jurisdiction
- Albania
- Algeria
- Angola
- Argentina
- Australia
- Austria
- Belgium
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Brazil
- Bulgaria
- Chile
- China
- Colombia
- Croatia
- Czech Republic
- France
- Germany
- Hong Kong
- Hungary
- India
- Indonesia
- Italy
- Kenya
- Luxembourg
- Malaysia
- Mauritius
- Mexico
- Monaco
- Montenegro
- Morocco
- Mozambique
- Netherlands
- Nigeria
- North Macedonia
- Norway
- Oman
-
Peru
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Saudi Arabia
- Serbia
- Singapore
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- South Africa
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Thailand
- Turkiye
- Ukraine
- United Arab Emirates
- United Kingdom
| Source of law | Legislative Decree N° 635, Criminal Code of Peru from 1991. Law N° 30424, Law that regulates the administrative responsibility of companies in the criminal process. Law N° 31740, Law that modifies Law N° 30424, Law that regulates the administrative responsibility of companies, to strengthen the anticorruption regulation referring to legal entities and promoting good corporate governance. Supreme Decree N° 002-2019-JUS, Regulations of Law N° 30424. Legislative Decree N° 1352, Legislative Decree that extends the administrative responsibilities of companies. Legislative Decree N° 1385, Legislative Decree that sanctions corruption in the private sphere.
|
|---|---|
| Offence | Bribery (Articles 397, 397-A, 398 and 398-A of the Criminal Code): To offer, give, or promise a public official any donations, promises, advantages or benefits in exchange for them:
This offence may be committed when any of the above conduct is directed towards magistrates, prosecutors, experts, arbitrators, members of the Administrative Tribunal or similar, judicial assistants, rapporteurs, or members of the National Police of Peru. Being bribed (Article 394, 395, 395-A, 395-B, 396 of the Criminal Code): Where a public official accepts, receives, or solicits directly or indirectly, or facilitates the delivery of a donation, promise or any other advantage or benefit to:
This crime may be committed by magistrates, prosecutors, experts, arbitrators, members of the Administrative Tribunal or similar, judicial assistants, rapporteurs or members of the National Police of Peru. Other forms of bribery are committed when the public official:
Corruption in the private sector (Article 241-A) of the Criminal Code) Promising, offering or granting an undue advantage or benefit of any nature, to the partner, shareholder, manager, director, administrator, legal representative, attorney-in-fact, employee or advisor of a private legal entity, non-governmental organisation, association, foundation, committee, including non-registered entities or irregular companies, in exchange for favouring them or third parties in the acquisition or commercialisation of goods or merchandise, in the contracting of commercial services or commercial relations. Those who accept or receive such undue donations, promises, advantages or benefits of any nature, for themselves or a third party, will also be sanctioned. Corruption within private entities (Article 241-B) of the Criminal Code) Accepting, receiving or requesting a donation, promise, or any other advantage or undue benefit of any nature for oneself or a third party, to carry out or omit an act to the detriment of the legal entity. The offence may be committed by the partner, shareholder, manager, director, administrator, legal representative, attorney-in-fact, employee or advisor of the private legal entity, non-governmental organisation, association, foundation, committee, including non-registered entities or irregular corporations. Anyone who promises, offers or grants such undue advantages or benefits of any nature, for themselves or a third party, as consideration for carrying out or omitting an act to the detriment of the legal entity, will also be punished. Note: In the case of corruption in the private sector and corruption within private entities, the criminal liability is for the person who commits the crime, not the company. The company has no criminal liability for this crime. |
| The bribe | |
| Is there a presumption that the advantage was given/received corruptly? | No |
| Would facilitation payments be caught? | Yes |
| Would corporate hospitality be caught? | No 1 |
| Is there any de minimis? | No |
| Does the bribe have to be monetary? | No |
| Public officials | |
| Does the offence only apply to bribing public officials? | Yes |
| Acts performed outside Peru | |
| Can bribery performed outside Peru be caught? | Yes 2 |
| Does the act also need to be illegal in the foreign country of performance? | No |
| Who can be liable? | |
| Peruvian nationals? | Yes |
| Peruvian company? | Yes 3 |
| Peruvian partnership (including limited liability partnerships) incorporated? | Yes |
| Director of Peruvian company? | Yes |
| Peruvian company if the bribe is committed abroad by its foreign subsidiary? | Yes |
| Foreign subsidiary of a Peruvian company if the bribe is committed abroad? | Yes |
| Foreign national/company/partnership if bribe is committed in Peru? | Yes 4 |
| Foreign national domiciled or “ordinarily resident” in Peru if bribe is committed outside Peru? | No |
| Foreign company/partnership if bribe is committed abroad? | No |
| Penalties | |
| Penalties include: | Criminal Code of Peru from 1991, Legislative Decree N° 1243, Legislative Decree N° 1385 Individual
Company Wherever there is individual liability, the following measures may be imposed on the organisation:
Law N° 30424 and, Legislative Decree N° 1352, Law N°o 30835 and Law N° 31740 Company Regardless of whether the individual that commits the crime is sanctioned (or even if they are prosecuted) the organisation may be held responsible and face the following penalties:
a. When the amount of the benefit obtained or expected to be obtained from the commission of the crime can be determined, the fine will be between 2 – 6x that amount. b. When the amount of the benefit obtained or expected to be obtained from the commission of the crime cannot be determined, it will be between ten and 10,000 UIT.
Applicable only to legal persons that have been incorporated and operated to favour, facilitate or conceal the commission of crimes. |
| Defences | |
| Are there any defences available? | The company is exempt from responsibility for the commission of crimes, if has developed and implemented an effective and tailored compliance programme before the crime is committed. This exemption is not applicable when the crime is committed by the partners, directors, de facto or legal administrators, legal representatives or attorneys-in-fact, with the capacity to control the company. |