does the act also need to be illegal in the foreign country of performance? | No 4 | |
| Who can be liable? | ||
| Mauritian nationals? | Yes | |
| Mauritian company? | Yes | |
| Mauritian partnership (including limited liability partnerships) incorporated? | Yes | |
| Director of Mauritian company? | Yes | |
| Mauritian company if the bribe is committed abroad by its foreign subsidiary? | No specific provision provided under POCA in relation to foreign subsidiary. However, section 82A (2) provides that any act alleged to constitute an offence under POCA or a money laundering offence and which is committed outside Mauritius by a person, other than a company incorporated in Mauritius, shall, regardless of whether or not the act constitutes an offence or not at the place of its commission, be deemed to have been committed also in Mauritius if that act affects or is intended to affect a public body, a business or any other person in Mauritius | |
| Foreign subsidiary of a Mauritian company if the bribe is committed abroad? | No specific provision provided under POCA in relation to foreign subsidiary. | |
| Foreign national/company/partnership if bribe is committed in Mauritius? | Yes | |
| Foreign national domiciled or “ordinarily resident” in Mauritius if bribe is committed outside Mauritius? | Any offence committed in a country outside Mauritius as contemplated in section 82A4 is, for the purpose of determining the jurisdiction of a court to try the offence, deemed to have been committed:
| |
| Foreign company/partnership if bribe is committed abroad? | No No specific provision regarding foreign company/partnership if bribe is committed abroad | |
| Penalties | ||
| Penalties include: |
Taking gratification to screen offender from punishment
| |
| Defences | ||
| Are there any defences available? | No | |